User talk:Jmcgnh/Archives/2016/07

"Kept woman"

I misclicked in reverting you in miniskirt. I meant to point put that kept woman (redirect to mistress) isn't a very good explanation of the concept of sugar daddies. We don't have a separate article on that term, but it's definitely not properly explained through the concept of mistresses.

Peter ^Isotalo 14:03, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

@Peter Isotalo: I completely agree that there is currently no good article for the concept of Sugar daddy. The disambig page offers Kept woman and, given that the wording of the miniskirt article has the word "kept", I thought it would be alright to use it even though it is a redirect to mistress. Unfortunately, the article for Sugar baby is not really good for explaining Sugar daddy, either, since it has confined itself to one particular aspect of the practice and has what, to my ear, seems an odd POV.

We can leave it for now as a pointer to the disambiguation page - not a completely satisfactory solution - and see if another disambiguation-minded editor comes along with a better solution.  —jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:03, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Ah. Didn't think about the wording in the article. I edited out "kept by", though. It's pretty subjective wording with connotations of outright ownership and domination, but that's not really what's described in the source. I changed it to something a bit more neutral.

Peter ^Isotalo 19:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Reply to edits on Retrocasuality

Thanks for fixing my error on copyediting the article. I generally read through the article quite throughly, but I guessed I missed the quotation. Wyskoj (talk) 21:48, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

I was sensitized because I had just made a similar error recently. I'm happy to discuss the other edits that I reverted.

For instance, the "expanded about a ... local maximum" intends to designate the neighborhood of the maximum rather than an operation driving to the maximum.

Cheers,  —jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:02, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Fantasy

Thanks for reverting my edit to Fantasy. I certainly didn't mean to delete anything! ... And on checking, I see that I didn't. In the diff, but not in the actual article, the sentence after my insertion is shown shifted down to a separate "paragraph". That's just the way diff works.

Yes, of course I should have provided documentation for alternate history. I'll find some proper sources before putting it back in. --Thnidu (talk) 01:04, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, perhaps too quick on the trigger on my part. I guess I was misled by the diff display.  —jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

We all have to start somewhere. I've been doing this for a decade and I'm still learning about it. You're doing a lot of good work. Keep going! :-) --Thnidu (t alk) 03:01, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Lion of Judah in Four horsemen of the Apocalypse

Wikipedia does not care about you or me being qualified scholars. Wikipedia is not a scholarly site, but a summary of sources that speak for themselves... what the book states is "1 watched as the Lamb opened the first of the seven seals"... not lion so I think removing the lion reference is justified, please stop including it. thank you. please... — Preceding unsigned comment added by AaronottoJennings (talk • contribs) 03:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Does SineBot work here? User:AaronottoJennings , please observe the style guidelines of WP:Talk.

Thank you for wanting to help improve Wikipedia. When there's disagreement between editors, the resulting discussion is an opportunity to develop a well-supported consensus on an aspect of an article.

I understood your stance at Talk:Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse#Lion of Judah to be that you were willing to go along with the consensus view, at which point I undid your removal. Apparently that was a misunderstanding; I was surprised to see that you immediately undid this change. I suggest that the discussion on the talk page continue before we get into rule-breaking territory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmcgnh (talk • contribs) 04:25, 29 July 2016 (UTC)