User talk:JetLover/Archive 4

Signpost updated for September 17th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 38	17 September 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor: Reader survey
Wikimedia treasurer expected to depart soon	WikiWorld comic: "Sarah Vowell"
News and notes: Template standardization, editing patterns, milestones	Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:09, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Israeli pal

Have you seen [1]? Cheers ~ Riana ⁂ 23:40, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries :) ~ Riana ⁂ 23:45, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

I'm so sorry! I thought that by doing that it would help you. I'll never edit your userspace again. Promise! :( --Angel David (talk•contribs) 00:25, 19 September, 2007 (User Talker Contributor)

RfC

Hello. I saw you made this comment at RfC. Please note that blocks are not punitive; they are preventive. --Ag ü eybaná 23:27, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you did say "He should be punnished for his behavior." BTW, you misspelled "punished". --Ag ü eybaná 23:32, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No prob :-) Happy editing! --Ag ü eybaná 00:19, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Virus on the tissue

He hasn't done anything wrong since I unblocked him on 9/15. I will always give someone a second chance if they apologize and promise to stop. No third chances, though. NawlinWiki 01:17, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now blocked again. Thanks for the report. NawlinWiki 22:02, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Hi, I've found a problem with your signature's coding. The bold/italics formatting starts within the span tag, but ends outside of it, which somehow causes the blue color formatting to not end after your sig. I suggest you change it to this, which works correctly and is slightly shorter, because it avoids the font tag:

<span style="font-family:Arial;color:blue"> '''''Cheers,[[User:JetLover|Je]][[User talk:JetLover|t]][[Special:Contributions/JetLover|Lover]] ([[User:JetLover/False reverts|Report a mistake]])'''''</span>

Thanks, Dapete ばか 11:32, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barneca RfA spam

Thank you for participating in my RfA. I appreciate your taking the time to comment, and plan on learning from the experience and keeping the criticism in mind. If, in the future, you see me doing something that still concerns you, please let me know about it. --barneca (talk) 13:17, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The now-traditional RFA thank-spam

Click there to open your card! → → →

Dear JetLover,

Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 83 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutrals. No matter if you voted (I mean, "!voted") support or oppose, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm new, remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them, and if I do anything wrong, feel free to add to the permanent chorus of disapproval on my talk page. Special thanks to Walton^One and Dihydrogen Monoxide for nominating me.

iridescent (talk to me!) 20:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Credits

This design was ~~brazenly stolen from~~ inspired by Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor's RFA Thanks, which in turn was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks.

Anon User Vandalism

Take a look at history of the page Talk:List of light heavyweight boxing champions to see the anonymous vandal who is calling names and switching IPs.MKil 21:55, 20 September 2007 (UTC)MKil[reply]

RFA Thanks!

Thanks for your participation for my RFA bid and for your support.--JForget 23:20, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On a side note is WoW still causing trouble here? I remember seeing those XXX on wheels move but haven't reverting anything of him, so maybe I will have the occasion to the meet him at times, since he had already multiple sleeper accounts.--JForget 23:22, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whether if it was a question for myself or in general, I did pay for the internet and cable, so I would say yes for the WHOIS server (if including related costs). Unfortunately I've dropped out in computer sciences courses before switching to social sciences, so advanced elements in computers networks, i'm quite poor on that.--JForget 00:05, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't exactly, as I pay a general amount of money per month for various stuff, so I cannot know the exact. And also I'm sure that there are variations depending on who is the provider. The Internet, if I remember (with Videotron) was something being 15$ and 20$ and I'm sure that there are other costs I don't know. So I cannot give an exact price especially since it varies on the country (US, UK, Australia, France, Germany, etc etc.) Let's face it, the computer, cable, Internet, and other gadgets, overall it is in reality quite an expensive cost in total - all my tools just for access the Internet was over 1000$ CDN (actually it doesn't matter the currency since the CDN loonie is at par with the US dollar although well behind the Euro).

Maybe someone else can mention the exact total costs for the WHOIS, If I'm missing something--JForget 00:32, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stuff I tag is generally nonsense or self-promotion and I message the article creator.

I have almost 6000 edits to my name; please give me some credit? HalfShadow 03:05, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My point is, since the stuff I'm tagging is almost always instant-delete material, leaving a edit summary is mildly pointless; as soon as an admin sees it, it's gone. I mean, when you're tagging something like a page with 'Potato' posted 500 times in a row it's kind of a given, right? HalfShadow 03:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew de Morton

Hey, I noticed you tagged that article as db-repos, although it was speedily deleted before. The template should be used only for AfD articles; I made the same mistake before and was called on it... I changed it to db-bio instead. -- dockingman^talk 03:33, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: removal of CheckUser request

Thanks for letting me know. Its not that big of a deal, especially since it doesn't appear the user wants to regain control of the account. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 01:26, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

heh...

I'm not back...well...maybe I am...but I just felt like reminiscing ;). Peace. Spartan-James 03:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:DurhamCollegeGuy

Came across DurhamCollegeGuy on RC Patrol, seems like they are a sock of MascotGuy. Oyster guitarist 15:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

userpage

why does your userpage and user talk page get vandalized so much?--Blue-Eyes Gold Dragon 10:54, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thats crazy--Blue-Eyes Gold Dragon 01:00, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MfD edit

I think your edit to the chickenshit MfD dorked up the formatting, like it removed your signature and such. Did you make a mistake? Milto LOL pia 02:09, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry!

Sorry it took me this long to respond to you! I'm really, really sorry! I've been busy with school and such and I haven't had much time for Wiki at all. I hope to be more active in the future, but I don't know. I might be gone until next summer. O_O I hope not, but we'll have to see.Silver seren^C 22:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Well, i'm not really "back". I just realized that I should login to check on anything that might have appeared on my talk page. And I guess I was about 10 days too late. o_o; I can't be on for long.Silver seren^C 22:16, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Templates

Don't know if you saw my reply, so I'll post it here as well, hehheh. I don't mind at all, and they are all templates, if you want to see what they all look like, you can find them at User:ArielGold/Boxes. Feel free to nick whatever you like! And if you want to see the template for a specific one just holler and I'll link to the template page if you want. ^Ariel♥Gold 00:13, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's hard

When somone does something that critisizes my work. I get fustrated. I should not have done that but when somone does something you know. There is zero tolerance. It's like taking away a gift. And I hid the "grrr" in order to stop my self from offense, I just don't like Satan. --Angel David 22:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN question

Hello,

I'd like to ask User:Bishonen to look into Talk:Kiev/naming/anyone other than Horlo Irpen or Reginmund as it looks abusive and prejudicial, since he created Talk:Kiev/naming 132.205.44.5 22:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for September 24th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost


Volume 3, Issue 39	24 September 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor: Survey results
Wikimedia announces plans to move office to San Francisco	WikiWorld comic: "Ambigram"
News and notes: Times archives, conferences, milestones	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View

Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 02:11, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right

Jetlover I am going to try to quit personal attacks.--Angel David 22:39, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Urgent request-Comment on Article for Deletion

Hi there - Thank you for your participation in the Bluemarine request for comment. On a related, but broader note, I thought perhaps you'd like to comment on the proposed deletion of a proposed "Dubious Sources" category? This isn't discussed as it should be within Wikipedia, in my opinion.Typing Monkey - ^{(type to me)} 03:46, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your Signature

How did you get it to look like that?-—Monnitewars ^(talk) 17:49, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile

Cheers, Lights (♣ • ♦) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Signpost updated for October 03, 2007

The Wikipedia Signpost


Volume 3, Issue 40	1 October 2007	About the Signpost

WikiWorld comic: "Buttered cat paradox"	News and notes: Commons uploaders, Wikimania 2008/2009, milestones
Wikimedia in the News	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View

Shortcut : WP:POST

Automatically delivered by COBot 02:25, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :D

Thanks for the barnstar!

Thanks for awarding me a barnstar! I've always tried hard to revert vandalism (even as an IP) and now I finally get recognised for it! Thanks again! NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 22:38, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you addopt me?

omg i suck so much at editing i need help can you addopt me and how do i join wiki wargames project?--Umm killer 20:37, 4 October 2007 (UTC) RESPOND PLZ!--Umm killer 21:32, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Respond Plz!--Umm killer 21:41, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please be patient. I am doing two things. Cheers,Je t Lover (Report a mistake) 21:43, 4 October 2007 (UTC) RESPODM —Preceding unsigned comment added by Umm killer (talk • contribs) 23:23, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Steer clear of this editor, JetLover. --The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 23:27, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ya gona respond back to me any time??? iam getting bored waiting —Preceding unsigned comment added by Umm killer (talk • contribs) 00:23, 5 October 2007 (UTC) How do you make the defcon thing cahnge automatic??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Umm killer (talk • contribs) 01:23, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Thanks. I moved it to my userpage. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 03:50, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One of these days I will bring myself to accept that button. It always slips my mind. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 03:56, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SMILE! n_n

Blue-Eyes Gold Dragon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

O_O thats a lot of smiles! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blue eyes gold dragon (talk • contribs) 00:57, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

userboxes

Sorry about my talk page, It's kindof confusing ^_^ I fixed it up, don't worry. Sure, I'd like to try that template thing, but I'm still a bit "foggy" on it --PolarWolf ( grrr... ) 22:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

actually (I just read your message again lol), sure! I would love it if you put them (or it) into template form, thanks :) --PolarWolf ( grrr... ) 22:46, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! ^_^ --PolarWolf ( grrr... ) 22:57, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		Polarwolf's Hidden Page
		Good Job! You've found my page! --PolarWolf ( grrr... )

LOL I love your joke! ^_^ --PolarWolf ( grrr... ) 23:13, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no prob lol :) --PolarWolf ( grrr... ) 23:18, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks JL!

Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{subst:Vangel}}! Into The Fray ^T/C 01:06, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! (: Cheers,Je t Lover (Report a mistake) 00:39, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

Hi there, I was looking around when I noticed that you just got your 50th vandalism of your user page so congratulations! You must be doing something very right so as to annoy so many wrong people. I hope that everything will go well and that you will reach your 100th shortly. I also hope that I will get this much attention too one day :) Take care, Kudret abi^Talk 06:02, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool!. I'm still working my way there. Oyster guitarist 14:41, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It was quite a prize! Cheers,Je t Lover (Report a mistake) 00:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you must be doing something good ^_^--Blue-Eyes Gold Dragon 10:47, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New userpage

Hi JetLover, I made you a userpage design that you might like here. If you like it, just replace your userpage with {{subst:User:Lights/Sandbox}}. Cheers, Lights (♣ • ♦) 22:17, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you an Admin?

And if your not why are you not one? I think you would make a great admin/mod--Blue-Eyes Gold Dragon 11:02, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

well i went through all your archives looking for something and notesed you havent had a single warning/ban (unlike me :( ) (dam 3 revert thing) Ill vote for you if you try :)--Blue-Eyes Gold Dragon 01:40, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dd :D--Blue-Eyes Gold Dragon 01:48, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sorry about that ^^ O_o what happen there? lol--Blue-Eyes Gold Dragon 01:49, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Question

Well, honestly, I've seen far worse. But, oh, well. --Ag ü eybaná 00:06, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Odd request

Strangest request I've had in a while, but I see no harm. You are blocked for one minute.--Kubigula (talk) 04:11, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now I'm curious - how did it look?--Kubigula (talk) 04:14, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Man, you didn't have to be blocked to see how the message looks like. Just take a look at MediaWiki:Blockedtext :-) --Ag ü eybaná 01:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank you very much for the barnstar. Just doin' what needs doin', but I appreciate being appreciated. Cheers! ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 03:50, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What the....

This guy that vandalized your page is weird "Im just trying to make wikipedia a better place :)" lol you have some people that hate you, or one person that hates you with a proxy--Blue-Eyes Gold Dragon 05:53, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Code Lyoko characters

Please note that Afd is not the place for merger proposals. The way to propose a merge is described at WP:MERGE. --Agüeybaná 03:59, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

declining

Hello JetLover, thank you for offering to nominate me for administrator. I'm honoured by your request, but I feel I should decline. While I feel fairly confident in my knowledge of policies, and while I'm sure I can handle the inevitable stresses of adminship, I'm just not interested in becoming an admin at the present time. While that feeling might change in the future, I tend to doubt that it will. I'm sorry to disappoint you. Thank you all the same. --Kyoko 08:08, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scandinavian Bunkering

The figures make them look like they are a large notable company but when you do the conversion, 40m Kroner is only about $7.3m (£3.6m) Not what you'd call big turnover for the industry they're in? ---- WebHamster 23:08, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aplogies for putting the message in the wrong place, I got distracted. Multi-tasking isn't my forté :). AfD is one way to go yes, but there was no assertion of notability, nor any 3rd party sources in that article. Looked like a CSD to me. It doesn't look like it's a company that stands out from any other of its type. ---- WebHamster 23:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

as the reviewing admin, there was definitely enough information to pass speedy, and I would have removed the tag except another admin already had done so. . Any plausible assertion of notability is enough, and the criteria the above editor has been using are--in a word--just plain wrong, according to WP:CSD. There need not be sources, and asserting any significant role in an industry is enough. But whether the company is in fact notable may be another matter.DGG (talk) 15:30, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:212.139.68.157

I understand your point, but it's an anonymous IP with no prior edits. WHOIS shows it as belonging to Tiscali, a large ISP in England. It's far from clear that this would even be the same people using the IP the next time. If it is, I agree a much longer block will be in order then. Thanks, NawlinWiki 00:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re Porn poster

Hello, recently you blocked an IP for posting pornographic images in the sandbox. He has a dynamic IP and is coming back. He also vandalized my userpage and is making the sandbox Hustler magazine! Perhaops you could keep an eye on it. Thanks. Cheers,Je t Lover (Report a mistake) 01:18, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. User:Zzuuzz is dealing w/ it. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 01:23, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It might be

People follow it and it shows how to behave with other Wikipedians. So it is in every way, a guideline.--Angel David 02:01, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know four...why?--Angel David 02:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um, Okay, actually I changed my mind.--Angel David 02:09, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE Edit summaries

do you mean on my own user page or in wikipeida articles? or both?--Blue-Eyes Gold Dragon 04:17, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet?

On User talk:Bobo192, JetLover said:
Hello, Bobo192. Would it be allowed by policy for me to make a sockpuppet to maintain the sandbox?

Sockpuppet? I don't see that as being the case. Having a second account for a single purpose, where that purpose is neither malicious in intent or is for a certain place where it is not pushing any form of agenda seems fine with me. In fact, given that the account will hopefully be put to good use, there should be no problem.

For that matter, I had completely forgotten that Sandbot had ceased running by itself. Maybe it's worth asking whether it's of any use for User:Uncle G's 'bot to reset the sandbox and its related pages on more than a once-a-day-at-1am basis. Bobo . 04:07, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On User talk:Bobo192, JetLover said:
Thank you. I am going to use it to re-add the header. Happy editing!

That's perfectly legit, I've found myself resetting the sandbox manually on several occasions and I know how painful a task it can be when inappropriate content arises on the page. So long as you only carry out the tasks which you claim you will with the account, I don't see how anyone could be against it - all I would suggest is that you put a message on the page of the account saying, "This is an alternative account of JetLover, and I am using it for [this] purpose and [this] purpose only." Bobo . 04:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for October 15th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 42	15 October 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor: Brion Vibber interview
Wikimania 2008 awarded to Alexandria	Board meeting held, budget approved
Wikimedia Commons reaches two million media files	San Francisco job openings published
Community sanction noticeboard closed	Bot is approved to delete redirects
License edits under consideration to accommodate Wikipedia	WikiWorld comic: "Soramimi Kashi"
News and notes: Historian dies, Wiki Wednesdays, milestones	Wikimedia in the News
WikiProject Report: Military history	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:40, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup

Hmmm

My edits seem to be quite strange to Jet Lover.--Angel David 01:01, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFC on User talk page comment removal?

Can you direct me to this RFC? I was surprised that they now allow editors to remove talk page comments without any recourse... some editors jumped on me over this issue, when it seems to be the common practice for a number of years now. --Madchester 01:23, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chya

You probably said that becuase of the "Welome" and waring icon. And here's the problem you think that you can just say oh "this isn't wiki", "we don't need this here". I tis content it's no a Wiki fashion station. Sorry, are these attacks?--Angel David 20:08, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why

Don't do this to me please. Why are you trying to do this? I try to be my best and you have done is try to delete an article because you don't want it there critizing my edits. You are stopping me at trying to fit in as a friend to all and you make that. This can't be done. For the record, I've quit personal attacks so I'm not saying this in a shout-like way.--Angel David 21:24, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David, this is an encyclopedia, not Myspace. You don't get it. At all. I'm not going to hesitate to block you if you keep this up. --Maxim_{(talk) (contributions)} 21:26, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whar happens if an RFC fails?--Angel David 21:38, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's an invalid question. An RfC is a Request for Comment. Various users will comment, and if enough users certify a dispute, it will continue. The point of one is to convince the user in question to change their behaviour. --Maxim_{(talk) (contributions)} 21:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now I'm just confused.--Angel David 21:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But

I'm only 11--Angel David 21:46, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an encyclopedia. Not your webhost. And I kinda don't care too, too much whether you're 11. I judge someone by their contributions, not age. I won't treat you any differently whether you were 11, 18, 27, or 66. Your contributions have demonstrated that you use Wikipedia as a way to propagate your faith and as your webhost. You're not contributing here. Maxim_{(talk) (contributions)} 21:50, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beacause

They are. You have no idea what your talking about. How would likem it I put delete on your favorite page?--Angel David 22:19, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh really tell me what rule I broke. At the bottom I wa sgoing to put sommething so peaceful. I planned this and I worked hard for it and I get you helping a strange editor try to delete it?--Angel David 22:24, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Angel David

That's funny; I got your message just as I finished commenting on the MfD. I'm willing to mentor him; I'll leave a message in his page. Thanks! Love, Neranei (talk) 23:02, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just posted on his talk page, is he around right now? Love, Neranei (talk) 23:05, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've commented on the RfC, I also told him to reply on his talk page. (You *can* do that when you're blocked, right?) Love, Neranei (talk) 23:08, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again; Friday just commented on the RfC. Love, Neranei (talk) 23:11, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

Hi Jet Lover, I didn't create the RfA, you can see the discussion about it at the top of my talk page, here. Cheers! Ariel♥Gold 02:00, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Your attitude

You may not be aware, but I have participated in several FPCs, and that image is certainly not of FP quality. Your message, categorized by Ryan as an "outburst", was embarrassing to your figure. You're the one that needs an attitude check here, man. I'm truly sorry that Wikipedia has to put up with people like you. Try to think before you leave such messages if the man you are addressing did it in good faith, or just to screw with you. If you would have done this, you would have known that it was the former. --Agüeybaná 00:48, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]