User talk:Jedmiller

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jedmiller (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. I currently use a VPN on my dedidicated server provided by OVH for privacy and security reasons and would very much appreciate it if the IP address for my dedidicated server (5.135.185.147) could be unblocked please. I was in the process of cleaning up an article based on my old secondary school when I discovered I was banned from editing. I also intend to contribute towards articles relating to English Law as I am a Law student and also articles relating to squatting and anarchism as I have a keen interest in these subjects. Jedmiller (talk) 06:31, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline: This request has already been handled via UTRS. Please check your email for our response. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:07, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

You are provisionally unblocked after apologising for your vandalism. Be aware that any further vandalism may get you immediately and indefinitely blocked again. Do not remove this message from your talk page.

Request handled by: Sandstein 20:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ringo Starr

Multiple editors have now reverted your edit to Ringo Starr. If you remain convinced that your edit should stand, please discuss it on Talk:Ringo Starr. The WP protocol is that once an edit is reverted, the edit should be discussed. That's called the "bold, revert, discuss cycle". — John Cardinal (talk) 17:32, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]