User talk:JimChan

Welcome

Hello and Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, or add a question to the village pump. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). -Fnlayson (talk) 21:43, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

JimChan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi JimChan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Please see Igor Sikorsky "talk page" about Igor Sikorsky's Nationality and Ethnisity JimChan (talk) 05:14, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I forgot that you posted comments on the talk page. However, your still engaging in edit warring, and falsely accusing editors of vandalism, which has a very specific meaning on English Wikipedia. It does not mean someone making edits you disagree with. - BilCat (talk) 05:35, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I first blocked you, but on the second thought decided to unblock you and fully protect the article since the actions of your opponent were not much better. If you resume edit-warring after the protection expires expect to get blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:51, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. My opponent BilCat removes references (links) to highly reputable sources, and changes content without providing the references to support his/her claims. It appears BilCat is having a Russian propagandistic agenda, uses Russian Neo-Nazi “Russian World” propaganda blog as references, and removes everything mentioning Ukraine. What can be done with this user? - JimChan (talk) 08:56, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jim, I'm not your opponent, but simply an editor trying to bring the article to a neutral state. That's a process, and I wasn't able to complete it because you simply reverted me, as you've done every time any editor has changed the article from what you've wanted it to say. Once you did that, I couldn't make any more changes without violating the Three-revert rule (3RR). You've violated 3RR on multiple occasions, and quite frankly should have remained blocked. I respect the admin's choice to unblock you, as that is their right. - BilCat (talk) 09:26, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bringing to a "neutral state" by removing everything mentioning Ukraine, destroying links to reliable and highly reputable sources, adding questionable content from a Russian Neo-Nazi “Russian World” propaganda blog, and adding 30+ instances of "Russia" and "Russian" in three paragraphs of text? Is this your definition of "bringing the article to a neutral state"? Please, stop it.

P.S. I used the word "opponent", because this is how you were identified by the administrator. -- JimChan (talk) 10:11, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, there was a pro-Russian IP that was the main culprit who was reverting what you added. As I said, I hadn't completed my work when you reverted it. I have a long edit history in the article of reverting non-neutral additions that the admin may not have been aware of. As I've told you several times, that article gets many people trying ti push their own nationalist point of view, inluding Russian, Polish, and of course Ukrainian. It's notban easy task, especially when some on each side are convinced they are right and won't accept any other viewpoint at all. There are ways to handle disputed content and to balance opposing views. However, continually accusing others of vandalism and pushing neo-Nazi propogands is not a recommended method. - 10:27, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Please stop... The only "editor" were you BilCat. - JimChan (talk) 10:36, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I made ~~one edit~~ one reverts and two other edits there today (last night for me). But this dispute has been going on for several weeks now, and that has included edits form both pro-Russian and pro-Ukrainian users. I'm neither. I'm just trying to achieve a neutral point of view, which we actually had for a long time. I'm not exactly sure what you want me to stop, since the article is fully protected, at my request. - BilCat (talk) 10:42, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]