User talk:Jmcapdevj
Concern regarding Draft:John R Falck
[edit]
Hello, Jmcapdevj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John R Falck, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:John R Falck has a new comment
[edit]
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Jmcapdevj, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.
Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.
New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
- Article development
- Standard layout
- Lead section
- The perfect article
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! S0091 (talk) 23:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi Jmcapdevj, reviewers agree Falck is notable but the draft does need some trimming and clean up. You may find this guide helpful for adding citations. If you have questions or need help, you can ask at the Teahouse. S0091 (talk) 23:09, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Not logged in
[edit]Please edit only when you are logged into your account. Otherwise the edits appear as being from an unregistered IP number. David notMD (talk) 21:27, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
February 2022
[edit]
Your edit to John R. Falck has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 23:09, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Dear Sir/Madam: I am at a loss to understand the reasons given for deleting my post: Draft: John R Falck. I can state categorically that none of what was listed in my post is copyright protected in that: a) contains only references to original studies published in well established scientific journals, b) since their publication date all of these studies are in the public domain and easily accessed by anybody interested via either the NIH Pub-Med site or using the corresponding DOI number ids, c) the research described in those studies was funded via grants from the USPHS National Institutes of Health, paid for with Federal public funds and, as required by NIH it is accessible to the public at large without restrictions, and d) an inspection of Wikipedia accepted and bibliographies use similar list of scientific studies published in Scientific Journals. Based on the above I am asking that the deletion of the Draft: John R Falck be again make available for revision by me and, eventually accepted for publication in Wikipedia. Jmacapdevj. Jorge H. Capdevila Professor Emeritus of Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical School Jmcapdevj (talk) 21:52, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Please see Wikipedia:Deletion review where any errors can be challenged formally. It is customary and more useful to take this up directly with the admin who performed the deletion. This is User:Jimfbleak. Mistakes happen. This may or may not be one. Please be aware that your title and role in life carry as much weight as do mine. That is none at all. All editors are equal here from Jimbo Wales to the casual one time only anonymous IP editor.
- Do please be aware that any article or draft may be edited by any and all editors. Asking for it to be returned to be edited by you is a usual misapprehension. Please see Wikipedia:Ownership of content
- Please be sure to declare any Wikipedia:Conflict of interest over Falck if there is one. That includes being a colleague or friend. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 22:18, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- I see anther editor has created a bare bones stub. Good. Falck is notable in Wikipedia terms. My view (above) on your article is that it was unsuitable. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 19:01, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of John R. Falck
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on John R. Falck requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:John_R_Falck.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. David notMD (talk) 03:25, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Try again
[edit]Yes, you can try again. Copy nothing. Learn how to reference. Include content only if you can provide verification in form of reliable source references. Model on existing articles about science academics (not a guarantee). David notMD (talk) 19:47, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]
|
Hi Jmcapdevj! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Draft John R falck moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Draft John R falck, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 22:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: John Russell “Camille” Falck (July 9)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Russell “Camille” Falck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Russell “Camille” Falck, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Jmcapdevj!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:02, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: John Russell “Camille” Falck (August 13)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Russell “Camille” Falck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: John Russell Falck has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Reba16 (talk) 00:33, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:35, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
[edit] Hello, Jmcapdevj. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 10:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC)