User talk:JimBurnell

A welcome from Sango123

Hello, JimBurnell, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Simplified Ruleset
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Wikipedia Glossary

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

–Sango 123 (e) 19:16, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Hawthorne Caballeros

So you have no problem with an article that says The Caballeros are a drum corps in DCA who like to perform fellatio on men. and women of cabs suck too. overall, cabs are gay? User:Zoe|^(talk)` I do have a problem with that, and it should have been removed, but there was no need to delete the entire article. --JimBurnell 20:33, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can ressurect it, if you will put some text into it, because an article which only contains a taxobox is considered empty. User:Zoe|^(talk) 20:58, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As long as you don't mind if it's a very brief description of the corps, I will put something in it right away. I just haven't had time to flesh it out.--JimBurnell 21:04, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've undeleted it. Go ahead and put something in there. User:Zoe|^(talk) 22:27, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added a quickie stub so there's something there now. Thank you. --JimBurnell 22:48, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :) User:Zoe|^(talk) 23:52, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frontier Drum and Bugle Corps

See WP:N--Greatestrowerever 16:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic work

You've done a fantastic job referencing the article.. I'm impressed that you have such a grasp of cite.php (the <ref></ref>) tags after such a short time working on the Wikipedia. Curious though.. why are some of the references placed as inline external links (ex:[1]) and the rest are cite.php refs (ex:^[1])? Also, references should always go behind punctuation. That means, behind the punctuation that follows the clause that the reference is for.. so it can go in the middle of a sentence behind a comma or at the end of a sentence. -- drumguy8800 C T 23:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and no, I don't play anymore. Sorry -- drumguy8800 C T 23:16, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there's sort of a funny gap between Start and B classes, as you'll see here. I'd actually say B-Class now that you've referenced it so wonderfully. Before that though, maybe you should add a picture .. ? Do you have any? -- drumguy8800 C T 07:00, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bucs logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bucs logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Brigs logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Brigs logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:06, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Buccaneers

Their championships are listed in several different spots on there already. Can it be worked in a little better so that the article is not just a laundry list? That is what I was attempting to do with my edition of the page. Werecowmoo (talk) 16:07, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My goal is just to provide the most factual information. My roommate, a Buccaneers Alumni from 2004, confirmed what the source said on their website and had no way to know they'd picked up an additional sponsor. I simply provided a citation to back up what was presented on their organization website. Did not see anything wrong with editing while attempting to improve the article.Werecowmoo (talk) 22:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Atlanta CorpsVets

Apparently some people on Wikipedia want to delete the Atlanta CorpsVets page. Could you to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Atlanta_CorpsVets and offer your opinion. Also, if you think the article can be improved please feel free to do that.WolfenUWG 16:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank youWerecowmoo (talk) 22:02, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FrontierLogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FrontierLogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:17, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bush logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bush logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bucs logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Bucs logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cabs logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cabs logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Crossmen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Crossmen.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Statesmen logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Statesmen logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Washington Blade

Saw both your messages. I think you're right, it's good to have something at the top of the article as well as the bottom. I will also add a breaking news template.--Larrybob (talk) 17:00, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:If Then Logo.png

A tag has been placed on File:If Then Logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:24, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bucs2005.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:31, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Crossmen.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crossmen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:49, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JimBurnell. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, JimBurnell. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bushwackers Drum and Bugle Corps

The article Bushwackers Drum and Bugle Corps has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only source is a fan page. I can find a few mentions in local media but nithing that shows notability in WP:BEFORE. Clearly fails WP:ORG. WP:NOTEVERYTHING likely also applies.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 23:58, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bush logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bush logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bushwackers Drum and Bugle Corps for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bushwackers Drum and Bugle Corps is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bushwackers Drum and Bugle Corps until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:32, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Drum Corps Associates Class A World Champions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ron Nelson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, thanks. JimBurnell (talk) 14:21, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Frontier Drum and Bugle Corps

The article Frontier Drum and Bugle Corps has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable organization.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgsu98 (talk) 15:47, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They were notable when they were an active corps. They’ve been gone since 2008, and they didn’t win any championships, so I guess they’re no longer notable. JimBurnell (talk) 05:33, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Empire Statesmen Drum and Bugle Corps

The article Empire Statesmen Drum and Bugle Corps has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Defunct organization; no citations.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgsu98 (talk) 20:17, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have linked to an article showing their notability and removed the proposed deletion template. 21:48, 24 August 2022 (UTC) JimBurnell (talk) 21:48, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Empire Statesmen Drum and Bugle Corps for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Empire Statesmen Drum and Bugle Corps is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empire Statesmen Drum and Bugle Corps until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:44, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bush logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bush logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cabs logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cabs logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^ Google

[1] Google

[1]