User talk:Jcook1400
| This user is a student editor in University_of_Central_Arkansas/Advanced_Evolution_(Spring_2019) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Jcook1400, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Elysia and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:58, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]Separate your sections and make them each more obvious as to what that section is about. Make sure you have some way to show the lead is different than the following sections. There are minor grammatical errors but there are sentences that need to be rearranged so that they are grammatically correct. I like how you explained what each of the terms mean but you could probably do that in one section rather than creating an entire paragraph for each of the terms. I like all of the information is supportive of the leading section and it does flow well. The article is very informative and I like how clearly it is written. Other than a few minor changes, it is a very good article. Jroberson4 (talk) 20:15, 28 March 2019 (UTC) Jroberson4
Peer Review
[edit]Hey John! Your article is very informative. You also do a great job when if comes to defining things. I would definitely make your sections more prominent. Within each section it would be nice if your paragraphs flowed together rather than each paragraph solely being about one individual topic. Jordan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmoore31 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Peer review - Grant
[edit]The overall structure of your article was very well done. I found the article easy to navigate and the flow for the most part was good. I identified a few instances in the article where you start the sentences with words like "therefore", "however", and "for example". Try to limit the use of these and rephrase the sentence to function without them, they cause an unnecessary pause with the comma being at the beginning of the sentence and disrupts the overall flow of the article. The information was provided well with examples linked to your topic which greatly helps the understanding of the subject. You may need to adjust your structure when explaining the various sexual dimorphisms of flowering plants by linking them more directly to a specific section. In this same section provide more of a definition for each dimorphism discussed, it will help the overall understanding of each one. Overall I enjoyed your article and found it very informative on flowering plants. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Advevol (talk • contribs) 02:03, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Peer review review
[edit]Hi John! You've got a lot of great information here. Your reviewers did an excellent job with their comments, so I would go ahead and address those. One minor issue I have is the organization. You have lots of sections, but I think you need some overarching themes to organize them. Related to that is that you seem to be focusing on traits that result from sexual selection (which is great!), but you don't have a section talking about the mechanisms of sexual selection in plants. I think that is built in to some of your sub-sections, but it might be worth pulling it out into its own section. Consider dividing you article into two main sections 1. Mechanisms of sexual selection (with subsections for male-male competition and female choice - common mechanisms in animals), and 2. How sexual selection affects plant phenotypes. See if that makes sense to you, or if some other organization framework works better. You also mention the question of how sexual selection could act in hermaphroditic plants, and that might be worth expanding on a bit. Finally, just go ahead and fix the formatting of your references, etc. I think after some revision that this article will be a great addition to Wikipedia! Advevol (talk) 03:17, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Peer Review Comments
[edit]First, I would like to thank everyone for their constructive suggestions. I first went back and try to fix the flow of my paper. I had several comments about choppy sentences, and unnecessary wording, so I tried to fix those. I also went back and fixed the formatting of the sections and the references. Another thing I changed was the formatting of the sexual dimorphism section. I also added a section on mechanisms, which I think will help tie everything together better. I talk about mechanisms some in the sections, but I believe the new section will make everything flow a little better.
A page you started (Sexual selection in flowering plants) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Sexual selection in flowering plants.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thank you for your informative new article on Sexual selection in flowering plants.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.