User talk:Jeancosmico25

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Jeancosmico25, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! A8 UDI 15:20, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JGabriel ar. I noticed your post to Wikipedia talk:Village pump (assistance) but it's unlikely very many will; there are two reasons why this is not quite the right place. Most importantly, this is a talk page of a project, not the project page itself: note the word "talk" in the title. This means tat it is a discussion page for the project, where the project page itself is discussed. Second, if you look at the project page at Wikipedia:Village pump (assistance), you'll see that it is deprecated and redirects those arriving there to Wikipedia's help desk.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:27, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Help

Yo tampoco, asi que para que sufrir. Cerati es obviamente notable y por millas, asi que mientras esta "guerra" no se mueva al articulo, no hay realmente un problema. Es obvio tambien que los IPs no estan argumentando corectamente, ni utilizan un punto obvio, obvio no es Hendrix, pero si es notable. Traten de llegar a un consenso, asi, si cualquier usuario trata de removerlo ya existe una razón de que no se remueva. Si el problema persiste tómenlo a WP:3o. Tbh®tch^Talk ^© Happy Holidays 03:49, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bueno, entonces te responderé en español, es más fácil para mi (es un alivio en realidad ja ja). Son dos ip's 198.164.219.128 y 24.87.89.228, que, curiosamente, la primera desapareció y cuando esta no apareció más, inmediatamente apareció de la nada la segunda, sin duda sospecho que debe ser la misma persona. Te contaré algo de la historia de esto. Hace tiempo he estado intentando mejorar este articulo y el de sus compañeros de Soda Stereo. Creí que era bueno y objetivo incluir a Cerati en las páginas destinadas a nombrar a los usuarios notables de los instrumentos que él usa. En una de esas ocaciones apareció la 198 que simplemente se fue en picada contra Cerati, no solo sacandolo de la pagina, sino de otras más y también borrando la sección que hoy está en disputa. Incluí referecias, dialogué con él pero nada sirvió. Luego de hecho parece que siguió mis ediciones, porque se metió en otros artículos más para revertir mis ediciones. Ahora este problema como verás, ya pasó al articulo porque la seccion de notable instruments ya no está y cualquiera que intente ponerla denuevo, la (o las) ip's lo borran. Llegar a consenso es difici, por no decir imposible, si te fijas en la larga discusión, un usuario que defiende la inclusión de dicha sección, ha dado miles de razones, pero las ip's no las toman en cuenta y persisten en su afán, haciendo oidos sordos a lo que se les intenta explicar. Si entiendo bien, lo de tercera opinion lo interpreto como: que opine un usuario ajeno a la disputa y de su punto de vista, ¿cierto? ya han habido terceras opiniones (no de mucho aporte por cierto) y que en cualquier caso las ip no tomaron ni tomarán en cuenta. Este problema además se extiende a los ex compañeros de Cerati en Soda Stereo Zeta Bosio y Charly Alberti que tambien contaban con esa sección en el infobox y que les fue borrada por las ip's. Yo propondría que alguién importante como un administrador les diga lo que es correcto y si no obedecen, se les de un castigo. Además se podría semi-proteger los artículos para que sólo usuarios registrados lo puedan editar. Saludos y gracias por responder (y por responder en español). JGabriel ar (talk) 04:53, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Si el problema en realidad son IPs, puedes solicitar semi-protección en WP:RFPP, el conseso no es tan dificil de alcanzar, hasta donde vi, muchos usuarios creen que incluirlos esta bien. El problema es que no creo que sea el mismo ususario, ambos tienen una IP compartida, debido a sus ediciones. Pueden ser personas que se conocen (Uno es de Oregon y el otro es de Vancouver del Norte). Si una persona disruptiva te impide continuar con tu vida, lo mejor es revertir, pedir un bloqueo e ignorar, tambien ve no sabotees Wikipedia para ilustrar un punto. Tbh®tch^Talk ^© Happy Holidays 06:28, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yo si pienso que es el mismo. Primero: porque desde que apareció la segunda no ha aparecido la primera, que coincidencia ¿no?. Segundo, si una es de un lugar y otra es de otro no comprueba nada, puede que 198 haya viajado a Vancouver. Respecto al consenso, tu ya viste que la ip volvió a comentar, creo que eso dice todo. Lo de la semi-protección sería perfecto, pero no creo que lo semiprotejan, porque semiprotegen sólo artículos que estan en riesgo de excecivo vandalismo, y a pesar de que esto es molesto, es erroneo y todo eso, según las normas de wikipedia, no califica como tal, menos como excecivo, así que creo que lo rechazarían. Por lo mismo tampoco creo que bloqueen las ip's, la unica forma sería hacerles entrar en razón, pero eso como vez es complicado. Ahora te pregunto, ya que veo que eres experto en vandalismo: Si yo vuelvo a incluir esa sección cada vez que la ip la borre, ¿no tendré ningun problema? es decir, que la misma ip distorsione las cosas y diga que yo soy el vandalo ¿me podrian banear a mi?. Según yo, lo que yo haría sería simplemente una defensa del artículo, pero no se como lo ve el resto. JGabriel ar (talk) 01:56, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

¿Puedes buscar asistencia para solucionar el problema? Terceras opiniones o algo de wikipedia que permita resolver el conflicto. Te lo pido porque yo no me manejo tan bien en esta wikipedia. Francamente ya estoy cansado de la eterna discusión, para algo que encuentro injusto. Pero por lo mismo, no me quiero rendir, voy a seguir defendiendo lo correcto. JGabriel ar (talk) 04:09, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Listo, pedi por comentarios Tbh®tch^Talk ^© Happy Holidays 04:23, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Realmente no tan raro que solo IPs lo editen, ahora enlaza aqui, y el último IP que comentó viene de Australia, dudo que hizo un viaje de 20 horas solo para ello. Recuerda que los editores IP son humanos y también ellos pueded editar y comentar. Y bueno la única diferencia entre administradores/usuarios registrados e IPs es solo que los primeros tienen mas permisos que los segundos. Si quieres un admin, puedes pedirle su opinion personal, aunque te podría decir lo mismo que yo, o ya se ha dicho antes. Tbh®tch^Talk ^© Happy Holidays 04:39, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Queen II. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Friginator (talk) 17:07, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Queen II

You can add the information if it is notable like you said. But using the word "legendary" is inappropriate. Also, the info was written in the wrong place. If you want to add the info back, you should probably put it at the end of the section entitled "Legacy". Cheers. Friginator (talk) 16:55, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Soda Stereo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Queen and Squeeze (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Soda Stereo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page My Bloody Valentine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:24, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Soda Stereo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sampler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dynamo (Soda Stereo album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tambura (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:10, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bocanada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sampler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Hallelujah (Leonard Cohen song) does not have an edit summary. Thank you.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! -- DonIago (talk) 16:19, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Latin music invitation

You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.

Erick (talk) 18:35, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gustavo Cerati, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sampler. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JGabriel ar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JGabriel ar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]