User talk:Jamison Lofthouse/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Jamison Lofthouse. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
CVU Academy
See Enroll page. Dan653 (talk) 22:45, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Urgent
Applying a speedy tag to one of your pages has cascaded into dozens of others - look at CAT:CSD. Find out which page you actually want deleted and put <noinclude></noinclude> around the speedy tag. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:16, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- I forgot that a page that I wanted deleted had subpages and Twinkle was just being smart and tagged them all for deletion. Anyways all those pages were deleted when I went to fix the problem. JamisonGuestbookUserboxes 09:21, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
May 2012
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to user talk:Jim1138 has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. If this was reverting vandalism, please be more careful who you blame for it. In particular, don't restore the vandalism you claim you're fixing. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:15, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- I checked the history for User:Jim1138 and I have not changed it. I have posted warnings on his talk page via WP:STiki. Please explain this. JamisonGuestbookUserboxes 10:26, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- What did I do that was problematic. I have two warnings on the page. JamisonGuestbookUserboxes 10:49, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- They were inappropriate warnings. Jim removed the vandalism, but you restored it again and warned them as if they were the vandal. Please be more careful with the tools you're using - and I would suggest removing the warnings, with an apology. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:10, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- What did I do that was problematic. I have two warnings on the page. JamisonGuestbookUserboxes 10:49, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Take care with tools
This edit to Republic of Manitobah is a bit worrying. Initially I thought that you had just been beaten to the reversion of the actual instance of silly vandalism and therefore accidentally reverted the wrong version; however your edit was 6 hours later, making this a bit unlikely. Please take care when using automated/semi-automated tools such as STiki as many automatically warn editors about vandalism. I suggest that you self-revert the warning that was placed at User talk:Isarra. --Mrmatiko (talk) 14:26, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- Alright, I fixed everything. But maybe you can help me. I am very new to STiki. I am enrolling into the CVU Academy to learn how to use it but I am still waiting for an answer. While I am waiting I wanted to try it and I went for a few test rounds and you are the third complaint that I have received. In STiki I saw a vandalism edit and I clicked vandalism (undo) button and their was no message, no conformation, no info at all. So I got very confused. Then I find out that I was bringing back the vandalism not removing it but in STiki it looked like it was removing it. Let me explain why I thought it was removing it. First STiki showed me what the page looked like before. Then it showed me what the editor vandalized. It then asked me if I wanted to undo this and I let it. Please get me out of this. JamisonGuestbookUserboxes 15:06, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- I don't use anti-vandalism related semi-automated tools and I personally dislike STiki in particular because it seems to turn anti-vandalism work in to a numbers based competition. I guess that the best place to get help is The talk page of STiki. --Mrmatiko (talk) 15:21, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- Mrmatiko doesnt Stiki leaderboard clearly say in block that this is not a competition ? --ÐℬigXЯaɣ 06:13, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- OK. I think I'll wait until I have training in semi-automated tools. Until then I'll fix all my mistakes and revert vandalism with Twinkle. At least with Twinkle I have full control over everything. Thanks. JamisonGuestbookUserboxes 15:33, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- I don't use anti-vandalism related semi-automated tools and I personally dislike STiki in particular because it seems to turn anti-vandalism work in to a numbers based competition. I guess that the best place to get help is The talk page of STiki. --Mrmatiko (talk) 15:21, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
You did the same thing to me at Prayer wheel. Just thought I'd let you know. Calvin 1998 (t·c) 16:00, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- The STiki diff display is the exact same as the Wikipedia standard diff display in regard to which side is which - the old version is on the left, the new version is on the right. If you hit "vandalism", it'll revert the page from the new version to the old version, and (possibly) template-warn the user who made the change(s) that took the page from the old version to the new version. Allens (talk | contribs) 05:45, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- Please consider joining the Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy its strongly recommended to do so to get proper guidance --ÐℬigXЯaɣ 06:15, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- Also please note that --ÐℬigXЯaɣ 06:28, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Warning: You take full responsibility for any action you perform using Antivandal Tools. You must read and understand Wikipedia policies and use this tool within these policies, or risk being blocked from editing. |
I apologize everbody. I am joining the CVU Academy but I'm still waiting to enroll. Right now I am self blocking myself from editing till I have recieved proper training. I apologize. JamisonGuestbookUserboxes 11:32, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thats good, I see that CVU/A have accepted you, very soon you will get an instructor, who will help you out. Also feel free to contact me on my talk, whenever you need an advice, regards--ÐℬigXЯaɣ 14:55, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Signature
Is it possible that you could make your signature less confusing? E.g., can you consider removing the text shadow, and changing the code so that Jami and son don't link to two different places?--yutsi Talk/ Contributions 18:00, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- Is this good? JamisonTalkGuestbookUserboxes 09:43, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, that's much better. Thanks!—Yutsi Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 16:01, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
- Although, you need to make it
Talk
instead ofTalk
, as the talk page link is currently dead right now. :)—Yutsi Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 16:04, 30 May 2012 (UTC)- I thought that too but you're on my talk page so the link is dead. I bet on your talk page your signature link would be dead also. Go here and scroll to the near bottom and look for Penyulap's signature. His name is broken because you are on his userpage, the page that the link would link to if you weren't already on the page. Also go here and you'll see that the link is not dead. JamisonTalkGuestbookUserboxes 17:18, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
- Ah. I learn something new every day!—Yutsi Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 17:31, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
- I thought that too but you're on my talk page so the link is dead. I bet on your talk page your signature link would be dead also. Go here and scroll to the near bottom and look for Penyulap's signature. His name is broken because you are on his userpage, the page that the link would link to if you weren't already on the page. Also go here and you'll see that the link is not dead. JamisonTalkGuestbookUserboxes 17:18, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
- Although, you need to make it
- Yes, that's much better. Thanks!—Yutsi Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 16:01, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
CVUA Talkback
Hello, Jamison Lofthouse! Your question has been answered at the CVU Questions page. Feel free to leave a reply there! Message added by benzband (talk) 18:40, 29 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{CVU Talkback}} template. |