User talk:Seawarm

Welcome!

Hello, Seawarm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Seawarm (talk) 07:39, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seawarm, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Seawarm! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 21:36, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ridgley Middle School

Hi! I noticed that you nominated Ridgley Middle School for speedy deletion as per WP:A7. A7 does not apply to this article because it is about an educational institution, which is an exception for A7. Please take another look at the criteria for A7, as it is intentionally defined narrowly to exclude most articles. Thanks for patrolling new pages! ~ Rob^Talk 15:52, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@BU Rob13: I believe, the article needs to be drafted properly in a draft space then moved to main space. The education institute clearly fails WP:N Thanks.Seawarm (talk) 15:53, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it does not meet notability criteria, which is why I boldly redirected it to the school district's webpage (considering that it had no content anyway). Even if it did not meet notability criteria and deserved deletion, though, the appropriate process would be WP:AfD or WP:PROD since it was not eligible for A7 or any other speedy deletion criteria. ~ Rob^Talk 16:01, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gotri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Garba. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Bot. I have made the changes Seawarm (talk) 13:20, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shekhar Chatterjee (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shekhar Chatterjee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 22:35, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sanjoy64. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 23:09, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 23:26, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]