User talk:Jeffgolin

I wondered why the original author of this page, who was Kathryn Tucker herself, made so many factual misrepresentations. The most bothersome thing was that she reversed the order of the plaintiffs and the defendants in the cases she cited. For example, instead of citing Washington v. Glucksberg, the actual name of the case, she had it reversed, Glucksberg v. Washinton, which is wrong. I wondered why she did this. Certainly she must have realized it was wrong. I am new to editing Wikipedia and didn't understand how to do the linkages at first. Of course I figured it out finally, and realized that she did not really want the case to be linked because the Wikipedia page did not agree with her description of events, and if she cited the case correctly it would show up with the real page, Washington v. Glucksberg, and the reader would quickly realize the "misstatement", by reading the actual facts of the case. Apparently this was too inconvenient for her. This is pretty sneaky and dishonest in my opinion.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffgolin (talk • contribs) 04:49, 29 November 2008

Hemlock Society

I removed the proposed deletion template from Compassion & Choices and reverted it back to its original redirect to Hemlock Society. The proper place to write about the predecessor organizations to Compassion & Choices is in that article, in a section titled Predecessor Organizations or in two sections, one called Compassion in Dying and End-of-Life Choices. In that section, you can discuss the former organization known as Compassion in Dying, including its former name, Hemlock Society. If you have over a thousand words of encyclopedic content on the End-of-Life Choices organization, you should face no opposition in your proposal to split it off.

Once there is enough material there to warrant an article, you can open a proposal to split off this content to its own article. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 21:01, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Mary Warnock.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mary Warnock.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Warnock 110x106.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Warnock 110x106.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Washington v. Glucksberg

The previous edits correctly fixed the Washington v. Glucksberg label. Edits also linked appropriately to the Wash. v Glucksberg page. Both of those were left as is. However, I removed other significant edits that contained one-sided information/opinion that did not add to the factual data of this article. Specifically, a description of the Glucksberg case, which should be done at the Washington v. Glucksberg article. I also removed the Hemlock Society reference as the predecessor to Compassion and Choices. The appropriate place to write about a predecessor organization is in the article referencing the organization, in the "Predecessor Organizations" section. I also removed references to Lee v. Oregon, a case that Tucker never participated with.Carlaaxtman (talk) 18:12, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neon sign

I made a significant edition of this page, in some ways reflecting previous comments, which I tried to fix. The lack of citations is in some part due to the source as myself as a neon expert with personal hands on experience in a solo shop for 12 years after education in physics and an engineering career, so this is really a hands-on edit.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffgolin (talk • contribs) 22:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my discussion of your contributions at the Talk page for this article, and reply there. Cheers, Easchiff (talk) 17:47, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits about neon signmaking are now incorporated into a Wikibook. See the link at right. Cheers, Easchiff (talk) 01:25, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]