User talk:Jamshed001

November 2018

Hello, I'm LynxTufts. An edit that you recently made to Ahsan Azhar Hayat Khan seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! LynxTufts (talk) 20:49, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LynxTufts was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is the correct way to submit a new page for review, but this page will not be accepted because of the guidelines for notability. Also, you should not create pages about yourself.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jamshed001/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Jamshed001/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LynxTufts (talk) 17:43, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lieutenant General Sadiq Ali

The article Lieutenant General Sadiq Ali has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CataracticPlanets (talk) 07:26, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Climate change WikiProject proposal

I've changed your proposal quite a bit to make it more neutral. I added as one of the aims of the project to help each other communicate neutrally about the science of climate change. With mass media communicating about this in a polarized fashion, sometimes being way more alarmist than the science warrants, it is important that we find terminology that does climate change just without exaggerating or framing it.

I think, and I might be wrong, that you are quite passionate about combating climate change. To be fair, I'm as well. I'm thinking about writing an essay about how to contribute neutrally to Wikipedia for editors that do feel passionate about this. Passion can cloud judgement a bit, but if people are aware of their biases, they might actually become better editors than people who are completely blind to biases in public communication.

The essay would contain a discussion of some common public communication. For instance, that the Guardian is a high-quality but biased source, whereas NASA is more neutral. Would you be interested in an essay like that? Femke Nijsse (talk) 13:35, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sameh Muhtadi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sameh Muhtadi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 07:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sameh Muhtadi

Hello, Jamshed001. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sameh Muhtadi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sameh Muhtadi

Hello, Jamshed001. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sameh Muhtadi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]