User talk:Jemptymethod

Hello, Jemptymethod. You have new messages at JohnCD's talk page.
Message added 11:27, 23 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Your example on Légal_Trap

Unfortunately the board does not make sense, as Qxd1 is mate in 1. I tried to look up your source but couldn't find the relevant game. I reverted the example for now, but feel free to add it when we figure out the correct board! Isaac (talk) 01:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two minor pieces attack White's King

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

White's queen is immune from capture by either of Black's minor pieces in analysis that dates to Howard_Staunton's Chess-Player's Handbook, 2nd ed., 1868 which further proceeds: 8...Qd4 9. Qxg4 Qxe5+ 10. Kf1 f5 11. Qf3 Ne4 12. d3 when the author proclaims "you (White) have a fine game," an evaluation supported by the strongest chess engines circa 2016 after further continuing 12...c5 13.dxe4 c4 14.exf5 Qd6 and White has several winning options including 15.Bf4

May 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Reductio ad absurdum. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Chetvorno^TALK 19:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SmithProject

The article SmithProject has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSOFT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]