User talk:Jkaradell

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Jkaradell, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Brewcrewer 07:59, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David Ortiz

Please stop removing valid material from David Ortiz. If you object to it, discuss it the talk page first. You'd be very welcome in the discussion of this topic there.

Thanks for your many fine copy edits to the article. PhGustaf (talk) 07:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on David Ortiz. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at David Ortiz. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. MastCell ^Talk 22:33, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

David Ortiz

Please read WP:BLP. When adding information to articles about living people, you must provide reliable sources. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 02:26, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

David Ortiz

Thanks for your daily updates to his page. My, what a nice homer that was today. 23:11, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

October 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from David Ortiz with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 03:49, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. When you recently edited David Ortiz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grand slam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Ortiz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hits (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Ortiz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Price (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:16, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Ortiz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grand slam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Ortiz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hits (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing.

Your edits to the 50 home run club list have been disruptive to say the least. First, you resort to content blanking[1] of verified material that has been sourced by multiple reliable references. Then, you claim[2] that "[i]n Ortiz and Bautista case these are allegations." This statement is false on two counts. Firstly, the Bautista article isn't even implicating or alleging that he took PEDs. It's saying that other 50 HR club members before him have been, which is why I provided the quote to accompany the ref. Secondly, it has been proven by both ESPN and The New York Times that Ortiz failed the 2003 test for PEDs. The sources don't say "allegedly" tested positive; they say flat out, "were among the [MLB] players to test positive for performance-enhancing drugs." Please go ahead and try to disprove two reliable news sources that they are incorrect and that Ortiz is clean. If you can't (and I'm assuming you can't, because it's the truth, even if it hurts), then please stop your disruptive editing. Judging from your contributions, you appear to be a big David Ortiz fan, but it isn't cool to disrupt WP simply to make a point. —Bloom6132 (talk) 13:24, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jkaradell. You have new messages at Bloom6132's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Kind reminder

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. —Bloom6132 (talk) 08:10, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Ortiz-david060921ap.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ortiz-david060921ap.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:David Ortiz in 2006 picture.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:David Ortiz in 2006 picture.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 12:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:David-Ortiz34.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:David-Ortiz34.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UCinternational (talk) 14:08, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ortiz2005.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Ortiz2005.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UCinternational (talk) 14:08, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:56, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

David Ortiz

The 2014 picture of Ortiz isn't just more recent; it's also better quality. That's a fact. It's your personal opinion that the picture "sucks," and your personal opinion should not determine whether it's used or not. --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 19:38, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on David Ortiz. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 02:05, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Jkaradell reported by User:A guy saved by Jesus (Result: ). Thank you. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 02:30, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

David Ortiz page

Elcid ruderico, Dude if you're gonna change the whole heading of the page (which in my opinion is totally unnecessary) then you need to fix the grammar in all those sentences. It's horrible.

I honestly don't know what your deal is, Jkaradell. First, don't call me "dude" because I don't know you and at this point I would never care to know you. Second, to revert edits that are not vandalism and that are within the subject content is completely poor form. The David Ortiz article was flagged for an insufficiently descriptive intro. Instead of making minor or modest edits, you reverted an edit which actually took some time to do. You supported your reason for doing so only by opinion − of which Wikipedia is neither an opinion site nor blog − offering no examples demonstrating why you thought I had written with "poor grammar." In fact, you are the only editor who has ever griped about my grammar. Why don't you try browsing some of the good articles that I have successfully submitted for promotion, which can be found on my talk page, and then deciding if my grammar is poor? Your opinion with a lack of supporting detail about sentence structure indicated that you are not very well-educated. I see that one theme common throughout the responses from other editors here on this talk page is that you concern yourself more with creating edit wars rather than improving articles. So why do you even waste your time on Wikipedia? Elcid.ruderico (talk) 02:05, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jkaradell. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jkaradell. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jkaradell. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]