User talk:Jimothytrotter/Archive 2

Jimothytrotter

User Talk Contributions Edit Count Sandbox Email I'm: OFFLINE forever!

Talk Page Guidelines

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

Table of Contents and Archives

Archives July-September September-October October-Novemberr

Messages

Hello 250 main edits is the amount required to qualify for vandalproof. click here to see your edit count Welcome to Esperanza! Welcome, Jimothytrotter, to Esperanza! As you might know, all the Esperanzians share one important goal: the success of this encyclopedia. Within that, we then attempt to strengthen the community bonds, and be the "approachable" side of the project. All of our ideals are held in the Charter, the governing document of the association. Now that you are a member you should read the guide to what to do now or you may be interested in some of our programs. A quite important program is Stressbusters, which seeks to support editors who have encountered any stress from their Wikipedia events, and are seeking to leave the project. So far, Esperanza can be credited with the support and retention of several users. We will send you newsletters to keep you up to date. Also, we have a calendar of special events, member birthdays, and other holidays that you can add to and follow. In addition to these projects, several more missions of Esperanza are in development, and are currently being created at Esperanza/Proposals. If you have any other questions, concerns, comments, or general ideas, Esperanzian or otherwise, know that you can always contact Natalya by email or talk page. Consider introducing yourself at the Esperanza talk page! Alternatively, you could communicate with fellow users via our IRC channel, #wikipedia-esperanza (which is also good for a fun chat or two :). If you're new to IRC, you may find help at an IRC tutorial. I thank you for joining Esperanza, and look forward to working with you in making Wikipedia a better place to work! — riana_dzasta wreak havoc|damage report 08:42, 10 September 2006 (UTC) I'm glad you've reformed... ...and I accept your implied apology. I would advise you to put some distance between yourself and your friend, however. Your support of him is admirable, but you are just dragging yourself down with him and your close association suggests that any future block on him for trolling and personal attacks would effect you too. So your new start is a good idea and I wish you good luck. Happy editing! ➨ ЯEDVERS 08:55, 10 September 2006 (UTC) sig made new signature JiMoThYTALK Adminship... ...is explained here. Whilst no formal standards exist, there are many informal ones. Some people publish lists of their criteria for supporting or opposing nominations for sysop - based on edit numbers, blocks, users welcomed, vandalism reverted, helpful things done for the 'pedia, length of service, that type of thing. I don't do this, but my criteria for support are (roughly) that the editing patterns of the nominee are useful to the encyclopedia; that there is some evidence of community input; and that the editor needs and would make use of the tool. I usually only comment to support unless I really don't trust the user with the tools. And I usually only comment on editors who I have dealt with personally or have seen in action a fair bit. Which is quite a lot of them because I edit everywhere on Wikipedia, fairly at random somedays. ➨ ЯEDVERS 13:19, 10 September 2006 (UTC) thanks thanks for welcoming me. I'm pretty sure I will love wikipedia. --TV Lover 18:27, 10 September 2006 (UTC) Darren He can "not annoy" me by not contacting me and keeping his trolling and personal attacks to himself. That would be better for everyone. Thanks. ➨ ЯEDVERS 18:47, 10 September 2006 (UTC) Monobook Please confirm by adding {{db-author}} to the top of the page in question. Thanks. ➨ ЯEDVERS 19:46, 10 September 2006 (UTC) New talk page there is a mistake in your talk page. The link to leave a message will leave messages at daniels page. I don't know how to correct it . sorry your new reformed friend User:Dean randall/sig Welcome to the Kindness Campaign! Just my way of saying thanks to newcomers to the Kindness Campaign... a delicious home-baked chocolate chip cookie! Yum. :D  ♥ Kylu  (talk • contribs • email • logs • count) Sorry... ...about the link - I forgot to change it over from the one I copied from my talk page. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant 06:21, 11 September 2006 (UTC) An automated message from Werdnabot Hi there, I tried to archive your user talk page, but it seems that you have an error in your Werdnabot directive that prevented me from correctly archiving your User talk page. Please review this error, or contact Werdna648 for assistance. Werdnabot (DNBF)/T\C 12:16, 11 September 2006 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Stubs Jonathan Shaw Frank Kelly Rog-O-Matic Loebner prize Snooper and Blabber Luffa St. Edmund's School (Hindhead) Pauline McLynn Artificial Linguistic Internet Computer Entity Callie Khouri Burton Valley Elementary John Pugh Mail transfer agent Ardal O'Hanlon Stigand of Selsey Mutation (genetic algorithm) DAYTIME Criterion validity K-line (artificial intelligence) Cleanup Computer vision Self-awareness Marvin Minsky Merge Control system Image analysis Synthetic Intelligence Add Sources Hugo de Garis NSFW Avatar (virtual reality) Wikify Louis le Brocquy Solebury School Queniborough Expand Ghost in the Shell (manga) Gaibandha District University of Illinois Press SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 12:56, 11 September 2006 (UTC) Whats he called Wats the name of the guy that does your user page? I'm so addicted to this now. KingLloyd 16:04, 11 September 2006 (UTC) Its so fun I can't believe how good it is, can't stop. i hate it when it says its busy though. Can't i have my sig so i can just do those 4 strange lines instead of KingLloydTALK when commenting without a header use a Colon to add an indent, as for the signature you can do that by clicking "my preferences" up the top near Log out, change your signature to the {{subst}} thingy. JiMoThYTALK No i'm afriad not. Four tidles will only display A link to your page and the time of the comment, not your personal sig User:Dean randall/sig ok sorry i got it wrong. my meebo aint working at the moment and neither is my msn so i'm on wiki DARReNTALK -- JiMoThYTALK 19:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC) Header problems: a) I fixed the header problem for the userboxes. It works fine b) However, the awards I don't think will work - this has been a long-running problem on Wikipedia. I'll see if I can find a solution, but I'm not sure I can. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant 07:06, 12 September 2006 (UTC) Yo, man. About Vaboo. I just made that up. Brian Boru is awesome 17:27, 13 September 2006 (UTC) Warnings There's a page of warning templates here. Please remember to assume good faith when using them. Always use the appropriate lowest-numbered template. Also, remember to subst: most templates. Thanks. ➨ ЯEDVERS 08:44, 14 September 2006 (UTC) Thanks for the raw sig advice Dean randall 20:49, 14 September 2006 (UTC) Re: quotes I responded to your query that you placed on my talk page. My response can be found here. Feel free to post any further comments on my talk page, and I'll respond to you as soon as possible. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant 06:37, 15 September 2006 (UTC) yes i have ben kindly welcoming people this morning. Nothing better to do so on a lovely Sunday morning. Wouldn't you agree. DARReNTALK 08:08, 17 September 2006 (UTC) yes indeed i am a member as far as i know DARReNTALK 08:10, 17 September 2006 (UTC) Changes made by yourself to the Covent Garden article. Just to let you know, your bot (?) made a mistake in correcting grammar. It changed "1600s" to "1600 S" in the context of the century. I have fixed it here but wanted to let you know. What were you trying to do? Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 11:29, 17 September 2006 (UTC) "Automated grammatical changes" Hi Jimothytrotter: what program(?) are you using to make all of your "Automated gramatical changes" edits? You are approving each edit, right? If you are not approving each edit you must open up a bot account and get it approved at WP:B/RFA (you should also read WP:BOT). —Mets501 (talk) 13:30, 17 September 2006 (UTC) I am approving each one myself, and am not using a bot. * am using buttons which i found on a script and added to my monobook.js. I try to revert changes promptly if the script makes erros. Thankyou for your concern. -- JiMoThYTALK 13:34, 17 September 2006 (UTC) Great! Thanks for helping improve the project in "minor edit" ways. —Mets501 (talk) 13:36, 17 September 2006 (UTC) On the subject of your "automated gramatical changes" (which, by the way, you should fix the spelling of, as it doesn't exactly inspire confidence) — could you maybe stick with changes that have a purpose? I'm thinking of edits like this one, where most of the changes have no effect on the resulting page, but make the diff all but unreadable, making it very hard to figure out what's actually changed. Thanks in advance! Ruakh 14:22, 17 September 2006 (UTC) User Ruakh has basically stated my own concern with the automated changes on Free will. I can't even read the diff to figure out what the changes were. And this is on a Featured Article. You must have a GREAT deal of confidence in automation which i do not share.--Francesco Franco aka Lacatosias 14:40, 17 September 2006 (UTC) Your changes at infinity today include capitalizing the <math> tag to <Math>. How strange. You also capitalized the word what inside a direct quotation, which disagrees with WP:STYLE. CMummert 14:35, 17 September 2006 (UTC) The reason for the automated gramtical changes was to boost my main space edit count in a "legal" way! I am hopeing to get VandalProof and subsequently stop using this method of editing, however until then I will be forced into remaining with the old method. Hope that clears it up-- JiMoThYTALK 14:47, 17 September 2006 (UTC) That doesn't address my concern at all! You did make at least one real change at Inflection — you capitalized the first letters of some list items — but I can't tell if that's the only real change, or what. If you want to make improvements, that's great, but if you feel the need to hide your edits by making diffs unreadable, then I have to suspect that you don't really intend them as improvements. (Your comment makes me wonder if perhaps you're verging on disrupting Wikipedia to illustrate the point that mere edit counts aren't necessarily a meaningful barrier to entry; if so, be warned that disrupting Wikipedia is verboten whatever the reason, and can get you blocked.) Ruakh 15:09, 17 September 2006 (UTC) If you want the editcount of a superstar and be a helpful editor at the same time, you could consider joining us at Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam. There is so much spam being added to Wikipedia continiously now, and we really need help to revert it all, and talk sense to the spammers. Haakon 17:35, 17 September 2006 (UTC) VandalProof Sure, consider yourself approved. It might take me a while to get through the list though! (I'm gone for one week and the whole list backs up... Oh well, at least I'm needed ;-) Prodego talk 15:14, 17 September 2006 (UTC) Welcome to VandalProof! Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Jimothytrotter! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego talk 15:24, 17 September 2006 (UTC) Automated gramatical changes Hi. I suggest you do not do the "automated gramatical changes" in articles. They achieve little besides inserting a newline here and there, but those changes fill up watchlists and may mask vandalism. A better venue for your energy would be I think for example spell-checking, or fixing articles in Category:All pages needing to be wikified, etc. Wonder what you think, you can reply here. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:58, 17 September 2006 (UTC) I second this. The changes to Encryption were counterproductive. Nice work on all the spelling fixes though. Haakon 17:23, 17 September 2006 (UTC) Agreed I only built the script this morning and was unaware of the changes it made to the diffs etc. I have been accepted for vandalproof and can therfore stop using the script. I wish i knew how to get vandalproof to accept my log in attempt though! I will also try to take a look at those suggested articles and clean some of them up. Thanks-- JiMoThYTALK 16:01, 17 September 2006 (UTC) RE: Vandalprrof problems I'm not sure it's the reason, but try capitalising your username. If this fails, let me know. Thanks! —Xyrael / 16:40, 17 September 2006 (UTC) Your script is making a mess As you should know, Wikipedia uses sentence case in titles, not all caps. Your script turned "16-bit" into "16-Bit" in Microsoft Windows, which is clearly incorrect. Please get your script fixed ASAP. Also, the correct spelling you're looking for is "grammatical." --Coolcaesar 17:49, 17 September 2006 (UTC) Consider reversing what you have wrought You should probably consider self-reverting the "automated gramatical changes" you made since they cause so much disruption to the difs and may have caused other undesirable changes (e.g. "Bit"). I've reverted a couple I came across, but I see there is quite a list of pages you've affected with this script. I'm sure many of those pages do not yet have further edits and so you can easily revert them (the others should probably stay the same). -R. S. Shaw 20:52, 17 September 2006 (UTC) I have considered it Its not going to be easy for me to do as I am a busy guy studying for my G.C.S.E's. I agree that some of them should be reverted however they are not all bad and i do not have the time to do it. I ahte to ahve to take this approach but I'm sure that whoever is next editing the article can decide what to do. Appologies yet again-- JiMoThYTALK 21:16, 17 September 2006 (UTC) An automated message from Werdnabot Hi there, I tried to archive your user talk page, but it seems that you have an error in your Werdnabot directive that prevented me from correctly archiving your User talk page. Please review this error, or contact Werdna648 for assistance. Werdnabot (DNBF)/T\C 07:16, 18 September 2006 (UTC) Your edit to Thomas Sumpter Comprehensive School Your recent edit to Thomas Sumpter Comprehensive School (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 15:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC) Thanks for the barnstar Thanks for the barnstar you awarded to me on the 10th. :D --Actown e 16:52, 18 September 2006 (UTC) Please pay attention... You corrected the spelling on obvious vandalism. I'm sorry, but that is just as bad as the vandalism itself and ends up covering said vandalism in recent changes. Either be more careful, or pay attention. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 18:49, 18 September 2006 (UTC) RE:VandalProof Groovy :) —Xyrael / 20:18, 18 September 2006 (UTC) September Esperanza Newsletter Program Feature: Barnstar Brigade Here in Wikipedia there are hundreds of wikipedians whose work and efforts go unappreciated. One occasionally comes across editors who have thousands of good edits, but because they may not get around as much as others, their contributions and hard work often go unnoticed. As Esperanzians we can help to make people feel appreciated, be it by some kind words or the awarding of a Barnstar. This is where the Barnstar Brigade comes in. The object of this program is to seek out the people which deserve a Barnstar, and help them feel appreciated. With your help, we can recognize more dedicated editors! What's New? September elections are upon us! Anyone wishing to be a part of the Advisory Council may list themselves as a candidate from 18 September until 24 September, with the voting taking place from 25 September to 30 September. Those who wish to help with the election staff should also list themselves! Appreciation Week, a program currently in development, now has its own subpage! Share your good ideas on how to make it awesome there! The Esperanza front page has been redesigned! Many thanks to all who worked hard on it. Many thanks to MiszaBot, courtesy of Misza13, for delivering the newsletter. The last AC meeting (full log) The proposals page has been updated, with some proposals being archived. Since the program in development Appretiaion week is getting lots of good ideas, it now has its own subpage. The September 2006 Council elections will open for nominations on 18 September 2006. The voting will run from 25 September 2006 until 30 September 2006. If you wish to be a candidate or a member of the elections staff, please list yourself! The new Esperanza front page design has but put up - many thanks to all who worked on it! TangoTango has written a script for a bot that will list new members of Esperanza, which will help those who welcome new Esperanzains greatly! Signed... Natalya, Banes, Celestianpower, EWS23, FireFox, Freakofnurture, and Titoxd 04:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC) Although having the newsletter appear on everyone's userpage is desired, this may not be ideal for everyone. If, in the future, you wish to receive a link to the newsletter, rather than the newsletter itself, you may add yourself to Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter/Opt Out List. Your user page. Hey there, I don't know if I ever thanked you for that Barnstar I was awarded way back when, but thanks! I love how you've set up your user page. How exactly did you do all of it? -_BoaDrummer 21:16, 22 September 2006 (UTC)