User talk:Jediyoda900

January 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ross Ulbricht, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Class455fan1 (talk) 14:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at User talk: Class455fan1, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Class455fan1 (talk) 15:17, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jediyoda900, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jediyoda900! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:24, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Ulbricht

Stop using references that don't actually support what you're writing. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 17:41, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not "trolling" there is a point to this...to get him an interview and a chance at freedom. -Yoda

January 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Ross Ulbricht. m.o.p 18:04, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Metallica Fan, I loved Enter Sandman. Still do. You can't really block people on Wiki... Yoda

Fortunately, blocking is very much possible, whether it's for 3 days or indefinitely.

Please don't treat Wikipedia as a platform to push an agenda on. If you continue doing so after your block expires, you will receive an indefinite block.

Listen to some Metallica instead, I promise it's a better use of your time. Best, m.o.p 18:51, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Look I am pushing an agenda. A very important one. I strongly, make that very strongly believe this person, Ross has been demonized by public opinion. if a high profile journalist can help him redeem himself, he might go free sooner. I am serious about this sir.

I applaud you for taking up arms for your cause, but Wikipedia is not a soapbox. This isn't anything personal, it's just that we are an educational project; we strive to be unbiased, and we do not report speculation, only reliable and verifiable facts. I fear your proposed addition goes against those tenets.

I suggest you look elsewhere - say, a forum of like-minded individuals - and I wish you luck. For now, once your block expires, please stick to constructive edits only (see our guide for beginners if you're interested), else you will be re-blocked. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Best, m.o.p 19:04, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Block evasion is definitely not the way to have gone. You have now been blocked indefinitely. m.o.p 19:09, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh its called 'block evasion' sounds technical. Do me a favor and at least watch a documentary called 'The Deep Web' its narrated by Keanu Reeves. Maybe it might change your heart:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3312868/