User talk:JaneVannin

British people

Further to your edit on the above article, there have been at least three edit sumaries referring to the talk page - which is explanation of why the edits were being removed - for now. It is about consensus and discussion of any changes made to the infobox images on the articles talk page where there has been considerable debate about who should and who should not be included over many months. It is also about style, as the way it is now formatted looks with respect, a mess. I have already suggested that the infobox images should contain someone such as Samuel Coleridge-Taylor would be a good idea. Rather than simpy reverting please discuss it on the talk page where I have already suggested STC could be added and one other user has suggested that maybe Naomi Campbell be added. Thank you. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 18:07, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With regard to your message on the above talk page no offence taken, you are right my message is relevant to there. The good thing about all of this is that the ip users edits perhaps this will (at last) mean a Black Briton is included in the infobox which I believe should be there. Thanks and have fun. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 20:19, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Optimizing relief

Hi Jane, I've moved the above page to Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Optimizing relief, making it a subpage of the Graphics Lab. As it is a tutorial, it really shouldn't be in mainspace. Thank you for the hard work, and please keep it up! Best wishes, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 20:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, I was going to contact someone at Graphic Lab to find out where you wanted it! JaneVannin (talk) 12:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

Glad to see that you translated this tutorial by your own as we, at the French-speaking Graphic Lab, were looking for translators. Good job! I just made some very little corrections.

If you want you can find more tutorials here, a page that works like a mini-portal with tightly linked tutorials I wrote. There are three main tutorials (for three different types of maps), three complementary (the one you translated is part of these), plus an additional page for specific geo-referenced data sources. Note that I still have to finish the redaction of two of them (in fact, to re-write them completely) so those links are still red.

Greetings. Sting-fr (talk) 13:50, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sting Will try to get round to the other tutorials - as a long article it was quite a lot of work, so I'm going to try to do some shorter ones next! But I think that the tutorials look like useful resources so will try to do them as a priority. JaneVannin (talk) 12:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jane.

Si effectivement j'ai bien fait une carte de l'Écosse je n'ai pas encore touché au Limousin.

Excellente nouvelle si tu as décidé de continuer à traduire les autres didacticiels, cela fait qu'il faudra que je me dépêche de terminer les deux qui manquent (mais je vais être absent la semaine prochaine).

Bon courage et merci pour ton travail ! Sting-fr (talk) 21:10, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Confusion

Hi Jane,

I believe the problem might stem from the proofreading section being inside html comments in the example template. Any text between  doesn't get processed. Here is an example, just paste it into the template after the sample (changing the info to your relevant situation, of course)...

|Proofreader-s = Vrac|
|Proofreading_progress = 100|

Re: Help with image request?

Hi JaneVannin!

Sure I'd be glad to help. I'm not too hot with image licencing myself either, but I'd be more than willing to get a shot of Kelly Holmes into the mix here (I'd love something like (http://www.britsattheirbest.com/images/ss_holmes_400w.jpg this], with the flag!). If you'd like to e-mail me with your conversation (go to my talk page and on the left hand side console - under the Wikipedia globe - you should see the "E-mail this user" function), I'd be happy to add my voice. I have secured images from Flickr in the past that would've otherwise been unacceptable by way of outlining that Wikipedia is the 6th most visited website on the net, that the photographer will be credited as the author, and that no profeit will be made by anyone at WP. --Jza84 | Talk 11:16, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jane !

Salut à toi et un énorme MERCI à toi pour ton projet de traduction d'un tutorial cartographique de Sting ! En espérant que cela montre l'exemple. C'est peu probable -il faut avoir un très bon francais, anglais, et etre intéressé par les cartes-, mais tu peux peut-être trouver un ou deux assistant parmi les autres wikigraphistes du Graphic Lab.

Bon, toujours est-il : tout plein de merci à toi ! Yug (talk) 21:24, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:50, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Collage and book link

Thanks for that input. Some users feel the need to take everything too personal and it helps to have another opinion. He/She has put the link in now and it looks OK. Setwisohi (talk) 18:28, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Resources/Maps

Hello. Please see Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Resources/Maps. I reorganized it, and added sections that could list any map-related pages you create and/or translate. --Timeshifter (talk) 21:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Too kind

Thanks for your comments; methinks you are too kind! Anyway, I have added a comment on the UKIP talk page. Don't know if you're deeply interested in UKIP or not, but if so have you seem Richard Corbett MEP's booklet on them? It's called "25 Things You Didn't Know When You Voted For UKIP" and contains very well-sourced details. Emeraude (talk) 15:50, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I've just read the thing from Richard Corbett. Very interesting. Quite a lot in there which should be made public knowledge. UKIP are far too close to the likes of the BNP for me. And, anyway, I like being a European! JaneVannin (talk) 20:16, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar. Thank you very much. Emeraude (talk) 00:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Artologik TIME

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Artologik TIME, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable software product. First 60 ghits all appear to be download options.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CultureDrone (talk) 11:35, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Well basically, Wikipedia is not intended as a list of all software programs that have been created (nor all musical groups, episodes of television shows etc. - despite some appearances to the contrary !) Wikipedia requires articles to prove some sort of notability about the subject - the main guidelines on notability can be found by clicking here, so you therefore need to indicate why this particular piece of software is notable and, unfortunately, I wasn't able to find anything out about the product which indicated to me that this was the case, which is why I flagged it for potential deletion. Even more unfortunately, unlike some other subjects, there isn't (currently) a specific page anywhere that I can point you at which gives you a list of 'things which make software notable' (though it has been attempted in the past). If it's the first to use some new whizzy technology, or has been widely covered in the news, or is the market leader in its field, then it's got a good chance of being notable (but not a certainty).

You also need to be able to prove any assertations you make (verifiability) - details can be found by clicking here - so if you;re going to say the product is the market leader, you need to be able to provide references (not directly connected with the product itself) which can prove this.

Finally, the fact that there are articles about similar things is an argument often put forwards, but is irrelevant for notability considerations - you can ready why by clicking here.

I hope this has helped - feel free to drop me a message if you want to discuss anything :-) CultureDrone (talk) 15:14, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Artologik TIME

I have nominated Artologik TIME, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artologik TIME. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. CultureDrone (talk) 11:11, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it makes a change not to be screamed at for nominating someone's article for deletion :-) I honestly have no problem with an article existing about the product if it can meet Wikipedia's notability criteria. I agree totally that much of the other software doesn't seem to meet notability criteria either - and I'll probably be looking at them in the near future - that's the problem with 2.75 million articles and only so many editors ! :-) CultureDrone (talk) 16:16, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I Need some help translating some Old French

I need help translating these letters from Old French into English. They were written by General Pulaski to General George Washington during the Revolution.

Thank you.

Trenton le 27 Fevr. 1778. Sir Je renvois La Letre du General Wayne qui m’a honoré de Son Ordre pour Le joindre a Mount Holly je L’ais repondû que çela ne se pouvoit pas vû que la Cavalery restente avec moi forme un peti nombre pour Les Services et quentout je ne trouverais pas plus de 18 Homs de quels jais envoie Les melieurs sur Le chemins de Philadelphie pour assurè les passages du Transport des Beuvs qui marche pour LArmè Je suis biein aise Mon General de Vous demender Si etant le General Brigadie plus Jeune que les autres je suis Soumis à leurs ordres particuliers çet eclaircicement m’est necessaire je sais que dans L’autres Services celui qui Comende La Cavalerie nest Soumi qu’a Chef de L’Armé. Ainsi entrant aux Services j’ais crû de Vous Seul de prendr Si ce autrement il m’import que je Sois instrui. Je suis avec Respect de Votre Excelence le tres humble et tres obessent Serviteur C. Pulaski Gn. of Cav. La Partie aupre Germenton que V. Ex. mordoner de rélevé devoit etre remplaçe par les Milicieins de cette Province Le Gouverneur m’a amusé jusque au dernieur moment apresent il doit encor tenire la Conseille pour doné la dernieure resolucion ainsi le retard ne vieint de moi et Sil faudra cette releve de notre Cavalerie elle lassemblira tres fort vu que l’Enemi a pris deja un Mesure et conoissant tous Les environs et notre faible trouvera toujour le Moyeins de se deffaire de Nou Cavaliers ce qu’il decourage boucoup Le Notre et enhardi l’Enemi jauserais representer a V. E. qu’il serait mieux de faire retirer notre Cordon jusque a une distance et tenire differentes partie de La Milice Sur les differentes Routs quelles se post.. en ariere anveroient plus pret de La Ligne de Lenemis ses patrouils, onpourra meme faire quon aj à chaque partie 3 ou 5 Milicieins à cheval ce nest pas difficil pa.. il y a peu de Milicieins quils n’.. Leurs chevaux, et chaqun aime mieux Montér à Cheval que Marche a pied, j attends toujours les ordres de V. E.

Berlington [N.J.] le 28 Fevrie à Minuit 1778 Sir Jais l’honeur de Vous rapporter qu aiant rassemble toute La Cavalerie du Regiment Blan et de detachement que jais eu avec moi jais trouvè 44 Cavalie 5 bas Officiers pour les Services et quoique ils ne sont 698 pas dans le melieur etat jais marchè avec eux vers L’Enemi mais come le chemin est insuport.. je suis force de Passe la Nui a burlington de demain je Comte de reconoitre L’Enemi et jagirais de Consequence. je verrais le General Wayne et je concetrais avec lui je ne negligerais rieins que le biein du Service exigera mais pour etre sou Ses ordres je ne m’attends pas, je servirais neenmoins à mon prejudice à linteres Publique. Aprè quois je tacherais Mon General de diminuer Vos embaras sur mon Comte me demetant de ma charge dont Le Congres ma honoré par Votre recomendacion. J’envoiais d’ici deux batots armes sur Ancokes krik pour observé par la Riviere L’approche de LEnemi qui se trouvait a deux Heures apre midi sur quatres differents Batiments à L’endroit quon apele Sene Merize. Je repets à V. Excelence la plus grande Necessité de Soigne les besoins de La Cavalerie Elle manque dé tout j’aurais desire de faire aumoins bieins equipé Le Regiment de Blan avec les Lenceurs mais come cela mest deffendû il faut quon prene d’autres Mesures sans s’abandone trop sur les Colonels quis certainement seront hors d’Etat de remplire Leurs Objet, ce nest pas pour moi que je parle, je ne Comte davoire Lhoneur d’etre a la tete de cet Corps la Campagne Prochaine, mais Come je Serais toujours ami de L’interes des Ameriqueins, je suis forçe de dire ma façon de Pensè plus si apre Moi Le Comendement sera doné au Colonel Moilen, toute la Cavalerie sera en meme Etat que Son Regiment, Le Colonel Blan est un Activs Officier il Lui Convieidra cette charge, et Monsieur Moilen pourra etre contenté d’une autre chose je dis ce que je crois etre necessaire et jais Lhoneur d’etre avec respect de Votre Excelence Les tres humbl et tres obeissent Serviteur Casimir Pulaski —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rochlafayette (talk • contribs) 23:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Sorry for the delay, but I haven't been very active on Wiki recently due to pressure of work. See your talk page JaneVannin (talk) 13:46, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tutoriels de Topo-Cartographie

Salut Jane, Je viens de repasser sur User:JaneVannin/translations, il me semble que le travail a beaucoup avancé ! (depuis l'année dernière :] ) C'est Great!! Pourrais tu me tenir au courant sur la 'complétude' de chaque page. Par exemple, dans User:JaneVannin/translations, pourrais tu rajouter un poucentage type :

<small>(fr↔en: 80%)</small>
(fr↔en: 80%)

derrière chaque titre de page. Si la majorité sont à 80 ou 100%, je vais commencer a faire de la publicité pour cette page de tutoriels ! A+, et merci beaucoup pour ton travail de traduction !!! Yug (talk) 15:13, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Topographical map tutorial

Hi Jane. Good work on translating the map tutorials.

I've been trying to create a topographical map, so I've been using your translated guide, along with the original French version.

I decided before I do my map to do the Falkland Islands so I could follow the tutorial to the letter; however, I keep getting stuck at step 47:

Export the bitmap map: go into File -> Export raster map -> PNG. In the exportation module window, click on the button in the field Raster file to be converted: and select your map. In the field Name for new PNG file, replace <rasterfilename> with < View_topo_GRASS > then click Run. Your image will be stored by default in the root folder of the program: C:\GRASS. Keep the module open.

My Output - GIS.m never finishes "converting DEM_Falklands_UTM@PERMANENT..."

I've tried restarting the project, and I've even reinstalled GRASS, but it gets stuck at this point. The software doesn't freeze, it just never completes it, not even after leaving the computer alone for two hours.

Is this a necessary step or can it be bypassed? Matthewedwards : Chat 01:29, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Hi JaneVannin!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 17:05, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi JaneVannin! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 04:28, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!

WikiWomen - We need you!

Hi JaneVannin! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more!

Get involved by:

Visiting our website for resources, events, and more
Meet other women and share your story in our profile space
Participate at and "like" our Facebook group
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel
Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering
Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience!

Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:14, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for opinion

Hi JaneVannin: Sorry to trouble you, but I could not help but notice your expression of affection for TOS on the Wikipedians who like Star Trek: The Original Series page, and so I would be curious of your thoughts on the notability of a Star Trek author for whom I just created a Wikipedia article -- which may be promptly destined for the trash pile. As a newcomer here at Wikipedia, my first article attempt was indeed recommended for deletion within hours of its creation by a senior user named JzG who seems to me to be overly hostile and dismissive of Star Trek, calling it fancruft (= trivial, obscure, of importance to just a tiny group of fanatics) . Since you are a Trek fan, if it is also your good faith opinion that my subject is in no way deserving of an article on this site; and you could let me know, I would feel much more comfortable with the justice of the pending deletion action. My proposed article may be seen here, assuming you visit the page soon enough ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Gurian Kind Regards. Tosresearcher (talk) 05:50, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JaneVannin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of time travel works of fiction, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 18:29, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JaneVannin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, JaneVannin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]