User talk:Jasmine Primrose
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Jasmine Primrose! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Hebrides (talk) 22:46, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
The Rural Enterprise Academy
[edit]Hi Jasmine Primrose, thank you for creating the article "The Rural Enterprise Academy". Nicely balanced and well formatted. I made a few small edits to it, adding a couple of extra sources and two categories, as well as linking terms like GCSE and KS4 for the benefit of worldwide readership. I also linked to it from the South Staffordshire College article. I know that finding your work has been edited by someone else seems strange at first, but you'll soon find that collaborative authoring and working together is one of the strengths of Wikipedia! Best wishes — Hebrides (talk) 22:46, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
The Rural Enterprise Academy moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, The Rural Enterprise Academy does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Please see the school article guidelines which describes how the content of school articles should be organized, with the aim of providing general guidance to editors. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Steven (Editor) (talk) 06:15, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Working on The Rural Enterprise Academy article
[edit]Hi Jasmine Primrose, I've made some changes to The Rural Enterprise Academy article to satisfy the points Steven raised about independent references. I've also tried to include more about its uniqueness and notabilitiy. I hope you don't mind that I have moved the references into the References section and arranged them in alphabetical order of name – I find this makes page maintenance much easier. I have submitted the article for reinstatement into Wikipedia. Cheers — Hebrides (talk) 20:04, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of The Deenway Montessori School for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Deenway Montessori School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Deenway Montessori School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. // Timothy :: talk 02:11, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Caversham Preparatory School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable primary school.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 13:31, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 10
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited International School of Georgia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Georgian and Georgia. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for links
[edit]
|
Building the web award |
| Thank you for your work to WP:Build the web between articles. I appreciate your efforts to make it easy for people to find the articles and information they're seeking. Thank you! WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC) |
Aries (musician) moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Aries (musician), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 01:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
The Rural Enterprise Academy
[edit]Hi Jasmine Primrose – the article you created, The Rural Enterprise Academy, has at last been accepted and published online. Thank you for all the work you did in getting this article started last December, and I'm sure you will agree that the article is informative, attractive and is a valuable addition to Wikipedia. Several editors have worked on it, and I think this illustrates the advantages of collaborative authoring. I hope you're pleased with the way the article has developed. — Hebrides (talk) 14:33, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Aries (musician)
[edit]
Hello, Jasmine Primrose. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aries (musician), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The article St Maria Goretti's RC Primary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Primary schools are not generally notable unless demonstrating a feature befitting this, usually its building(s) being listed structures. This has not been demonstrated here and I doubt it can be. The content of some interest can be incorporated into the existing Cranhill article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crowsus (talk) 22:17, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of St Maria Goretti's RC Primary for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Maria Goretti's RC Primary until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Star Mississippi 18:24, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Lilly Wiedemann moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Lilly Wiedemann, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 21:10, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Lilly Wiedemann
[edit] Hello, Jasmine Primrose. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lilly Wiedemann, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Lilly Wiedemann
[edit]
Hello, Jasmine Primrose. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lilly Wiedemann".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:41, 1 May 2024 (UTC)