Jump to content

User talk:Jmansfield2021

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jmansfield2021, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Jmansfield2021! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:07, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Giooo95. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Camp Becket— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Giooo95 (talk) 02:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Camp Becket. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Giooo95 (talk) 03:17, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon

Hello Jmansfield2021. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Camp Beckett, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jmansfield2021. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jmansfield2021|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. John from Idegon (talk) 19:16, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Jmansfield2021! You created a thread called Making a subsection into its own article at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Camp Chimney Corners, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Camp Chimney Corners

[edit]

Hello, Jmansfield2021. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Camp Chimney Corners".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:06, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]