User talk:Jetpackguy48

Welcome!

Hello, Jetpackguy48, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Logdotzip, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Amortias (T)(C) 21:37, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Logdotzip

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Logdotzip, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Amortias (T)(C) 21:37, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jetpackguy48

Hello Jetpackguy48,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jetpackguy48 for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 21:46, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm Cwobeel. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Logdotzip because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. - Cwobeel (talk) 21:49, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jetpackguy48. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 21:57, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 21:58, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

{{unblock : I am a wikipedia noob pretty much and tried to redo a page so it fit in the rules and i was blocked i had the account for about an hour and im blocked this has never happened on other accounts on stuff so why now ? Jetpackguy48 (talk) 22:10, 30 September 2015 (UTC)}} Jetpackguy48 (talk) 22:10, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

{{unblock : I am a wikipedia noob pretty much and tried to redo a page so it fit in the rules and i was blocked i had the account for about an hour and im blocked this has never happened on other accounts on stuff so why now ? Jetpackguy48 (talk) 22:11, 30 September 2015 (UTC)}} Jetpackguy48 (talk) 22:11, 30 September 2015 (UTC) srry I did it twice[reply]