User talk:Jersay

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to List of terrorist incidents, 2008. Lest it be construed as vandalism. Thank you. Lihaas (talk) 11:06, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Terrorist Incidents 2008

Hi, you've recently been contributing a lot to the list. However, your citations are not being done properly. This messes up the reference list at the bottom of the page. Please consult Wikipedia:Citation_templates for help. Thanks. --RDavi404 (talk) 22:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of terrorist incidents, 2008, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 20:19, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to List of terrorist incidents, 2004 constitutes deletion of content. Please do not delete content. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 21:24, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please do not copy-and-paste content, as you did to list of terrorist incidents, 2008. I have reverted the insertion, but I will replace it appropriately. When writing an article or part of one, be sure always to put the cited information into your own words. Thank you. ~A H 1^(TCU) 23:52, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. First of all, could you clarify what you mean by "we"? Also, copying the entire news article, or even a section of it, can be too much information. It is also required that all text inserted into the article be not copyrighted (it is not plagarism we are worried about, it is copyright issues), see WP:GFDL and WP:COPYVIO. Thanks. ~A H 1^(TCU) 00:21, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of terrorist incidents, 2008

G'day, I've undone your change to this article as you removed a chunk of text that was accompanied by a source, and you didnt use make use of the edit summary box to describe why you removed it. If it really doesnt belong in that article, feel free to remove it again and either use and edit summary to describe why, or just leave a note here about it and we can discuss it further.

If you need a hand understanding anything, let me know and I'll try to explain things a little. Cheers, John Vandenberg ^(chat) 15:52, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss your extensive proposed revisions to the 'list of wars' series on the appropriate talk pages before implementing them. AlexTiefling (talk) 17:54, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I repeat, please discuss before making radical edits. AlexTiefling (talk) 15:42, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2008 Jamaica Slum War

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 2008 Jamaica Slum War, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

This is copied verbatim from 2008 invasion of Anjouan, which is nowhere near Jamaican slums. This is a hoax that needs to be deleted

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Spencer^Merry^Christmas! 17:18, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've deleted it. Spencer^Merry^Christmas! 20:47, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of wars 2003–2008

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of wars 2003–2008, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of wars 2003–2008. Thank you. TheFEARgod (Ч) 20:58, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of wars 2009–current

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of wars 2009–current, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of wars 2009–current. Thank you. TheFEARgod (Ч) 20:58, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mexican Drug War

How about expanding the section Mexican Drug War#U.S.A. death toll. It does have a geopolitical implication, and your topic of interest fits better. BatteryIncluded (talk) 02:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Second Northern Ireland Revolt

Speedy deletion of Second Northern Ireland Revolt

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Second Northern Ireland Revolt, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Porturology (talk) 01:05, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Second Northern Ireland Revolt

I have nominated Second Northern Ireland Revolt, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Northern Ireland Revolt. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. AlexTiefling (talk) 20:01, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:27, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AE sanctions

The List of wars 2003–current article is currently subject to Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/The_Troubles#Final_remedies_for_AE_case, as laid out during a previous WP:AE case that closed October 05, 2008. If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the guidelines laid out in the above link. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it on this talk page first.

All articles related to The Troubles, defined as: any article that could be reasonably construed as being related to The Troubles, Irish nationalism, the Baronetcies, and British nationalism in relation to Ireland falls under WP:1RR. When in doubt, assume it is related.

The List of ongoing conflicts article is currently subject to Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/The_Troubles#Final_remedies_for_AE_case, as laid out during a previous WP:AE case that closed October 05, 2008. If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the guidelines laid out in the above link. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it on this talk page first.

All articles related to The Troubles, defined as: any article that could be reasonably construed as being related to The Troubles, Irish nationalism, the Baronetcies, and British nationalism in relation to Ireland falls under WP:1RR. When in doubt, assume it is related. O Fenian (talk) 01:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of terrorist incidents, 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of terrorist incidents, 2009. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wikifan12345 (talk) 21:35, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of wars 2003–current‎

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles . Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. O Fenian (talk) 01:22, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Republican Violence in Northern Ireland

A tag has been placed on Republican Violence in Northern Ireland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. AlexTiefling (talk) 15:36, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Paramilitary violence in Northern Ireland

A tag has been placed on Paramilitary violence in Northern Ireland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. O Fenian (talk) 23:10, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Terrorist attacks 2009

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to List of terrorist incidents, 2009, you will be blocked from editing. You've removed the sourced content 3 times. Consider this a final warning before I seek an administrator's opinion.Wikifan12345 (talk) 01:00, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Northern Ireland 2009 Paramilitary Conflict

A tag has been placed on Northern Ireland 2009 Paramilitary Conflict requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. O Fenian (talk) 14:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reposting material that has been deleted after a deletion discussion as you did at Northern Ireland 2009 Paramilitary Conflict. Such behaviour may result in a block preventing you from editing Wikipedia. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing privileges have been suspended for a short while

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Despite being advised of the special enforcement of editing restrictions in the section "AE enforcement" above, you have made edits regarding acts of violence relating to articles covered by The Troubles ArbCom with the same focus. You have therefore violated the 1RR ruling, even though the edits were not to the same article. I have enacted a 24 hour block, and would caution you against continuing to disregard the warnings and comments you have received over the situation. LessHeard vanU (talk) 17:32, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Noticeboard

I've filed a complaint regarding your latest edits at List of terrorist incidents, 2009. Wikifan12345 (talk) 19:38, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Guadeloupe Revolution

I have nominated Guadeloupe Revolution, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guadeloupe Revolution. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. AlexTiefling (talk) 21:50, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sectarian violence

The killings in Pakistan and Somalia constitute terrorism. Sectarian violence is not necessarily separate from terrorism, so just because one act of violence might qualify that article does not mean it should be excluded from this. Please end your reverts without discussion. This would be your 5th time Jersay. Wikifan12345 (talk) 20:55, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Noticeboard

1. Wikifan12345 (talk) 21:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at List of terrorist incidents, 2009

See {{uw-3rr}}. You may be blocked if you continue to make changes on this article without using the Talk page to try to get other editors to support your views. EdJohnston (talk) 01:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Skip the emailing. There is a talk page which is designated for discussions. I'm not going to seek your approval for every edit I make if a source verifies. You have consistently removed cited information from the article, refused to join talk discussions, and have yet to respond to the reports filed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. I suggest you refrain from making controversial edits (like reverts) and accusing editors of vandalism before making nice. :D Wikifan12345 (talk) 04:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Terrorism

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to List of terrorist incidents, 2009, you will be blocked from editing. Wikifan12345 (talk) 20:17, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Edit warring. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

Continuing to revert without discussing at List of terrorist incidents, 2009. Per a complaint at WP:ANI#Continued disruption. See warnings above. EdJohnston (talk) 21:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear God

It doesn't matter how many attacks occur each year. If an attack is considered terrorism by the publishing source or clearly qualifies (i.e, roadside bomb blows up unsuspecting commando), we include it. You're this close to being banned from the article so end the reverts. Let me put it in a way you might understand: Do. not. revert. for. any. reason. whatsoever. Consider this a final, final, final warning before I go to noticeboards, for the 3rd time. Wikifan12345 (talk) 04:59, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing privileges have been suspended indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

Wikipedia is a co-operative project, in which communication plays an important part in arriving at consensus as to what is appropriate to be included - and the usual basis is that of reliably sourced third party references. You have recently, and perhaps longer, been editing to your personal understanding of what is appropriate despite the opposition of many of your co-editors. Your edits have recently become so disruptive to the collegiate editing of the encyclopedia that I have now enacted an indefinite block on this account. You may wish to consider your approach to contributing to the project before making any appeal. LessHeard vanU (talk) 13:54, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Third Eritrean Civil War

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Third Eritrean Civil War. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third Eritrean Civil War. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]