User talk:Jb-hamburg

Deleting airline stub

IIRC the article you were talking about was little more than a rephrasing of the title without sources (wikipedia is not a web directory. Yes we welcome new information to be added, but we do need to make sure that information has some value, is likely to be of broader interest and is properly sourced (see WP:NOR, WP:RS etc.) If you have some more substantive information on the airline please feel free to recreate it. --pgk 17:53, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify I said substantive, not substantial. Even a most basic stub needs enough information to get people going on expanding it, and some indication of the significance or otherwise. For most areas we have notability guidlines (see WP:CORP for corporations, which I guess is where airlines would fall). Also see WP:NOT we aren't just here to collect information anymore than you'd expect an encyclopedia to be. It's difficult to tell from the basic description which of the information you have would make for reasonable articles it may be none of it, it may be all of it. As I say that particular article was little more than a restatement of the title so didn't give much to build upon. You might like to start a discussion on the village pump as you may get some useful input into the best way to use the information you have. --pgk 19:18, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Air Dawson

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Air Dawson, by Russavia (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Air Dawson seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Air Dawson, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:53, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Papillon Airways.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Papillon Airways.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:29, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ALAK (airline) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ALAK (airline) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ALAK (airline) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --FoxyOrange (talk) 13:34, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Papillon Airways

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Papillon Airways, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:30, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]