User talk:JenniferL24

Reply

Thank you for responding to my conflict of interest query, but note that in the interests of transparency you should state any connection on the article talk page; please read the guidance below:

When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.

Your text was entirely without in-line references except for his own papers, referenced to themselves. That's completely the wrong way round. Anything you write about a person needs verification, except their publications, which should just be listed as such without references. See Emma Louisa Turner#Publications
He's almost certainly notable, but we need to verify what you claim with independent third-party sources, which doesn't include his own papers or interviews with him None of the facts you claim have in-line references.

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

An unsourced text dump citing only his work looks spammy

There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.

You had several.

You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

I didn't check all the text, but some at least was a verbatim copy from here, © Stanford University

You had no wikilinks at all, eg Stanford University, California, National Academy of Engineering.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. If you are writing about yourself , or someone you know as a friend, colleague, client, employer or relative, you have a conflict of interest, and you must disclose the nature of that COI. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard G. Luthy has been accepted

Richard G. Luthy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 20:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]