User talk:Jediknight15

This is my user talk page. I tend to make mistakes at times. If you need anything, I'm all ears.

UTRS appeal #55140

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #85736

@Drmies: What's your pleasure? Unblock? Restore TPA? Ask questions? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure? Hmm. A new record player? No, an induction stove. Well, did the editor have anything interesting to say, like an apology and a promise to do better? I leave it up to you, DFO. Drmies (talk) 16:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's very kind of you. FWIW, I'm using the deep fryer for amazing things. I have an old record player, on which I play old records, so that's fitting. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
restoring TPA -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Deepfriedokra, you won't regret this. Jediknight15 (talk) 01:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Jediknight15 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'd like to begin by apologizing to the Wikipedia community. I believe my actions were inexcusable and I made their lives a living hell. 2 Years ago, I unknowingly fuelled an edit war with @creecregofLife. At the time I didn't know what that was until I was blocked. We were both fighting over the Futurama article, the guy would later WP: Hound me. I didn't trust this guy as he wasn't an admin person. I should have used the talk page but I didn't cause I was pretty sceptical that anyone would reply to me there. The other user looks to be blocked for similar reasons. Anyways, I was blocked for 3 days by @Drmies who caught wind of this feud. I retaliated at him verbally by saying stuff I shouldn't have said, and at the time I was confused as why the other guy wasn't blocked too since he was edit warring too. He would later taunt me for being blocked on my own talk page, just see his warning template edit. I just lost my temper at that moment, I should have placed a lid on it. I got an infinite block and later had TPA revoked. I made an alt, that got blocked as well. Made a few failed I.P comebacks too, later gave up on Wikipedia all together. Now why am I doing this? I want to prove that I have changed and I am not as reckless as I once was 2 years ago. I was different person back then, even making embarrassing choices in real life. I took 2 years to reflect on my actions. My early edits quite stupid, I really didn't think them through. I'd describe some of them as good faith edits, as I wasn't trying to be disruptive. I can tell you that vandalising Wikipedia was never my intent, I know some users that treat this a Fandom Wiki or just write comical nonsense like "This show is stupid" or "My parents like this show" etc. I'm not one of those people, that's for sure. I'm deeply regretful for what I have done previously, I don't know if you guys can forgive me for all this. I have looked at users who are blocked, and I'm pretty sceptical that I will be unblocked, my chances are quite low. I put myself in this situation in the first place, what did I expect? If I am unblocked, then I am willing to accept your conditions, cooperate with others, have edits monitored and stick with one account from now own. I forget my password to the alt anyway. I'm just going to be the version of myself as possible. To say the least I have learned I few things from this ordeal like signing posts etc. If possible, I'd like a new lease on life and a fresh start this as I've been through a lot lately. I'm not trying to pretend it never happened, just a fresh start would be good. Surely everyone deserves a second chance? I hope you understand. Jediknight15 (talk) 00:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Sorry this has taken awhile, but I think you should get another chance here, so I will remove the block. 331dot (talk) 06:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I must say, this sounds pretty good to me; what do you think Deepfriedokra, Drmies? 331dot (talk) 09:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Drmies (talk) 19:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well? Accept or Decline?Jediknight15 (talk) 23:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deepfriedokra: some unfinished business here? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 05:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon and 331dot:. Please proceed as you think best. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:12, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OMG

OMG, thank you so much guys! I can't thank you all enough! I was starting to think that I was never gonna edit ever again @331dot, @Deepfriedokra. I won't let you guys down. This time I will be more cautious of my edits and habits. Today marks a brand new chapter in my Wikipedia journey. Jediknight15 (talk) 08:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, American Dad!, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello, I'm Primium. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Women in refrigerators, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please ensure sources are both secondary and indpenedent of the topic. Thank you! – Primium (talk) 18:37, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Television template

You're not alone, my friend. I also disagree with the new unfair guideline in the template. It's upsetting that I can't even watch my favorite animated series because of it. - FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:08, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was not aware there was new guidelines, I have read the rule they cited and I am convinced they just misinterpreted what they cited. Jediknight15 (talk) 12:05, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that explains everything. Now we must figure out how to convince the admins that they were wrong all along. - FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Paloni Show! Halloween Special!

Hello, Jediknight15. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Paloni Show! Halloween Special!, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Impossible Stream

Hello, Jediknight15. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Impossible Stream, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:09, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Impossible Stream (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has no references. Notability cannot be established without references.

Do not resubmit this draft without references. You can ask for advice about references at the Teahouse.

This draft is incomplete, and does not satisfy television notability.

This draft does not contain enough information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Impossible Stream and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:39, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jediknight15! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:39, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Paloni Show! Halloween Special! (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Paloni Show! Halloween Special! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:29, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]