User talk:Jasper0070

Welcome!

Hello, Jasper0070, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 06:36, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Pasig River into River valley civilization. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:17, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:41, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TROLLER

The hell? Was that suppose to be a joke? Better get your info straight before you troll yourself! Every info I put in is legit and if you didnt spend so much time on wikipedia maybe you'd find that every info was true if you actually went outside of wikipedia and looked it up on other sources! At least I don't copy my info!

Hey! dont forget to sign your statement before you left SOCKPUPPET and throw away your IP' vandalism is a not-welcomed acts here !(Jasper0070 (talk) 06:46, 26 July 2017 (UTC))[reply]

WHY?!

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Jasper0070 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

180.191.79.196 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

autoblock reason=Please unblock me due to the following reasons: i must add a valid sources for the articles and statements in an article i add since source is needed. and some IP vandals are doing nothing but vandalizing articles how can i possibly work if i am being Handcuffed?

Blocking administrator: Bbb23 (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You are not autoblocked. You are blocked directly, and have not addressed the reason for your block. Yamla (talk) 11:42, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Let me Guess its Lyndonbaines friend admin did this Ok , Let me remind you of this guy trolling with his IP minions

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jasper0070 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me due to the following reasons:@ User:Yamla first I really have no idea why i m blocked suddenly i just being unable to put a source (that was strange and sort of "Something Odd") , im just reverted vandalized articles in philippine pages because of an IP editors doing Disruptive editing second i must add a valid sources for the articles and statements in an article i add since source is needed. and some IP vandals are doing nothing but vandalizing philippine-related articles how can i possibly work if i am being Handcuffed? (Jasper0070 (talk) 02:36, 29 July 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for being a WP:Sockpuppet of User:JournalmanManila. Please, explain that in your next unblock request. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:22, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please don't remove declined unblock requests while you're still blocked. —Wasell^(T) 15:14, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]