User talk:Jaz421
Welcome
[edit]Hello, Jaz421, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! — Masum Ibn Musa Conversation 11:39, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
Nomination of M. Khalil Bahri for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. Khalil Bahri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Brian O'Conner 21:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
April 2022
[edit]
Hello Jaz421. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jaz421. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jaz421|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. CUPIDICAE💕 17:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hi CUPIDICAE, many thanks for your message. Well, Absolutely NOT! I am not being paid for any of my edits. Since, I am a new Editor, I am continuously improving my Skills whilst not only making minor edits, but improving the random Articles with some quality works just like to be a Professional Editor. And surely i abide by the rules of Wikipedia. I believe in the materials used in Wikipedia with reliable Sources/Links. However, i will surely need your assistance which might show any such type behavior. Regards, Jaz421 (talk) 19:34, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- Let's revisit this. Want to disclose now or would you like arbcom to do it for you? PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:11, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- I already explained you above. I don't understand why you want to impose something on me that is totally irrelated. Jaz421 (talk) 17:48, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Let's revisit this. Want to disclose now or would you like arbcom to do it for you? PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:11, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Marcia Smith
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Marcia Smith, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 15:27, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
June 2022
[edit]
Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:
- Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
- State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
- Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
Request regarding Unblock
[edit]{{unblock|reason=My Account has been blocked without any good reasons. Please unblock my Account to let me contribute to Wikipedia. I have neither took any payment from anyone nor i am willing to.~~~~}} Jaz421 (talk) 14:21, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Request regarding Edit my Article
[edit]Hi admin, please help me to remove the logo from the Draft:HGC Apparel. It is not my own work. I want to get it removed as i cannot edit page due to edit restrictions. Thanks Jaz421 (talk) 19:10, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- It doesn't meet the threshold for originality anyway, so it's irrelevant. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:12, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of HGC Apparel for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HGC Apparel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.