User talk:Jemappelleungarcon

Hello, Jemappelleungarcon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
Check out some of these pages:
- Introduction to Wikipedia | Tutorial
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out Wikipedia:Questions, stop by and/or ask a question at the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Balaji ^{(Let's talk)} 06:36, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't I edit some particular pages?

Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.

Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?

Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.

How do I create an article?

See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.

How do I create citations?

Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?

A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

September 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you may be blocked from editing. That includes POV pushing through adding selective unrelated links to "see also" sections in various articles. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 11:38, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Hi. Edits should be marked as minor only when there is basically no change in the meaning of content and there is no possibility of controversy. This is especially important (in terms of not appearing to covertly push an agenda) when you're editing contentious subjects. This edit to Taiwan, which changes "state" to "country", adds description about Simplified Chinese and a See also link, should not have been marked as minor. Thanks. wctaiwan (talk) 02:12, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Template:Forms of government, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Unfortunately, this is the second warning you have received about inappropriately marking your edits as minor, and looking at your contribution list, virtually all of your edits are marked as minor. In the future, inappropriately marking your edits as "minor" may be considered disruptive editing, and you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. –Prototime (talk · contribs) 03:49, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent contributions to Wikipedia. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent changes to Internet privacy, as minor only if they are truly minor edits. The above notifications list the rules surrounding minor edits, so please read them carefully before making further contributions. Unfortunately, this is your third warning for misusing minor edits, and your contribution list shows constant that this is a consistent issue. Further misuse may result in you being blocked for disruptive editing. Thank you. drewmunn (talk) 07:50, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Committee for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice (Gaza Strip), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Committee for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Medium of instruction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Human rights in China, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CPC and Government of China (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jaguar/Land Rover

I have reverted and/or modified a number of your edits to pages relating to Jaguar and Land Rover since both Jaguar and Land Rover are British car manufacturers, just like they always have been, and most probably always will be. The fact that the shares/stocks of both companies are currently owned by Tata of India doesn't change that, just like the fact that those shares/stocks were previously owned by Ford of the United States didn't change anything. Nor does the fact that FIAT of Italy own the shares/stocks of Chrysler make Chrysler less American, or the fact that General Motors of the US owns the shares/stocks of Holden make that company less Australian. The location of the headquarters of the Tata Group, that is the city and state in India where they can be found, has also been removed since it's totally irrelevant in an article about Jaguar, Land Rover or any of their vehicles. If someone wants to know that they should go to Poona in Maharashtra if they want to see Tata Group's HQ that information can be found in other articles. So don't make these changes again, as they could easily be seen as disruptive. Thomas.W (talk) 20:11, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Hello, I'm Biker Biker. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Suzuki, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Do not make claims to be largest/fastest/smallest/etc. without rock-solid supporting evidence. Biker Biker (talk) 12:19, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Suzuki. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The subject of the article is Suzuki of Japan, not their subsidiaries Maruti Suzuki of India and Pak Suzuki of Pakistan, so large infoboxes about those companies are totally irrelevant. Thomas.W (talk) 15:04, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Jaguar Land Rover. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. Thomas.W (talk) 15:27, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Suzuki, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your continued addition of unwelcome and unsourced content to Suzuki is now bordering on vandalism. I suggest that you take a step back from editing the article for a while. Biker Biker (talk) 15:59, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. I admire your enthusiasm for promoting the Indian auto industry, but that enthusiasm needs to be reined in a bit since it is becoming clearly disruptive. And other editors, me included, are growing tired of having to tidy up after you. So stop adding irrelevant links, both internal and external, to articles. Stop adding irrelevant text to articles, such as large chunks of info about Indian companies/subsidiaries in articles about other companies (such as overly long sections about Maruti Suzuki in the article about Suzuki Motor Corporation), stop trying to change the nationality of auto makers and stop making irrelevant comparisons or claims (such as claiming that Mercedes-Benz, Audi and Jaguar are competitors to Maruti Suzuki; a person who can afford a Mercedes-Benz in India would not even for a second consider buying a Maruti...). And so on. If you don't, you will be blocked from editing. Thomas.W (talk) 14:15, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Automotive industry in India (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Multinational and Fuso

List of entities associated with Tata Group (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Multinational and Conglomerate

Piaggio Aero (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Conglomerate

STAR India (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Liberation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Extrajudicial punishment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rendition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Foreign relations of North Korea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Namyang

Foreign relations of Pakistan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Waziri

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jemappelleungarcon for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Biker Biker (talk) 15:34, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jemappelleungarcon. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —DoRD (talk) 15:57, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Internet in the Palestinian territories listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Internet in the Palestinian territories. Since you had some involvement with the Internet in the Palestinian territories redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). TheChampionMan1234 05:27, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Internet in South Ossetia listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Internet in South Ossetia. Since you had some involvement with the Internet in South Ossetia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The ChampionMan 1234 06:16, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]