User talk:Jlgorman24

Your submission at Articles for creation

Pearmund Cellars, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

RadioFan (talk) 13:46, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pearmund Cellars

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pearmund Cellars, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 00:33, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pearmund Cellars for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pearmund Cellars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearmund Cellars until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:55, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pearmund Cellars

Consider adding your thoughts to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearmund Cellars |deletion discussion]] for the article on Pearmund Cellars. --RadioFan (talk) 02:58, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the outcome. Sadly, we have a group of editors here who feel that the best way to build a compendium of knowledge is to keep as much information as possible out of the encyclopedia. You may want to try WP:Deletion Review, as the deletion was based on WP:WINESOURCES, which is not part of any policy or guideline; the closing admin really should have known better. Joefromrandb (talk) 06:08, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]