User talk:Jgcarter/Archive 1

Mary Mary

Thank you for experimenting with the page Mary Mary on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Draicone 02:35, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Cecewinans.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cecewinans.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:04, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:I Owe You.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:I Owe You.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:07, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:This_Is_Me.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:This_Is_Me.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:38, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:This_is_me_special_edition.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:This_is_me_special_edition.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:30, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CeCe & Whitney

Hey... on CeCe & Whitney... who is godmother to whose children? CeCe to Whitney? Whitney to CeCe? or both to each other? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Souldier77 (talk • contribs) 05:50, 17 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Cece is godmother to Whitney's kids Jgcarter 05:52, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK cool. I corrected the trivia! Souldier77 19:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Whitney's only given birth to one child, Bobbi Kristina. The other kids are Bobby's from previous relationships. Check out her page. Of course, think about it... have you ever heard of Whitney being pregnant any other time than around when The Bodyguard came out? And you know they dig all in Whitney's business. It's a dang shame. Souldier77 20:05, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But she only got one kid! And you know "kids" is gon' take some explaining if Whitney really goes through with the divorce the media's been talkin' about. Souldier77 20:15, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Doin' too much?

Hey JG, I'm sorry. I'm probably doin' too much now. I just edited your user page so it forwards to your discussion page. I just wanted to be able to click on your name and then drop a comment on your page since we always talkin' about somethin. P.S. I got started on Coko's page, and I moved that little toy company out of the way and put in a request to move Coko Clemons back to just Coko, since people who know her just link there anyway. Holla! Souldier77 20:24, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yo, I am gon' cut you though. 'Cause you put "alblum" on that page again. I TOLD ju I was gon' cut'chu! Souldier77 20:25, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry again! I think I messed up some edits you were doing on Coko's page. I'm not sure. Could you check and make sure everything's still cool? Souldier77 23:16, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, the Coko edits worked out great! ≈≈≈ You know me though. I have to fuss with everything (doin' the most), so I added the date it was written (so people wouldn't think it was recent) and who wrote it. By the way, thanks for putting me up on that "accessdate" thing. I have to use that 'cause some of these references change day to day! ≈≈≈ Only one other thing: I gave your reference a name (look at the comparison), so you wouldn't have to cite the whole thing twice and have two copies of it show up under "References". — Souldier77 03:13, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Men Of Standard

Hey, can you do me a favor, and find some places to link the new stub I started on Men Of Standard? If you can add details to it, that'd be great. It seems like I'm only starting articles on people I don't know jack diddly squat about. But I guess that's the point, so other people can contribute too. — Souldier77 13:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

your recent edits

	Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! You recently added an external link to YouTube in an article. It has been removed because the link pointed to a non-encyclopedic source. Per WP:COPYRIGHT: External sites can possibly violate copyright. Linking to copyrighted works is usually not a problem, as long as you have made a reasonable effort to determine that the page in question is not violating someone else's copyright. If it is, please do not link to the page. Knowingly and intentionally directing others to a site that violates copyright has been considered a form of copyright infringement in the United States (Intellectual Reserve v. Utah Lighthouse Ministry). Also, linking to a page that illegally distributes someone else's work sheds a bad light on Wikipedia and its editors. If the site in question is making fair use of the material, linking is fine. Please refer to Wikipedia's policy on external links for more information. --JoeSmack ^Talk 04:02, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Mary

Hey... good call on your recent edits to Mary Mary's bio! Souldier77 23:30, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Coko

My bad. I forgot that you lumped it all together. Souldier77 01:46, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kiki

Hey JG... I think you're goin' wikilink crazy here! :) You probably shouldn't turn all the mentions of Karen Clark Sheard into a wikilinks. People will get it. Hey... you may wanna check out this page Wikipedia:Wikilink and read the little section on Internal Links (it's the first one). BTW, Happy new year! Souldier77 21:00, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Mary Mary Christmas (Album)

The article you wrote, A Mary Mary Christmas (Album), is uncategorized. Please help improve it by adding it to one or more categories, so it may be associated with related articles. A stub marker or other template doesn't count - please put in an actual category in the article.Eli Falk 22:19, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cecejet.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cecejet.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 02:00, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CeCe.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:CeCe.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MECU≈talk 02:01, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:CeCe.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CeCe.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then you need to specify who owns the copyright, please. If you got it from a website, then a link to the website where it was taken from with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:01, 16 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 02:01, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Coko_top.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Coko_top.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MECU≈talk 02:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

mary mary

thank you next time i will think about that

Cross Bronx

Hi. Why do you keep removing I-695 from the terminus of the Cross Bronx. The designation actually ends at the split of I-295 and I-695 so I-695 should be listed. --Polaron | Talk 20:17, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think that is the best way to go. I realize the I-295 portion is technically an extension but still it's part of the overall Cross Bronx Expressway. Sorry if I sounded rude. --Polaron | Talk 20:22, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is an article for Interstate 95 in New York that contains an exit list for the entire length of I-95 in New York. You can use that as a template for building other exit lists. If you need any specific help, feel free to leave me a message. --Polaron | Talk 20:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Byroncage.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Byroncage.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 05:01, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Gospel Music Wikiproject

I noticed your earlier work on the Fred Hammond and Byron Cage articles. I would like to invite you to join the new Gospel Music Wikiproject.
Absolon S. Kent 23:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am very exicted about this new project. I've been wanting one for a long time. Yes, I'd love to join this project! If you would like to see more of my edits, please see Coko, Cece Winans, Mary Mary, and Kierra Sheard. What is the procedure of joining? Have a great day!
Jgcarter 01:50, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for joining. The main thing is to spread the word to other users who can help edit the Gospel related pages. Thanks again.
Absolon S. Kent 19:23, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:MaryMaryChristmas.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:MaryMaryChristmas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:CeCePromopic.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CeCePromopic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject CCM

I've done a lot of work on updating the Wikipedia:WikiProject Contemporary Christian music page, making it more user friendly as well as adding whole sections to the page so that we can better collaborate on improving articles under the scope of the project. Please swing on by and take a look! -- Pepsi2786 09:03, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CCM Collaboration

Hi, quick message from WikiProject: Contemporary Christian music!

We are currently in the nomination and voting stage for our first project-wide collaboration. Please stop by and nominate which article you believe we should focus on for the period of February 12-25, 2007. We look forward to your involvement! -- Pepsi2786 00:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Cokograteful.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cokograteful.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:27, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Hotcoko.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hotcoko.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:33, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Run with it

Man... I must say you picked up the torch and are well down the street and out of sight with it. I got sidelined workin' full-time. Hey do you have a MySpace page or any other way I can keep in contact with you? Souldier77 17:54, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping with the reverts on the Kierra "Kiki" Sheard article. To request banning of the user, try the Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism page. Make sure the user has received the proper number of warnings. Thanks!

Welcome to the WikiProject Gospel

Hi, and welcome to WikiProject: Gospel music! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Gospel music.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, Wikipedia:WikiProject Gospel music/Peer Review, and project-wide collaboration.
Our requests page has lists of requested articles, images, et cetera.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of our members and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Absolon S. Kent 02:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NJSCR Newsletter 2

The New Jersey State and County Route Newsletter
Issue 2 – February 2007

Issue #2

The second issue of the WP:NJSCR newsletter celebrates the promotion of Interstate 295 (Delaware-New Jersey) to good article status, as well as changes to the project on the county routes side.

Project News

Interstate 295 (Delaware-New Jersey) was upgraded to good article status. Thanks to everyone who helped out with the good article review, and the discussions on WT:IH and elsewhere.
Northenglish and EaglesFanInTampa have undertaken a project to put infoboxes on all NJSCR articles. In addition, the County routes in New Jersey article has been split into lists by county, and the infobox format for county routes has changed slightly.

For all non-500-series county routes, the state is NJ County_name, and the type is blank.
Infoboxes are set up for the following counties: Sussex, Ocean, Mercer, Cumberland, Bergen, Middlesex, Atlantic, and Monmouth.
The following counties have a full set of shield SVGs: Middlesex, Monmouth, Ocean, and Sussex

If you need help -- such as an infobox for another county, or more shield images -- don't hesitate to let Northenglish know. If you create an infobox that doesn't work properly (lots of redlinks), enclose it in an HTML comment (), and we'll get it working ASAP.

Member of the Month

The member of the month is EaglesFanInTampa, for his tireless work adding infoboxes to the 500-series county routes.

Please Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jgcarter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I used a shared network with my neighbors (I see why you could have thought it was me)...I have never done anything to be blocked from Wikipedia!

Decline reason:

Looks like you've been autoblocked. Please follow these instructions. Thanks! -- Yamla 19:55, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You need to follow the instructions. We do not do mind reading tricks, without the information from the block message we cannot see why you are blocked, without seeing why you are blocked we can do nothing to help. --pgk 20:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Cecewinans3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cecewinans3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully this request works

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Jgcarter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

69.117.138.229 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Vandalism both as IP and as logged in user.

Blocking administrator: Theresa knott (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Could you please explain the correlation between your edits to the article Kierra "Kiki" Sheard and vandalism to the same article by 69.117.138.229 (talk • contribs)? We do not play games with Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde sockpuppets on Wikipedia. -- Netsnipe ► 12:35, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I said before that I do not yet have my own network. I am using my neighbors network...it is possible that it could have been them because the network is unsecured. If I were playing Dr Jeckle and Mr Hyde, why would I revert my own edits (see Kierra "Kiki" Sheard's history page)? I am using another network at the moment so I managed to get around this block. Is there any procedure I could go through to prove it wasnt me? Jgcarter 15:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 69.117.138.229 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Netsnipe ► 04:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've been given a second chance and should this suspicious activity resume, you shall be blocked for a much longer period of time or indefinitely. So I suggest you either talk to your neighbours and get to the bottom of this, or get your own seperate internet connection. -- Netsnipe ► 04:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I'll see to it that this mixup never happens again. Jgcarter 05:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!

hey JG... welcome back! Souldier77 10:03, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Roads Newsletter Issue #1

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter

Volume 1, Issue 1

10 February 2007

About the Newsletter

Departments:	Features:
Project News	Notability of state highways is challenged
Important deletion debates
Featured subproject
Featured member
From the editor

Archives | Newsroom

Shortcut : WP:USRD/N

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 20:36, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Cecepromopic.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cecepromopic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 08:33, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NYSR-NYCR Newsletter - Issue 3

The New York State and County Route WikiProjects Newsletter

Volume 1, Issue 3

15 February 2007

About the Newsletter

Departments:	Features:
Project News	Newest state route to go airborne
Member News	Tappan Zee study progress to be released
From the Editor	Route 12B to receive safety upgrades
	Special introduction

Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line

Shortcut : WP:NYSR/N

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. --TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 06:14, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You Brought The Sunshine (Into My Life)

Hey JG, we all know that song as "You Brought The Sunshine," but all of the singles released carried that parenthetical subtitle. Check it out! :-)

http://www.vinyltap.co.uk/gallery/cl/clarkybtsml5927511760303160.jpg
http://i16.ebayimg.com/04/i/06/e4/fe/ac_1.JPG
http://i19.ebayimg.com/01/i/08/8e/b9/32_1.JPG
http://i7.ebayimg.com/02/i/000/80/4f/8cb2_1.JPG —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Souldier77 (talk • contribs) 18:55, 19 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Interstate 95 in New Jersey

Yes, but that's all made clear in the article text. The disclaimer you wrote was just plain incorrect. -- NORTH ^talk 19:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my last message was a little biting. The mainline turnpike is signed as I-95 all the way to the split with the Pennsylvania Extension; it's just the extension that is unsigned. What exactly do you feel needs to be clarified that isn't covered by explicitly separated the two segments? -- NORTH ^talk 19:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Polaron reverted you again, but check out my most recent version to see if that compromise works out for you. -- NORTH ^talk 19:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: I reverted twice, then added to add a compromise disclaimer. ;) Polaron had the third revert. -- NORTH ^talk 21:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I meant that I had two, and he had one (the third one on that page). -- NORTH ^talk 23:11, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To quote WP:3RR, "An editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, on a single page within a 24-hour period. Any editor who breaches the rule may be blocked from editing for up to 24 hours in the first instance, and longer for repeated or aggravated violations." It does help with edit warring; edit wars are generally confined to a single page, so it makes sense. -- NORTH ^talk 23:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 23:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Roads Newsletter Issue #2

File:New Jersey blank.svg

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter

Volume 1, Issue 2

24 February 2007

About the Newsletter

Departments:	Features:
Project News	Notability of state highways is upheld
Deletion debates	Kansas Turnpike is now a Good Article
Featured subproject	U.S. Roads IRC channel created
Featured member	Infoboxes and Navigation subproject started
From the editors

Archives | Newsroom

Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Apologies for the late delivery. Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

cleanup tag

On the PA Turnpike article, it mentions in the opening sentence that it is a toll highway system in Pennsylvania. Although the mainline is an Interstate, other parts of the turnpike system are not part of the Interstate system. V60 ^{VTalk · VDemolitions} 22:00, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nassau County shields

Shield delivery:

On a side note, you may want to begin archiving this talk page - it's getting a bit long. Regards, TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 08:08, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

USRD Newsletter - Issue 3

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter

Volume 1, Issue 3

10 March 2007

About the Newsletter

Departments:	Features:
Project news	Inactivity?
Deletion debates	Article Improvement Drive
Featured subproject	Good and Featured Articles
Featured member
From the editors

Archives | Newsroom

Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Active user verification

Hello, Jgcarter. Due to the high number of inactive users at WP:USRD, we are asking that you verify that you are still an active contributor of the project. To do so, please add an asterisk (*) after your name on Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Newsletter/List. Users without one by the next issue in 2 weeks will be removed off the list and off the respective road projects as well. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks. Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 22:21, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]