User talk:Jdavi333/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 7

File:2017 Pro Bowl logo.jpg

I am giving you a heads up. You incorrectly claimed that you owned the rights to File:2017 Pro Bowl logo.jpg, when in fact it is a non-free logo from the NFL. I have changed it accordingly. Elisfkc (talk) 04:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

116th US Congress

It's not gonna do any harm, to show that the Speakership & the PPT offices exist. GoodDay (talk) 16:26, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Super Bowl LI halftime show. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 17:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Super Bowl LI halftime show, you may be blocked from editing. It does not matter what other articles have listed, you either add a source else do not add such content. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 17:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

@User:IndianBio: Dude, chill. instead of going ape on me, maybe sober up and read last year's halftime show article. If that sat there for over a year and nobody had an issue with it, maybe you should figure it out before you go all cray cray. Jdavi333 (talk) 17:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Nobody's going ape on you, but since you have been around in Wikipedia for over 2 years now, adding original research to any article without a reliable source is not allowed, and you should be well aware of the fact. I don't give a damn what is present in another article, by all means remove it if it is not supported by the succeeding source. But if you add in the above linked article one more time without a valid reference, I will report you to WP:ANI. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 17:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Valid redirects

When your block expires, instead of applying speedy tags yet again to Zal Bin Hasaan, Kings of the Highway and Lady Ambrosia, if you still think they should be deleted, make a request at RfD. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:54, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

But you can't just block me without any warning. I was doing something that I feel is fully valid based on WP:G7. You must have a valid discussion rather than abusing your administrator privileges. Read WP:BLOCK and WP:ADMINABUSE. Jdavi333 (talk) 22:59, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

@User:RHaworth further, all of the other similar speedy deletions I requested last week were fulfilled, so I'm not sure why you feel that these three pages are different. If it makes you feel better, I'll just take 3 days off. See if I give a damn. Jdavi333 (talk) 23:06, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Blocked????

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jdavi333 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been requesting a perfectly reasonable speedy deletion for pages that I created (see WP:G7). Then I was blocked by User:RHaworth without any warning or anything, in violation of the normal standard procedure for blocking. An explanation might help.

Decline reason:

You requested speedy deletion; it was turned down. To edit war to restore the deletion request is inappropriate; you might have right to nominate articles under WP:G7, but you don't have a right to insist on it -- you have no particular personal right for that redirect to not exist. Once that nomination was rejected, the proper step would have been to take it to WP:RFD to discuss the issue. Edit warring is never appropriate. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 23:47, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

While reviewing this request at the same time, I also note that you have again mis-used rollback in a dispute despite a very clear warning in December. I have disabled that feature for this account. Kuru (talk) 23:51, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

@User:Kuru: I had noticed that warning earlier. I often accidentally click the rollback button instead of the undo button. Most of my usages of rollback (I think) were in proper cases of vandalism. If you could restore me I would appreciate it. I will try to be better in the future. Jdavi333 (talk) 00:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

• I propose the block be removed as soon as you promise to raise the matter at WP:RfD instead of edit warring. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:18, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

I hadn't realized there was another appropriate venue for these requests because you issued me no warning!!! Jdavi333 (talk) 00:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Actually, you've been warned several times about edit warring in the past; you apparently heeded those warnings, but perhaps you just ignored them? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 04:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, like you did at 2017–18 United States network television schedule. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. AdamDeanHall (talk) 19:01, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Rocky cast list

Considering it was a result of your complaints on Rocky that prompted this discussion, please join the discussion and weigh in with your opinions here:

• Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film#Presentation_of_cast_lists_in_articles

--Cinemaniac⁸⁶_{Dane_Cook_Hater_Extraordinaire} 01:58, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

@Cinemaniac86: Thanks for the heads up. Jdavi333 (talk) 16:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Super Bowl 46

Had no problem with your revert, because when I did make it a redirect, it was blank with just a stub tag. EF 23:14, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Hello. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Template:2017 AFC North standings. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 20:08, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

@ Jd22292I appreciate your concern, but in accordance with previous years' templates, and the fact that is used to express winning percentages virtually across all Wikipedia Sports related pages, I have taken the liberty to change the templates for this years' NFL season to be in compliance with the many previous years' templates. Jdavi333 (talk) 14:05, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

NHL Arenas

Shouldn't T-Mobile Arena also be at the top because it's opening this season for NHL Usage with a new expansion team? -NetWitz- 18:52, 5 September 2017 (UTC)NetWitz

From other similar pages in other sports leagues, only the actual newest stadium/arena is listed. Older stadiums that happen to be beginning their use for this league this year don't really count. Jdavi333 (talk) 18:54, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Even if its opening with a new expansion team? -NetWitz- 18:58, 5 September 2017 (UTC)NetWitz

Hello, Jdavi333. You have new messages at Talk:List of National Hockey League arenas#Newest Arena.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Template:2017 NFC standings

Perhaps someone ought to correct the {{2017 NFC North standings}} template then. – PeeJay 21:31, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

@PeeJay- If it is indeed incorrect then of course it should be corrected. I simply do not have the time to be watching the templates for all 8 divisions. Jdavi333 (talk) 23:26, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Backup requested at Template:2017 AFC standings

Hey. There's an IP edit warring their preferred ranking on the template, and I need help removing their disruption (I'm getting close to 3RR trying to do so). Please also see their Talk page as well. Their last edit is here. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 18:47, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

@Jd22292 I started the conversation on the talk page and warned the anonymous editor. I we have to, we'll request a block and page protection. Jdavi333 (talk) 19:20, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

I've sent a report to ANEW. They don't appear to be understanding. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 19:26, 3 December 2017 (UTC)