User talk:Jd.101

Winnipeg Article

Please review this post once again. You are continuing to behave in the same manner and are downgrading the Winnipeg article.

While I appreciate the improvements you've made to Winnipeg, I must again ask you to please explain what you're doing. You have shown a persistent unwillingness to explain your edits, despite being asked to repeatedly, and a tendency to edit war. You add material[1] and then immediately remove it [2]. You remove material without explanation [3][4][5]. You have continued to change the location of this picture (e.g., [6]) when the consensus on the article's talk page is to put it on the right. And all of these diffs are just from this evening; the same problem is repeated almost nightly. The habit of making a dozen edits in a row, with no edit summaries, makes it almost impossible to follow what you're doing.

You do not own the article, and you must take other editors' consideration into account, or else it is disruptive editing. This is the last time I'll ask before asking for administrator intervention. justinfr (talk/contribs) 01:13, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Please ensure that you enhance the article, not diminish it. --142.161.161.211 (talk) 11:20, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:August 15 2007 downtown 175.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:August 15 2007 downtown 175.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:06, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

September 2007

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Winnipeg. Thank you. -- Taroaldo 01:40, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the edit summary when editing articles. None of your recent edits have included an edit summary. This makes it difficult for other editors to quickly see what kinds of changes have been made. Thank you. --- Taroaldo 03:16, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Winnipeg. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Taroaldo 04:25, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1134237736_05e0f04f6f.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:1134237736_05e0f04f6f.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 15:35, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1244251419_2d24b03c56.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:1244251419_2d24b03c56.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:25, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1315782916_6156c922b3.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:1315782916_6156c922b3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Winnipeg

Hello, thanks for your edits to Winnipeg. When you're making changes, please be sure to include an edit summary so that other editors can quickly see what edits you've made. justinfr (talk) 19:57, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. In the editing window, there's a box that looks like this:

Please include an informative edit summary in this box when you're making changes to articles, such as you did to Winnipeg. I reverted this edit because it removed content without explaining why. Please don't do that. justinfr (talk) 02:27, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

Hello, just a note about your edits to Winnipeg. When you see that your edits have been reverted, please go to the talk page to discuss them instead of getting into a edit war. I've created a section for discussion there. See WP:BRD. Also, please do not remove large blocks of content without explanation, as you did with this edit. justinfr (talk/contribs) 11:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Winnipeg, again

While I appreciate the improvements you've made to Winnipeg, I must again ask you to please explain what you're doing. You have shown a persistent unwillingness to explain your edits, despite being asked to repeatedly, and a tendency to edit war. You add material[1] and then immediately remove it [2]. You remove material without explanation [3][4][5]. You have continued to change the location of this picture (e.g., [6]) when the consensus on the article's talk page is to put it on the right. And all of these diffs are just from this evening; the same problem is repeated almost nightly. The habit of making a dozen edits in a row, with no edit summaries, makes it almost impossible to follow what you're doing.

You do not own the article, and you must take other editors' consideration into account, or else it is disruptive editing. This is the last time I'll ask before asking for administrator intervention. justinfr (talk/contribs) 01:13, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jd.101. You have new messages at Justinfr's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Image:Ca-mb-br.gif

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Ca-mb-br.gif has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[7][8]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Pegasus «C¦T» 01:44, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Br-mb-crest.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Br-mb-crest.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, History of Winnipeg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from url:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winnipeg. As a copyright violation, History of Winnipeg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. History of Winnipeg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:History of Winnipeg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:History of Winnipeg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:History of Winnipeg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. HalfShadow 01:10, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

USDA plant hardiness zone for Minneapolis

You edited Minneapolis to say that Minneapolis has a USDA plant hardiness zone of 5. Are you sure about that? All of the garden centers around here say that we're in zone 4, and I checked a 1990 USDA plant hardiness zone map and it says that Minneapolis is in zone 4.

Could you recheck on this? Thanks. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 02:38, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I see you are keeping them on their toes.
If a fellow winnipeger can lend a hand let me know.
Though I expect to be online less, I'll check back.
GabrielVelasquez (talk) 04:10, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Humidex and wind chill units

Neither humidex nor wind chill is is a measure of temperature, and neither is expressed in degrees Celsius. It is incorrect to apply those units and convert them to Fahrenheit degrees. —Michael Z. 2009-02-16 17:19 z

Humidex and wind chill units

Neither humidex nor wind chill is is a measure of temperature, and neither is expressed in degrees Celsius. It is incorrect to apply those units and convert them to Fahrenheit degrees. —Michael Z. 2009-02-16 18:10 z

Recent edits to Edmonton

I love some of the pictures you have added to the article the only problem is i am trying to get the article up to FA status, so there cant be left-aligned image under a sub heading (===) See MOS:IMAGES your welcome to help edit it i just would like if you could follow the image rule. Thanks Cheers Kyle1278 01:03, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Winnipeg, Manitoba Exchange District.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Winnipeg, Manitoba Exchange District.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:10, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Whitehorse Yukon Canada Sept 22 2008.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Whitehorse Yukon Canada Sept 22 2008.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:12, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Whitehorse Yukon Panorama Sept 2008.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Whitehorse Yukon Panorama Sept 2008.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:12, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Whitehorse Yukon Panorama Sept 2008 second version.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Whitehorse Yukon Panorama Sept 2008 second version.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:43, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Onanole Manitoba July 25 2009 second version.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Onanole Manitoba July 25 2009 second version.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:49, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Onanole Manitoba July 25 2009.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Onanole Manitoba July 25 2009.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:26, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:SteepRockCliffs second version.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:SteepRockCliffs second version.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Winnipeg from Above second version.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Winnipeg from Above second version.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:DSC05760 Stitch second version.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:DSC05760 Stitch second version.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Winnipeg Pic

Hi Jd.101, I saw you cropped the pic I uploaded to the Winnipeg article. If you're looking for a strictly downtown shot, I have a better one: http://i.imgur.com/GSJj1cb.jpg

Let me know if you want to use it and I'll upload the full resolution image. Haljackey (talk) 19:42, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture is here http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Downtown_Winnipeg_from_above.jpg Haljackey (talk) 15:46, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:August 15 2007 downtown 002.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:29, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jd.101. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]