Jump to content

User talk:Jmajeremy/Archives/2013/March

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


WikiCup 2013 February newsletter

Round 1 is now over. The top 64 scorers have progressed to round 2, where they have been randomly split into eight pools of eight. At the end of April, the top two from each pool, as well as the 16 highest scorers from those remaining, will progress to round 3. Commiserations to those eliminated; if you're interested in still being involved in the WikiCup, able and willing reviewers will always be needed, and if you're interested in getting involved with other collaborative projects, take a look at the WikiWomen's Month discussed below.

Round 1 saw 21 competitors with over 100 points, which is fantastic; that suggests that this year's competition is going to be highly competative. Our lower scores indicate this, too: A score of 19 was required to reach round 2, which was significantly higher than the 11 points required in 2012 and 8 points required in 2011. The score needed to reach round 3 will be higher, and may depend on pool groupings. In 2011, 41 points secured a round 3 place, while in 2012, 65 was needed. Our top three scorers in round 1 were:

  1. Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), primarily for an array of warship GAs.
  2. London Miyagawa (submissions), primarily for an array of did you knows and good articles, some of which were awarded bonus points.
  3. New South Wales Casliber (submissions), due in no small part to Canis Minor, a featured article awarded a total of 340 points. A joint submission with Alaska Keilana (submissions), this is the highest scoring single article yet submitted in this year's competition.

Other contributors of note include:

Featured topics have still played no part in this year's competition, but once again, a curious contribution has been offered by British Empire The C of E (submissions): did you know that there is a Shit Brook in Shropshire? With April Fools' Day during the next round, there will probably be a good chance of more unusual articles...

March sees the WikiWomen's History Month, a series of collaborative efforts to aid the women's history WikiProject to coincide with Women's History Month and International Women's Day. A number of WikiCup participants have already started to take part. The project has a to-do list of articles needing work on the topic of women's history. Those interested in helping out with the project can find articles in need of attention there, or, alternatively, add articles to the list. Those interested in collaborating on articles on women's history are also welcome to use the WikiCup talk page to find others willing to lend a helping hand. Another collaboration currently running is an an effort from WikiCup participants to coordinate a number of Easter-themed did you know articles. Contributions are welcome!

A few final administrative issues. From now on, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 17:30, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Second Amendment to the United States Constitution

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

Please comment on Talk:Rape culture

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Rape culture. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lotus berthelotii.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:Lotus berthelotii.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:11, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longerdays.com

Can you help me understand how I can make the article more neutral to avoid the Template:COI and Template:Self-published? Can you tell me what the specific problem is so that I can address it, or if the article needs to be proof-read by a third party can you tell me how I can have that done?

Thank you!

--Chadlee123 (talk) 18:41, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi Chadlee123. I placed the COI template because, based on your username, I guessed that you may be the same person as "Chad Lawie," listed as one of the founders of the company. This is just meant so that other non-biased editors may pay especially close attention to prose that may sound excessively promotional. This isn't inherently a comment on the article's content and there's nothing you can really do besides asking unbiased editors for a second opinion. As for the other "self-published" tag, this is because many of the citations link to articles written by Longerdays.com or unreliable sources who appear to be writing with some bias. The only reason I didn't nominate the article for deletion was because two articles in notable sources (Entrepreneur Magazine and GigaOM) indicating that it is probably a notable company and therefore there are probably more reliable sources available on the subject. It looks like you've already done some more work on it since I tagged it, so once you have added some reliable unbiased sources, feel free to remove the tag. —JmaJeremy✆✎ 18:53, 15 March 2013 (UTC)


Thanks Jmajeremy. I added some additional press coverage including CBS Detroit, NPR, and PC World. I'll look up some other, more reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chadlee123 (talk • contribs) 19:31, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fort Hood shooting

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fort Hood shooting. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Democratic Party of Mongolia logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Democratic Party of Mongolia logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:25, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

Please comment on Talk:Karl Marx

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Karl Marx. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Greetings

Hello there! Thanks for all your contributions to Wikipedia. =) Thank you also for applying to be an online ambassador. I regret to inform you that I'm not ready to "endorse" your application at the moment. I guess I would like to see more work on higher-quality content building, since that is the main goal of the education program, I suppose (to improve Wikipedia). Do you think you might do some content work and re-apply if you don't get two endorsements? Anyhow, I just wanted to reach out to you, and thank you for all your good work here. Best. Biosthmors (talk) 17:12, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Biosthmors. I can understand your concerns about my lack of article-writing experience. I expect to do more article work soon—particularly in areas where I can translate material from French Wikipedia or articles related to my local region. It would be nice to accomplish a few DYKs, GAs or even FAs. Cheers- —JmaJeremy✆✎ 22:17, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 March 2013

Please comment on Talk:Ferenc Szaniszló

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ferenc Szaniszló. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 08:20, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jmajeremy/Archives/2013/March&oldid=1148699475"