User talk:Jfsamper/Archive 1

Welcome

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try Wikipedia:How to edit a page.
To sign your posts (on talk pages, Articles for deletion page etc.) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes).
You can experiment in the test area.
You can get help at the Help Desk
Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Five pillars, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia:How to write a great article

Welcome!! It is always good to see a new user contributing constructively. --Gurubrahma 08:51, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for the warm welcome! I'll be sure to check those links.--Sampi 02:30, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I ran into you again. Just saw Siddhartha Buddha that you created. It was a double redirect and I fixed it. In future, pl. check for double re-directs. All the best, --Gurubrahma 17:18, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm very sorry. I meant to redirect it to Gautama Buddha like you just did. I'll be more careful in the future.--Sampi 17:40, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal

The anon you flagged had not edited since your last warning (probably the end of lunch hour in Epping). Please give me a shout if there is another problem and I will do the needful. - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 13:01, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for vigilance against vandalism!

Hi,

Thank you for reverting the vandalism to the Computer network article. Good job! Folajimi^(talk)

No problem, its all thanks to Lupin's Anti-vandal tool and his Navigation tools --– sampi (talk•contrib) 14:20, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hi Sampi, I saw your remark on User talk:212.219.92.213. What is the common way of dealing with vandalism on this version of wikipedia? On nl: we put a yellow mark on a page if it's a school, so I did this here also (using spyderweb.nl as IP-tracker), but I don't know if this is OK. Could you help me out? Bye, SietskeEN 10:16, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ásmegin

Well, their official website spells it too as Ásmegin. I am curious as to where you read of the spelling Åsmegin? Thank you for the good comment on the article. --Godtvisken 02:50, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, that is the Dutch version of the article :) Btw, thanks for the work on the English version, it is progressing --Godtvisken 04:55, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Counter Vandalism

Thankyou for helping fight vandalism in various articles! --200.118.118.2 17:22, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem!!--– sampi (talk•contrib) 20:48, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User 216.213.227.3

Hi, this user has vandalised The Beatles page, as you issued a final warning, I thought you should be informed of this Lion King 21:50, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sympohonic Metal

Last i checked i pasted merge from and to tags to both Opera Metal and Oriental Metal, into Symphonic Metal. Someone else must of deleted one.

Raising the issue is something i generally dont do, i propose it using Merge tags, as thats what i learned to do. Other than that, how do u yourself feel about the mergings, as im considering just voting Opera Metal for an AFD and then redirecting it. Ley Shade 07:28, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken in kind. Ley Shade 07:09, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User: Deathrocker Commiting Serial Vandalism And Personal Attacks

I have a problem with a user who is openly vandalisng musical articles including blanking, reverting any edit made to articles, POV pushing, ignoring WP:NPOV, personal attacks in edit summaries, and possible internet trolling.

Below is a revert war i have been involved with this user, [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34].

I stopped during this point to make comment twice on the articles talk page to the user, asking for co-operation and discussion of changes in line with Wikipedia policys, and also provided the NPOV tutorial and explained deliberatly blanking pages is vandalism, [35], [36].

I went on to make several minor edits to the article over an hour to make it less biased to any view, the cumulation of those efforts being here [37]. Immediatly the user went back to vandalisng the page starting another revert war that is in progress as i type this, using the edit summaries for personal attacks, [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46].

The user then went on to try to delete the article by claiming a merger when there was no dispute on this, which i reverted due to it being vandalism [47], [48]. This was a bad veiling though as the user never merged the articles, and instead redirected Goth Music to Goth Rock instead [49].

This user did not stop at the Gothic Music article though, he also went on to incite a revert war on the Nu Metal article, removing sourced information that User:WesleyDodds, a respectable and highly experienced involved with the article reverted. [50], [51], [52], [53]. This user then went on to vandalise the page using blanking and internet trolling methods, ignoring NPOV and i quote in this paticulat edit summary saying You are a prick to myself [54], the edit war is on these diffs, [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66].

This user has ignored all offers to work peacefully and seems instistant on blanking articles that dont agree solely with their POV and then Deleting them through a paper trail of redirects if he cannot force his POV on them. I ask for assistance in this manner before the user causes any further harm. Ley Shade

Sockpuppet Vandal

I call attention to the edit war on Classic Metal and the ongoing argument onthis section. A user is using a Sockpuppet to vandalise and openly violate the 3RR rule on articles hes been edit warring on. Hes also trying to get users and admins who dont support him permenantly blocked from Wikipedia on the basis 'They will most likely modify the contents of other articles in the future'. Please step in before this gets any further out of hand, as ive already violated WP:3RR through reverting their vandalism and pen violation of six policys, (WP:3RR, WP:BITE, WP:CITE, WP:NOR, WP:NPOV, WP:SOCK}. Ley Shade 18:00, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can write an essay no problem (I think), but out of curiousity, where do i post it? Ley Shade 09:43, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Made the essay type thing. The link is Here. Ley Shade 13:31, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deathrocker commiting serial offences within 12 hours of being unblocked

I logged all of Deathrock's offences on a page from my user page, so only myself and Admins can edit it. The link is here, [67]. I urge yew to look into this matter immediatly. 86.143.126.55 21:45, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Imperanon; Extreme metal; The Church of Satan (book); Ian Hill; Marcus Siepen; Mägo de Oz; Melodic death metal; Hollywood Undead; Windir; Blackened death metal; Skyfire; The Book of Heavy Metal; Throne of Chaos; Rap metal; Tom Allom; Traditional satanism; Mors Principium Est; Century Media Records; Nagasena

Cleanup: First Satanic Church; The Rasmus; Karla LaVey
Merge: Montgomery Bus Boycott; Yama; Symphonic black metal
Add Sources: Cameltoe; Funk metal; Huey P. Newton
Wikify: Plataea; George Kollias; Daemonium
Expand: Education in Africa; Metal-rich; Nickelodeon Kids' Choice Awards

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 11:56, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Jfsamper/Archive 1! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. mboverload 03:50, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Sorry, I guess we must have been looking at the same page and I clicked revert on the wrong version Sumergocognito 04:19, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder...

When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. — Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 21:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot to subst: here: [User talk:128.46.211.235]. Don't worry about it -- no one is perfect. Happy editing! — Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 03:13, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Smuft Characters

Why did you revert the smurf edit without an explanation on the talk page? That wasn't vandalism on my part..... 129.67.49.44 23:53, 15 May 2006 (UTC)16/5/06[reply]

Wikimedia Colombia

Buenas, me dejaron este mensaje en mi página de discusión y pensé que podría interesarle a usted también:

Desde hace un tiempo he venido cabilando con la idea de fundar un capítulo Colombiano de la Wikimedia Foundation, y para esto necesito de los comentarios y de la ayuda de los posibles interesados.

La idea del capítulo es formar una organización sin ánimo de lucro dentro de la legislación colombiana. Muy probablemente una Fundación sea el tipo de entidad más acorde a los objetivos planteados.

La invitación es para inscribir su nombre en la página de la propuesta sin ningún compromiso. También recibo comenentarios allá o en mi página de discusión sobre cualquier inquietud que tenga lugar.

En la página de la propuesta también se podrá encontrar un borrador de los posibles estatutos de la Fundación, los objetivos planteados, etc. y está abierta a cualquier tipo de contribuciones e inquietudes. Las ideas incluyen desde la canalización de fondos para la Wikimedia Foundation (los found raisings) hasta varios proyectos de promoción del conocimiento libre en Colombia (tanto por medio de los proyectos de Wikimedia, como por otros proyectos basados o no en tecnologías Wiki). Sin duda un objetivo interesante será la promoción de las lenguas indígenas colombianas con el objetivo adicional de empoderar a las culturas que las hablan de herramientas informáticas que no sean percibidas como alienantes.

Si conoce de algún otro colombiano que pueda estar interesado, no sólo wikipedistas o colaboradores de Wikimedia, agradezco la difución de este mensaje.

Gracias por la atención.

— Carlos Th 19:02 9 mar 2006 (CET)

Saludos del otro geek (su servidor),

--Fibonacci 07:06, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias por invitarme pero la verdad es que aunque el proyecto me parece bien interesante no creo que tenga mucho tiempo que le pueda dedicar. Estaré monitoreando el progreso del proyecto pero no me suscribo "oficialmente" como miembro.

Igual muchas gracias. --– sampi (talk•contrib•email) 20:39, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pues lástima que no se una... pero la invitación es de Carlos, no mía; mejor hable con él. --Fibonacci 21:04, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GRIBS removal

fraud/slander, and should have been deleted (which it was), I'll report it next time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.187.222.228 (talk • contribs)

don't be a bitch re: pub kaplan porn business

Mr Kaplan ran a failed Jew on Gentile porn business www.privatelabelporn.com. This can be found at archive.org. You can still find the models on www.fuckedcompany.com I believe. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Analan (talk • contribs)

RE:Hello

No tengo ni idea si vas a recibir esto pero por si acaso, hello y gracias por el welcome. Me siento mucho mas comodo ahora en esta comunidad.

Un cordial saludo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbr own (talk • contribs)

que mas sampi? no se si esta permitido charlar aqui pero lo voy a hacer de todas formas. que tal la uni? migue Mbr own 10:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

220.238.32.145 nonsense/test

Hey man, noticed your comment about the same time as mine at user_talk:220.238.32.145 I'd say as a first edit a test warning would be more appropriate than a nonsense warning, but it is a little gray, just throught out I'd send a message. Good to see other people patrolingRichMac 07:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pena de muerte en Colombia

Vi que quitó a Colombia de la lista de paises que no usan la pena de muerte de User:Nightstallion/death penalty. El artículo 11 de la constitucion afirma: «El derecho a la vida es inviolable. No habrá pena de muerte». No hay pena de muerte en Colombia, o me equivoco? --– sampi ^{(talk•contrib•email)} 19:54, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No se equivoca. Tiene toda la razón, y por eso es que quité a Colombia. --Fibonacci 20:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Estoy cofundido, hay varias partes de la lista. Una parte es de los paises que han abolido la pena de muerte, otra es de los paises en las que es legal y no la usan, y la ultima es paises en que es legal y la usan. Yo agregué a Colombia a la lista de paises donde la pena ha sido abolida. --– sampi ^{(talk•contrib•email)} 20:07, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Venga le aclaro. La primera sección es de los países que la han abolido con excepciones (por ejemplo para delitos en tiempo de guerra), tipo Brasil o Israel, pero no Colombia ni la mayoría de Europa. La segunda es para los países donde es legal y no la usan, tipo Rusia. La tercera es donde es legal y sí la usan, tipo EEUU o China. No hay ninguna sección para los países que la han abolido definitivamente, como Colombia. --Fibonacci 20:14, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah bueno, muchas gracias, perdon haberlo molestado. --– sampi ^{(talk•contrib•email)} 20:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fresco parce, que pa' eso estamos. --Fibonacci 20:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renfield's syndrome

Hi, I've nominated this for deletion here as I doubt it satisfies notability. Chipping in with opinions is welcomed, including reasons or evidence for keeping it.cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AKA_Film_Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:AKA_Film_Poster.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 21:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Asmegin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Asmegin.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:54, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Edits to Go (game)

Hi, I always intended to put up something on the talk page, but I got distracted by an actual go game. ><

I prefer we hash it out on the article's talk page, so it is easier for other editors to see the discussion. W (talk) 05:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:36, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

All slasher movies are stupid & fucked up which are made by retards.

117.194.226.103 (talk) 05:47, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please try not to unnecessarily use profanity in Wikipedia. Whatever you may think of the films, this is an encyclopedia. If you continue to make disruptive edits, you maybe be blocked from editing.--– sampi ^{(talk•contrib•email)} 05:57, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please, if you remove any edit ,post your clarification on articles talk page so that everyone can see your view.

                                                                                                                PSAntaal (talk) 07:48, 26 July 2014 (UTC)thankyou[reply]