User talk:Jdlddw

Welcome!

Hello, Jdlddw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction

5 The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help

Tips

How to write a great article

Manual of Style

Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help

{{helpme}}

I assume you added the helpme as an augmentation to your unblock request. Unfortunately, those who monitor the helpme requests often are not administrators. An administrator will review your unblock request in time. However, I would suggest that you review the Username policy, as sharing accounts is not allowed: "For reasons of attribution and accountability, you are not allowed to share your account or password with others. If you do, and this becomes known, your account will be blocked." Thanks, Ariel♥Gold 00:56, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sharing Accounts

I currently don't share an account anymore. My little brother used to use it without my permission. But I'm changing my password. --Jdlddw (talk) 01:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Jdlddw[reply]

You stated: Three users use my computer and Wikipedia account. The person who has been accused of vandalism will not use the account. That still leaves two users. IrishGuy ^talk 01:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The other user hasn't used the account for months. --Jdlddw (talk) 01:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Jdlddw[reply]

If there were three, one was a vandal who won't be using this account anymore and the other two haven't used it in months...that leaves none. IrishGuy ^talk 01:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And this account has only been around since September 11, 2007. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 01:40, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The last time she used the account was in late September. The vandal can't use it anymore because i'm changing my password.--Jdlddw (talk) 17:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Jdlddw[reply]

User:LessHeard VanU

What is your problem? Why did you block me without a warning? I believe Administrative Abuse is prohibited. I don't even know you. Go get some mental help.And no this isn't a personal attack.--Jdlddw (talk) 17:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You do realize that you blanked the block a few hours ago, and you were given sufficent notice that your edits were in violation, which you also blanked. Your edit histories are detailed out here for your convenience and the convenience of others. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 17:56, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know what I did was wrong but he has no right to do that because I reverted back the edits immediately.--Jdlddw (talk) 18:01, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Jdlddw[reply]

Self-reverting vandalism is still considered disruptive, and certainly serves no useful purpose. We already have a special place for you to play with Wikipedia, in any event. Someguy1221 (talk) 00:57, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is the Sandbox?--Jdlddw (talk) 01:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Jdlddw[reply]

Click on the link in the reply to find out. It's a test bed for users, essentially. And please stop canvassing (cross-posting) to numerous talk pages, WP:ANI, WP:ANB, etc. for comments and consensus-building per WP:CANVASS.

If you really want to find out why you were blocked originally, then you should probably stop deleting comments on your talk page. They are archived, if you are not aware, in your talk page history for your browsing. You were given a sufficient reason, which you ignored and requested an unblock, then later deleted all of that in haste. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 01:09, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know they were archived.It was just in the heat of the moment.--Jdlddw (talk) 01:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Jdlddw[reply]

Hey...

Edits like this are rarely appropriate... — Scientizzle 23:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And trolling like this will get you blocked again. — Scientizzle 23:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OOOOOOOKKKKKKKKKK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!--Jdlddw (talk) 23:57, 3 January 2008 (UTC)Jdlddw[reply]

Well...you were given plenty of warning. And crap like this is unacceptable. Please go find something else to do. — Scientizzle 00:57, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.--Hu12 (talk) 00:04, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of FasChek Supermarkets

I have nominated FasChek Supermarkets, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FasChek Supermarkets. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 00:12, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Kanawha Mall

A tag has been placed on Kanawha Mall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JD554 (talk) 15:09, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Charleston Town Center

A tag has been placed on Charleston Town Center requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JD554 (talk) 15:13, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Charleston Town Center, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from "http://www.charlestontowncenter.com/". As a copyright violation, Charleston Town Center appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Charleston Town Center has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Charleston Town Center and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Charleston Town Center with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Charleston Town Center.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. SWik78 (talk) 15:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Charleston Town Center

There is a case for including the article on Wikipedia, but you might want to read the link in your welcome message about writing a great article. You also need to be carful with the facts, as the Charleston Town Center was opened in 1983. youngamerican (wtf?) 15:46, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article came across as advertising, had factual errors, and-frankly-wasn't very well-written. If you would like, I can move the deleted bits to an area where you can work on them before reposting the article. Cheers. youngamerican (wtf?) 21:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:CCC.jpg

Hello, Jdlddw. Concerning your contribution, Image:CCC.jpg, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. As a copyright violation, Image:CCC.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:CCC.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:CCC.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:CCC.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:CCC.jpg]].

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 01:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unsourced information to articles

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Charleston Civic Center, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Thank you. --Farix (Talk) 17:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA Coaching

Greetings, I just noticed that you had a request for Admin Coaching on the Admin Coaching Page. I have removed the request because you are not ready to become an admin. Please see the general guidelines for what most people are looking for in an admin here or my guidelines. If you don't know what your edit history looks like, please check out Kate's Tool. I encourage you to come back to the coaching page when you get closer to being qualified for adminship.Balloonman (talk) 05:43, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Kanawha County Schools, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stonewall Jackson High School and Charleston High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cross Lanes, West Virginia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Asian and Native American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mallory Airport

The article Mallory Airport has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Private airport with no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 18:21, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mallory Airport for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mallory Airport is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mallory Airport until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

AusLondonder (talk) 11:09, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]