User talk:Jcoleman001

Can I talk to an admin

You used the {{Help me}} template, but asked a question that can only be answered by an admin. If you still need help, please add the {{Admin help}} template instead. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access.

October 2016

Hello, I'm Justin15w. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hampton, Virginia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Justin15w (talk) 17:35, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks Justin you did the right thing

Hi Jcoleman001 (talk) 18:32, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey favonian I don't know if you can see this but if you can I need to talk with you. Why does my page says sock puppet but I never had an account if your referring to the IP address the it is Hampton city schools which is shared wifi it's an school account. I'm not viBODY . And why am I blocked and the evidence is nothing but my page being edited by me. And why did you delete my page Jcoleman001 (talk) 18:59, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Favonian you can email me at jaekwoncoleman5@gmail.com Jcoleman001 (talk) 19:00, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Favonian

Can I talk Jcoleman001 (talk) 19:24, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jcoleman001 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not viBODY there's a school account but why was I blocked for somthing that was believed to be me with no evidence can you help me Jcoleman001 (talk) 19:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wow, so there are two people named Jaekwon Coleman in your school? Pretty unbelievable. Vanjagenije (talk) 08:10, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Jcoleman001 (talk) 19:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wow Jcoleman001 (talk) 20:50, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is google me and the other one one name is jkwon Coleman my name is jaekwon Coleman Jcoleman001 (talk) 20:51, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Favonian

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jcoleman001 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm innocent why did you block me over somthing another user did and you accused me of being another user with joined accounts. Why I didn't do anything to you. And I'm using the school wifi so of course there will be other accounts. I'm just saying me and viBODY are two diffrent people. And my contribution doesn't have any evidence that I'm viBODY so why did you put that there. And why did you delete my whole page and replace it with your words. Now I have to do it all over again. I need to talk with you. Because I'm serious right now Jcoleman001 (talk) 19:40, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is crystal clear Confirmed socking. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:00, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Oh yeah and I'm not an sock puppet either Jcoleman001 (talk) 19:42, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why Jcoleman001 (talk) 22:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Favonian

It also states that Blocks should not be punitive See also: Wikipedia:Sanctions against editors are not punishment Policy shortcuts: WP:BLOCKNOTPUNITIVE WP:NOPUNISH Blocks should not be used:

in retaliation against users; to disparage other users; as punishment against users; or where there is no current conduct issue of concern. Blocks should be preventative Policy shortcuts: WP:BLOCKPREVENTATIVE WP:BLOCKDETERRENT Blocks should be used to:

prevent imminent or continuing damage and disruption to Wikipedia; deter the continuation of present, disruptive behavior; and encourage a more productive, congenial editing style within community norms. Deterrence is based upon the likelihood of repetition. For example, though it might have been justifiable to block an editor a short time ago, such a block may no longer be justifiable right now, particularly if the actions have since ceased or the conduct issues have been resolved. Jcoleman001 (talk) 21:39, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I understand. I respect that favonian that you are doing your job. I'll let you do your job. Have a great day 🙂. Jcoleman001 (talk) 02:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Jcoleman001 19:33, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Delete

I don't want my account anymore I'm done so I'm deleting my account. Jcoleman001 19:35, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Accounts can't be deleted, but that's no problem: if you don't wish to use your account then just abandon it. Probably quite soon everyone will have forgotten it. Also, user talk pages are not deleted except under quite special and exceptional circumstances. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:46, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You still have access to this talk page while blocked in order to allow you to make unblock requests, not in order for you to play around. If you continue to misuse talk page access it will be withdrawn. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You chose not to follow JamesBWatson's advise, so you talk page access has been revoked. Favonian (talk) 18:03, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jcoleman001 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17766 was submitted on Mar 13, 2017 22:19:19. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:19, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]