User talk:Jethwarp/Archive 6

Creating an article

Hi. I was about creating an article. The problem is the article was deleted post deletion discussion just because it failed marginally on BLP guidelines. There are more better sources now, if you can lend a helping hand it would be great. Seawarm (talk) 06:29, 5 July 2015 (UTC) Seawarm (talk) 06:29, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

I am a little busy in real life and may not be always available to help you. However, you should first create article in your user space. Check for reliable sources. Other editors can help you expand and edit the article in your user space, if you wish so. Once it satisfies to Wikipedia guidelines, you can move the article to main space. Thanks. Jethwarp (talk) 08:17, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. The reason why I contacted you is because you're a regular Indian wikipedian. My writing style may be have COI and that is what I am fearing all about. Seawarm (talk) 15:28, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Dandi Swami's Greek Version

What are your comments on Dandi Swami's Greek Version? Pankaj Jain 08:28, 12 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Capankajsmilyo (talk • contribs)

http://www.khabarchhe.com/magazine/history-of-lohana/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.195.242.161 (talk) 08:51, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	This is for your relentless efforts in propagating Bengal related articles ! Al-minar (talk) 03:53, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

@:@Al-minar (talk · contribs): Thank you so much. It feels always good to be appreciated. Thanks for the barnstar again.!!! Have a nice day. Jethwarp (talk) 04:02, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank You..

Thank you for you barnstar, sir. --Nizil (talk) 19:47, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Gopi Talav

User:Jethwarp/Places says that you have visited the Gopi Talav. By any chance do you have a photograph of it to upload on Commons and use in the article? Its a newly created article. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:24, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Gopi Talav I mention in my page is a pilgrimage place en route to dwarka and not one in surat. Thanks for asking but I don't have photos . Jethwarp (talk) 03:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Category:Populated places by year of establishment subcats

Several categories, including at least one which you created, have been nominated for possible merging. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:56, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Rupan Deol Bajaj for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rupan Deol Bajaj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rupan Deol Bajaj until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Uncletomwood (talk) 11:14, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 09:12, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jethwarp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://mstc.co.in/. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. I see in your talk page archives that you have been warned for copyright violations in the past, so I urge you not to do it any more, or you will be blocked from editing. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:50, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Ohh really warned, when? I created Tuna Port and Bot picked up Tuna fish.- u referring to this [1] in 2010, to be blocked for that. Wiki is a great place where u get less of appreciation and more of threats for working wasting ones valuable time. Wow !!!Jethwarp (talk) 04:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Reference tool

Thank you for creating, editing and improving Wikipedia articles. I noticed that you use Google Books for references a lot. This tool Reftag can be helpful and makes clean editable refs. For other URLs Yadkard can be helpful but may need some edit many times. Do use them and speedup your work. Regards,--Nizil (talk) 12:06, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Ranchhodlal Chhotalal

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/-First-Rancho-Ranchhodlal-Chhotalal-1823-98/articleshow/5609219.cms. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:14, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jethwarp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

TonyBallioni (talk) 17:08, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Rajnikant Ajmera for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajnikant Ajmera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajnikant Ajmera until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 14:33, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chaukalshi

The article Chaukalshi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.Hits in census-directories and other trivial name-mentions are located but that does not quite make it:)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 12:30, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Create a new Article

Hi I am Rishab Dugar

I request you to please create a page on Suswani Mataji.She is the Kuldevi of Dugar,Surana and Sankhala gotras.Her main Temple is in Morkhana.Other temples are in Nagaur, Kanwalias, Villupuram,Karnataka.

I tried to create the page but it was deleted as I was not able to properly frame the page and write the story properly as I am a new user.Plz help me u are experienced .Just create a page with basic information and main story and secure that page from deletion.And I will edit it from time to time providing necessary information and citations. King Rishab Dugar (talk) 04:02, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

http://www.missionkuldevi.in/2016/11/suswani-mata-temple-morkhana-history-hindi/

And the Kuldevi section in this link https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dugar

http://wikimapia.org/14083335/susvani-mata-ji-morkhana

I hope these links may help u King Rishab Dugar (talk) 04:16, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you in advance

King Rishab Dugar (talk) 04:17, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

You need to find reliable third party sources to create an article.I will see if there are online sources available to create the article. Jethwarp (talk) 03:37, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

@King Rishab Dugar (talk · contribs) -done check Suswani (name kept as wikipedia norms not to add Devi or Mata in heading). Regards Jethwarp (talk) 03:42, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you very much for ur help I m moving this article for changing it's title to Suswani Mataji Again I m very grateful to u thank u very much 🙏

King Rishab Dugar (talk) 04:49, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shakti Singh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shakti Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DannyS712 (talk) 20:46, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jethwarp. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Devyani Khobragade

I'm not sure why you requested the speedy deletion of Devyani Khobragade, your rationale made no sense and was malformed. You said that "the page Devyani Khobargode was moved as per this discussion", which should have had no bearing on the status of this article, since the page was also not moved (I'm not sure why it would have been) and there would have been no reason to delete the redirect even if it had been moved. Please explain.--Auric talk 11:04, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Earlier the page was created as Devyani Khobargode but was moved to Devyani Khobragade incident as per discussion, so I dont know why someone again created Devyani Khobargode page. As per AfD it merits deletion. However, I noted you created a redirect for now. Ideally you should have put your argument on article talk page and let an Admin decide on CSD tag. Jethwarp (talk) 11:28, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Rollback usage

Please do not use rollback when the edit you are reverting is not blatant vandalism. Rollback is not to be used to gain an upper hand in edit wars, doing so can lead to revocation of the permission. Regards.  << FR ^(mobileUndo) 10:28, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

@FR30799386 (talk · contribs) - In first case AfD nominations should not be reverted, you have reverted my AfD tag twice. I am still not able to understand what made you to revert AfD nomination tag ? I was already in talk with one Admin to resolve the issue that deletion link is going to one old Afd Jethwarp (talk) 10:30, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

I didn't get the ping. I have created Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Devyani_Khobragade_(2nd_nomination) for you, please add your rationale.

Looking at it from my perspective, adding a malformed AfD template to an article which has tons of sources after trying unsuccessfully to nominate it for CSD makes you look like an editor who is out to push a POV. Over that, the usage of rollback in this case wasn't appropriate. Sorry for the inconvenience caused to you. Regards. << FR ^(mobileUndo) 11:47, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Well it was sensible and nice of you to create manual AfD tag to undo what you did. However, your perspective is malformed It is a norm if CSD is not successful AFD should be the next option and it is always for healthy discussion. I will put my rationale of AFD. When someone reverts AFd rollback is appropriate, you did things in haste. RegardsJethwarp (talk) 12:01, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

No it doesn't, WP:ROLLBACKUSE states the use-cases of rollback. There isn't any mention of using rollback to revert the removal of the AfD tag. I agree that my actions where in haste and I should have exercised caution while making my edits. However, that cannot be used as an explanation of your edits. Your inability to understand this is more concerning than the revert itself. I hope we can settle this amicably. << FR ^(mobileUndo) 12:56, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

P.S : I personally would have removed the AfD tag while I waited for an admin to help me out with my edits. << FR ^(mobileUndo) 12:56, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

For me it is already settled, I always assume good faith and avoid discussions on issues that are trivial and avoid arguments. Have a nice day, Bye & ThanksJethwarp (talk) 13:02, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Roop Chand Joshi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roop Chand Joshi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roop Chand Joshi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∯WBG^converse 04:42, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Template usage

The addition of a maintenance template in Special:Diff/895784161/896569925 was in error, and the template has been removed. Please make sure to read the template documentation and tag responsibly. Best, Sam Sailor 17:49, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User Jethwarp/PTRCJ

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User Jethwarp/PTRCJ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 01:16, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

I've moved the page to User:Jethwarp/PTRCJ, where I think it was intended to be created, and removed the speedy deletion request. ----Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:04, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians interested in the French Empire has been nominated for discussion

Category:Wikipedians interested in the French Empire, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:19, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Roop Chand Joshi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roop Chand Joshi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roop Chand Joshi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 04:46, 24 September 2019 (UTC)