User talk:Jchiacchiaro

Image copyright problem with Image:LifeGarageNoPeople.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:LifeGarageNoPeople.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:21, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:GarageTek Beauty Shot sm.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:GarageTek Beauty Shot sm.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GarageTek

A tag has been placed on GarageTek, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of GarageTek and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kai A. Simon (talk) 18:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: APL Photonics has been accepted

APL Photonics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Randykitty (talk) 15:42, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AIP Publishing (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Too many Primary Sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AIP Publishing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 22:21, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jchiacchiaro! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 22:21, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:AIP Publishing has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:AIP Publishing. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:00, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:AIP Publishing has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:AIP Publishing. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've added other sources to supplement the record. Should I remove the references from the organization's website? scienceisreal (talk) 14:17, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may as well, they will be ignored in any review as they do not contribute to any notability. Theroadislong (talk) 14:21, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:AIP Publishing has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:AIP Publishing. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:13, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AIP Publishing (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AIP Publishing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:49, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:AIP Publishing has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:AIP Publishing. Thanks! StarryGrandma (talk) 00:18, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. AIP Publishing works independently from AIP. It publishes for organizations that are not necessarily affiliated with AIP. Perhaps if I add a section of what organizations we publish for that would differentiate us enough to warrant our own page. I will submit a new draft with that information.

Again, Thank you. scienceisreal (talk) 18:32, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:AIP Publishing

Hello, Jchiacchiaro. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:AIP Publishing, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:AIP Publishing

Hello, Jchiacchiaro. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "AIP Publishing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:25, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]