User talk:Jesuslord4ever
can unlock the chronoleaks.com its extremely harsh from u to block it. i have no personol affiliation with the site. i Just tryimg to contribute. the links where dead. all u find is to block . wtf .unblock it damn t — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesuslord4ever (talk • contribs) 10:31, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- Please see this thread for the discussion that lead to the blacklist. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate - 10:47, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia has rules. If you want to edit it, you follow the rules. One of the rules is civility in discussions. Break it often enough and you get blocked. Cheers, • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 15:21, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
I can see its so easy to click block right ? Being registered on wiki for a long while does not make it belongs to some one. I agree i faulted, but you too. You say you acted according to the rules i notice the gateway your created on wiki. blocking a site can be fun for you but it isnt for others , you get it ? Being admin dont give every right. Working at the NSA does give some one the right to delete the every putin email registed. Or making his mails public to your get what i mean ?. You think you acted right ? Noo your didnt, your acted uporn emotion, and an elite admin does not act on emoting. PaleoMeanate you Pseudo yourself right, remember online your never know with who you are dealing, so be kind to everybody because you dont know if its a test or not
- Your response above is objectionable under the civility rules. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 09:48, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Notice
[edit]There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. —PaleoNeonate - 06:30, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/Local/chronoleaks.com
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/Local/chronoleaks.com, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 17:34, 21 June 2017 (UTC)