User talk:Jlam4911

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Jlam4911! My name is Ryan, aka Acetic Acid. I noticed that you were new and haven't received any messages yet. I just wanted to see how you were doing. Wikipedia can be a little intimidating at first, since it uses different formatting than other sites that use HTML and CSS. In the long run, though, you'll find that the WikiSyntax is a lot easier and faster than those other ways. Here are a few links to get you started:

There are a lot of policies and guides to read, but I highly recommend reading over those first. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Please be sure to sign your name on Talk using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, along with a link to your user page. This way, others know when you left a message and how to find you. It's easier than having to type out your name, right? :)

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. We can use all the help we can get! Have a nice day. Sincerely, Ryan 09:32, August 1, 2005 (UTC)

Ronald20

Welcome to the daily Ronald20 (talk · contribs) (aka 204.108.96.10 (talk · contribs) cleanup patrol. ;-) BlankVerse ∅ 10:05, 2 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ronald20 (talk · contribs) has now done three reverts to the KYXY article. I've put a warning on his user page that he can be blocked from editing if he does a forth revert within a 24 hr. period. If you notice a fourth revert before that time is up, you should report it to WP:AN/3RR. You should also note that as that user and as the IP 204.108.96.10 (talk · contribs), that he has been reported to WP:VIP, and while editing at various IPs in the range 204.108.xx.xx out of the Los Angeles Unified School District that he has been causing problems with Southern California radio and TV station articles since at least May. You should also note that in the last couple of days he has escalated to page blanking and revert warring. BlankVerse ∅ 09:26, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I know...it's getting a bit ridiculous. Thanks for helping me out here Jlam4911 09:28, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just a caution for you: For the edit war on KYXY, you technically had four reverts. Although I personally would count them as reverting nonsense vandalism, which is allowed under WP:3RR, some admins will take the attitude of "hang 'em all". If you run into the same problem again, try to contact me or any of the other editors that have been cleaning up after Ronald20, just to stay on the safe side.

Gawd! I just looked and he's already done a bunch of editing this morning, including his 4th revert on KYXY (as 204.108.96.10 (talk · contribs) (with user:Meelar reverting him)! BlankVerse ∅ 15:02, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Even though I said at WP:VIP that I had quit fixing things, I've gone a fixed most of the changes this morning, plus reported the 3RR violation. If that doesn't work, I'm going to start calling in favors from all the admins I know. BlankVerse ∅ 18:09, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

For more info, please see User:BlankVerse/RonaldWatch. BlankVerse ∅ 08:53, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Even though I was the one who created the User page, Ronald20 did add some information to the page today. Since he has never responded to anything on his Talk page, I count that as some very modest progress. On the other hand, he apparently was adding stubs to large articles again, so User:Lucky 6.9 as one of his first "official" acts as a very new admin blocked Ronald20 for 48 hrs. BlankVerse ∅ 02:39, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Hotdoggydog.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Hotdoggydog.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:18, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jlam4911. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Don Goldwater for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Don Goldwater is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Goldwater until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 21:18, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]