User talk:Jlujan69

Christian God

Since the Christian God is used as the subject of the article, it's worth noting that even the Bible says that God is not capable of doing anything conceivable. It says, for example, that He can't sin since that would contradict His moral perfection. If His creating an unliftable stone would contradict His perfection (and it would), then He can't do it. Therefore, the Bible supports the position that God is "essentially" omnipotent. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jlujan69 (talk • contribs) 2006-01-09 21:46:56 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Jlujan69, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! The Rod (☎ Smith) 20:25, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Chick

Nice work on clarifying the outcome of Chick tracts. I hadn't noticed the error myself. Tijuana Brass^¡Épa!-E@ 05:55, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Christianity

It's considered bad form to make changes to an article while those changes are the subject of discussion on the article's talk page. Slac speak up! 05:10, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:102406LUNDGREN.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:102406LUNDGREN.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:04, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on LA riots

Your edits look great! futurebird 04:08, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Three Revert Rule

You may want to review what is known as the "Three Revert Rule." [1] You have exceeded that with reverting the opening sentence of "Jehovah's Witnesses" more than three times today. Dtbrown 04:52, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 24 hours for violation of the 3RR

Please take a look and review WP:3RR when you get a chance. You have been blocked for violating this policy, but after 24 hours, please come on back and edit wikipedia! There are probably more constructive ways of editing a controversial article than edit warring, and I encourage you to take a look at the extensive discussions taking place on Jehovah's Witnesses. joshbuddy, talk 05:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Men's Role in Childbirth

G'day. I'm wondering why you changed "male partner" to husband? "Male partner" is an inclusive term whilst "husband" is limited to only those who are married. Your change makes little sense in an article about birth when marriage has nothing to do with it. I've reverted your changes. Maustrauser 00:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you deleting stuff from Talk:John Hagee?

Randomly deleting discussions isn't exactly the best way to deal with talk page sections, why are you deleting large discussions? Homestarmy 21:31, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==See my reply on John Hagee discussion page.Jlujan69 23:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:070320 canyon hlg 6p.hlarge.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:070320 canyon hlg 6p.hlarge.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Calvinism

The goal of WikiProject Calvinism is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Calvinism available on Wikipedia. WP:WikiProject Calvinism as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Calvinism, but prefers that all Calvinist traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

--Flex (talk|contribs) 16:01, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IT2 Cruz Negron

Provide and cite a verifiable reliable source as required by Wikipedia policy in which we can see why IT2 Cruz Negron is to be considered notable. Until then please do add his name to the list. Me must respect the fact that this list is for "Famous or notable" Puerto Ricans. Thank you Tony the Marine 21:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a Warning, you are on the verge of breaking Wikipeidas 3 revert rule and you may be blocked from editing. I'm trying to be civil with you about this. I am in charge of overseeing the names added to the military sections of these lists. Unless you can provide evidence that IT2 Cruz Negron meets notablility criteria, please do not add his name to the list. Your work is valued in Wikipedia, but you must maintain yourself within policy. Thank you Tony the Marine 23:24, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chamorro Scouting

Can you help render "Be Prepared", the Scout Motto, into Chamorro? Thanks! Chris 15:02, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Infant. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dravecky (talk) 07:08, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Hypergamy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NJGW (talk) 06:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kent Hovind, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kent Hovind. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:07, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jlujan69. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Hello, I'm EvergreenFir. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Trans man seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 01:25, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

O3000 (talk) 01:33, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

More info about above

The warning is not an indication that you have done anything wrong. Just be careful when editing American political articles like : Racial views of Donald Trump. O3000 (talk) 01:37, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're at risk of being blocked or topic banned

This edit[2] was absolutely unacceptable. Your latest edit[3] was also unless you can show on the article's talk page that the information was incorrect. Please do that now. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 09:04, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jlujan69. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Friday the 13th Part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 01:07, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Maame Biney

Hey JluJan - I just wanted to let you know that I reverted your recent edit to Maame Biney. An athlete appearing in an ad campaign may be notable, but only if it receives coverage from third-party sources. Additionally, even if that is the case, we must be very careful with this type of coverage - e.g. instead of using the campaign's own wording like "made the Visa Olympics team," we should describe it for what it really is (in this case, appearing in a Visa ad campaign). Prominently linking to the ad itself is a concern too for obvious reasons, which is another reason why independent, third-party coverage of an ad is essential for it being included in a Wikipedia article. Please feel free to let me know or open a discussion on the talk page if you disagree with this reversion. -Elmer Clark (talk) 22:26, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chelsea Noble edit

I have reverted your addition of a date of birth to Chelsea Noble. In addition to Wikipedia's basic principle of citing sources (Wikipedia:Citing sources), a special need for citations applies with regard to elements of a biography of a living person (WP:BLPPRIVACY). Feel free to add a date of birth when it is accompanied by a citation to a reliable, published source. Eddie Blick (talk) 02:57, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chuck Lorre, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 22:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]