User talk:Jfcreaghan

Good job overall in explaining the phenomenon of coarticulation, Jfcreaghan. You gave a clear and concise explanation of the topic.

It would be helpful for the reader to include a brief summary of the article's key points in the lead section.

There are many words throughout that should be linked to increase accessibility for people of different knowledge backgrounds or reading skill level. For example, in the lead section, it may be more accessible to students with various levels of knowledge if you link the word "phonological" to the phonology page on Wikipedia.

Under the history section, who are Menzerath and de Lacerda? It would helpful if you let readers know what expertise they have to be an authority on the subject. For example, are they linguists or cognitive psychologists?

Italics can be used more frequently throughout the put emphasis on facts for each paragraph. For example, "extent" and "direction of influence" under explanation and theory can be italicized for emphasis. This would make the page easier for students and the general public to read.Fchu6 (talk) 23:15, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Coarticulation instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jfcreaghan/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 06:21, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Jfcreaghan, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 06:21, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Jfcreaghan/sandbox

Hello, Jfcreaghan. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]