User talk:JenniferAnneBaker

Next steps after creating draft

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I'm so sorry, I am sure I should be able to figure this out- but I've created a biography page for Kitty Black Perkins, an African American Barbie designer, and I am not sure what steps to take next. Do I continue to edit it? Do I ever submit it for review? THANKS.

JenniferAnneBaker (talk) 14:55, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You can submit your draft for a review by adding {{subst:submit}} to the very top, including the curly brackets. Before you do so, however, you may want to work on the references. Not all of those you currently cite are considered reliable by Wikipedia's standards, including Wikipedia itself. GoUpstate.com doesn't seem to mention Perkins at all; neither does MTV News. That leaves you with rather few reliable sources that discuss Perkins in any detail. On an unrelated note, you may want to add metadata to your references so they're not just bare URLs: Author, title, publication date, publisher, page number if applicable, ... See WP:Referencing for beginners on how to easily create nicely-formatted footnotes. Huon (talk) 15:25, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks so much. Makes sense- so the links need to be about her, not for example, her school. I will add the metadata. Thank you so much for this help!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kitty Black Perkins (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kitty Black Perkins and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam ^Sing! 20:46, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! JenniferAnneBaker, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- Sam ^Sing! 20:46, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kitty Black Perkins has been accepted

Kitty Black Perkins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 (talk) 17:37, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Armand Derfner (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

might be notable, but it hasn't yet been shown. What were his cases before the SC?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Armand Derfner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Armand Derfner, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 22:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Armand Derfner

Hello, JenniferAnneBaker. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Armand Derfner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 05:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Armand Derfner

Hello, JenniferAnneBaker. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Armand Derfner".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:30, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]