User talk:Jeffkov

So far all edits are for the preliminary posting and as I learn how to do this. Jeffkov (talk) 22:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:MichelineMaylorWiki.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MichelineMaylorWiki.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Micheline Maylor (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jcc was:

Structure needs tweaking- the lead is far too long and should be split off into different sections, e.g. "history".

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Micheline Maylor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

jcc (tea and biscuits) 18:55, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Jeffkov, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! jcc (tea and biscuits) 18:55, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Micheline Maylor has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Micheline Maylor. Thanks! LaMona (talk) 19:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Micheline Maylor (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

The referencing here is not adequate to support a pass under either WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG - it depends almost entirely on blogs, primary source profiles on the websites of directly-affiliated organizations, and other sources that cannot confer notability. None of the existing references constitute substantive coverage about her in reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Micheline Maylor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 21:52, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Micheline Maylor

I didn't say she's not notable; I said the sources present in the article weren't reliable sources that can support notability. Wikipedia's notability criteria depend entirely on the volume and quality and type of sources that can be provided to support the article — no criterion can ever be passed just by claiming that it's passed, or by referencing the claim to Blogspot or Tumblr blogs or primary sources.

Coverage in real media is the be-all and end-all of whether a person gets into Wikipedia or not — being named as a city's poet laureate would be sufficient notability if the quality of referencing were adequate to meet WP:GNG, but it's still not a claim of notability that would entitle her to have an article that's sourced as inadequately as this still is. While I see that you've recently added a couple of references (Metro and the Calgary Herald) of a stronger class than anything that was there before, all of the other references still have to go, and you haven't added enough better references yet to satisfy GNG.

It may be possible to get her over the bar — but as things stand right now, that will still require putting some more work into making the referencing a lot better than it is. Except for Metro and the Calgary Herald, every other reference in the article still has to be removed, and more pieces of media coverage about her still have to be added to replace them. Bearcat (talk) 17:40, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jeffkov. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jeffkov. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jeffkov. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Jeffkov. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Jodi Kovitz, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. •≈20+π^{(talk to me!)} 20:22, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jodi Kovitz (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sagotreespirit was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Remove PR language, since this should be a neutral-sounding encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is not PR: WP:PEACOCK, WP:IBA.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jodi Kovitz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jodi Kovitz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Sagotreespirit (^talk) 12:37, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jodi Kovitz (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sagotreespirit was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Good progress. Thank you for your declaration, although the writing style looks very strongly like PR writing instead of what a family member would likely write. This person should be notable, but additional advertising language needs to be removed. Replace "Jodi" with "Kovitz", because this should be an encyclopedia article, not a memoir or autobiography: MOS:SURNAME.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jodi Kovitz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jodi Kovitz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Sagotreespirit (^talk) 06:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jodi Kovitz has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jodi Kovitz. Thanks! — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 19:42, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanking

Please see Wikipedia:Thankspam—Anne Delong (talk) 03:05, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello Jeffkov. I read your message on the Draft:Jodi Kovitz page. While it's true that in the main encyclopedia people are discouraged from editing articles about subjects with which they are closely connected, this is okay for drafts that are submitted through WP:AFC, since the page will ultimately be moved to mainspace by a neutral editor.

What's holding the draft back and making editors hesitate to accept it is the fact that many of the references are not independent, and if no journalist, tech writer or other independent author has written about her role in an organization this may indicate that either the organization or her role in it are not newsworthy as yet, and maybe should not be in the article - it's not like a resume, listing everything a person has done. Also unlike a resume, instead of listing important-sounding titles, the article should say what Ms Kovic actually did in these organizations - organize a conference, plan a campaign, make a speech, write an article, etc. Although I'm sure that's not the case here, it's possible to have your name on a committee list for years and not actually do anything.

It's true that the draft is written without any glowing testaments - the language is okay. It's difficult, though, for a relative to be neutral about what information to put in the article; for example, detail about the subject's family members that hasn't been the subject of a news report or independently written feature article.

I am making an effort to find some better sources, but I don't have a lot of time right now, so I can't do it all at once.—Anne Delong (talk) 11:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jodi Kovitz has been accepted

Jodi Kovitz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—Anne Delong (talk) 13:12, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

High School

Hello Jeffkov - I'm PKT, and I have a question about a detail in the Jodi Kovitz article. You mention, "...Forest Lawn Collegiate High School in Toronto." Are you sure it wasn't Forest Hill Collegiate Institute ? I'm not aware of an area in Toronto known as Forest Lawn, and I live near the city. Please confirm, and thanks - PK T(alk) 15:34, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks PKT - seniors moment. Fixed it

Avec plaisir! ...... PK T(alk) 17:07, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please Unblock me. Thanks

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jeffkov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 185.153.179.40. My internet provider is shaw.ca - one of the major internet providers in Canada. I have been contributing and editing Wikipedia without issue for 7 years Can't seem to edit in Sandbox either. Thanks Jeffkov (talk) 13:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That IP address belongs to NordVPN and is a confirmed VPN. You'll need to disable NordVPN and wait a full 24 hours for the block to clear. Yamla (talk) 13:36, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fatima Zaidi (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fatima Zaidi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 04:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quill Inc. (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TipsyElephant were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the sources appear to be press releases, sponsored content, written by contributors rather than staff, published by sources that are not reliable, or contain only routine coverage of the company and events such as the company's award show. Some of the sources look half-decent, but the number of poor sources is currently drowning out the couple of okay ones (see WP:NOTEBOMB). Meeting notability requirements for a coorporation typically requires better sourcing than other types of articles (see WP:CORPDEPTH). Right now I'd also say the prose sounds promotional and does not have a neutral point of view. For instance, the article contains a lot of marketing lingo and unnecessary words like "corporate B2B (business-to-business) audio content", "providing full-service production expertise", "digital marketplace", and "podcast-specialized freelancers". The entire "services" section could be summed up in a few words like "Quill is a podcast production company". TipsyElephant (talk) 15:39, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quill Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TipsyElephant (talk) 15:39, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Weyant - Copyright

I see you have contributed a significant amount to the Anna Weyant article. Please note that it is against Wikipedia policy to copy and paste material from another source without proper attribution. You copied several sections of text from Harper's Bazaar, ARTnet, and Fad Magazine and did not attribute them as direct quotes - that is a copyright violation. Please rephrase or directly attribute all content from another source. This is a basic tenet of editing on Wikipedia. Thank you.

I've gone ahead and taken out all copyrighted material from that article and broadly restructured it to be in line with the Manual of Style. --19h00s (talk) 22:51, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. My mistake. Did not know that. Appreciate your help and will not do that again.

Jeff 174.0.15.17 (talk) 22:53, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just to follow up here - can I ask if you have a personal or professional relationship to Anna Weyant, her family, or Gagosian Gallery? This would include owning any financial stake in a work by the artist. I really hesitate to ask this so directly, as I don't like to be accusatory, but you seem to have contributed a significant amount to this article, including several personal details that would be difficult to publicly find. Again, I'm not trying to accuse or attack, but you seem pretty invested in specifically adding positive news and analysis about Weyant while removing what you view as negative. Additionally, via your talk page, I can see you have faced several issues in the past with conflicts of interest, so I want to be sure you weren't asked to update or edit this page by someone connected to Weyant. Thank you. 19h00s (talk) 17:51, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I have known Anna since she was about 8 years old - she was a daughter of some friends of mine. I have been following her career and am both astonished and delighted. As she has been making her way in the art world (which no one could have predicted) with the recognition and talent starting to grow and flourish, I have been following her career and have been keeping an eye on her wiki page and adding editing as things come up. I have not been asked to update or edit it by anyone. I care about Wikipedia likely just like you do and just keep an eye on this page. The art world is tempestuous and there are both advocates and assassins who (as you know) don't always have a pure heart when it comes to adding, editing or changing Wiki Pages. No conflict of interest (I was also a lawyer back at the dawn of time). Just a very surprised, but delighted observer. As a retired guy (age 74), I now have the gift of time to do these kinds of things. I was (also now retired) the Chair of the Banff Centre for Arts and Creativity, a world famous post secondary arts institution in Canada that scholarships and provided programs and self study for up and coming creatives of all sorts and have been involved in supporting creatives for decades https://www.banffcentre.ca/. Anna is one of many creatives I follow and help nourish. She is the only one I am currently doing that for on Wikipedia but I do lots of similar things and provide support (and donations) for literary, musical, and visual artists that I have met or know for several decades. See: https://www.flickr.com/photos/banffcentre/6050293736. IIn that picture was there hosting the then Premier of the Province of Alberta (like a Governor in the United States) etc to build support for creatives. I only mention this to credentialize myself as someone who CARES about creatives and creativity. Any followup clarification you need, please let me know. Jeffkov (talk) 18:13, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the reply, Jeff. I really appreciate the candor. Unfortunately, the personal relationship you have with the artist can be a conflict of interest. I completely understand what you're saying about other editors using this article to vent their own frustrations with the art world via critique of Weyant, but I'm not sure that is reason enough for you to contribute when you have personally known the subject of the article for nearly two decades. 19h00s (talk) 21:53, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. 19h00s (talk) 21:54, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Weyant

Hi @Jeffkov: I removed that Forbes 30 under 30 junk that you added the article. Its not a reliable source and put on the black list for that reason. An artist like that who is absolutely steller doesn't need approval from Forbes to show she is notable. The work is astounding already. Good work updating it. The WP:MOS decides what should go in and what shouldn't. Hope that helps. scope_creep^Talk 16:13, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. it's a bad day when you don't learn something new... 24.64.123.235 (talk) 18:44, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jeffkov. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I haven't edited anything in Wikipedia under any name other than jeffkov. In fact I am in Maui on vacation and haven't been doing anything online. Have been here since Jan 2 (and other than this annoyance have been having the bet possible time). Jeffkov (talk) 16:39, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=Greetings. I haven't edited anything in Wikipedia under any name other than jeffkov. In fact I am in Maui on vacation and haven't been doing anything online. Have been here since Jan 2 (and other than this annoyance have been having the bet possible time). Jeffkov (talk) 16:40, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=Greetings. I haven't edited anything in Wikipedia under any name other than jeffkov. In fact I am in Maui on vacation and haven't been doing anything online. Have been here since Jan 2 (and other than this annoyance have been having the bet possible time). Jeffkov (talk) 16:40, 22 January 2023 (UTC)}}[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Quill (company)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Quill (company), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. BangJan1999 18:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]