User talk:Jamie Eilat

Amphibia (TV series)

@Jamie Eilat I had already removed the actor names in the episode summaries of this show before, but there has a lot of edits that have been WP:FAN violations, and people just continue to make the list a mess. Actor names are already listed in the list of characters page, so they don't need to be on the episode summaries all of time. Please fix the issues on the episode list and report users who are doing WP:FAN violations. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 17:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war at List of The Owl House characters

I've blocked the IP range. Please note for the future that reverting a page more than three times in 24 hours can get your account blocked, regardless of who started it. -- Scott Burley (talk) 19:41, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for telling me. I'll make sure to keep it in mind. This is the first time I've encountered a situation like this, so I'll be making sure to better verse myself in Wikipedia's policies regarding these sorts of situations. Jamie Eilat (talk) 20:03, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Exception to WP:EXISTING

Hi, regarding your reverts on Template:The Owl House. WP:EXISTING specifically calls out the exception that direct redirects to specific sub topics are permitted in templates and references {{MSPA}} as an example that uses them in the exact same way I have added them to the owl house template.

Please refrain from further reverting them, per the above policy. Raladic (talk) 21:59, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Raladic I am aware of the exemption raised in WP:EXISTING. However, WP:NAVNOREDIRECT & WP:EXISTING specifically note this exemption being for specific distinct sub-topic, and the example given in WP:EXISTING is specifically noted as being "for the sake of completeness". I would argue that distinctness and completeness are not very applicable to the situation of Template:The Owl House, so that the exception should not apply. If, for example, it were the case that multiple, but not all, main and supporting characters already had their own pages, then it would be reasonable, for completeness, to include redirects for the remaining main/supporting characters for the navbox. But this is not the case. Instead, the show's protagonist (Luz) is the only character with their own page, with all other primary & secondary characters falling under the "list of characters" article.

It is also worth noting that your proposed formatting is in contrast to the precedent of all other American television series navboxes (including American animated series navboxes), which, with near total consistency, only include links for individual character pages and "list of characters" pages without any added redirect links. – Jamie Eilat (talk) 00:10, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The example of Template:MSPA is exactly like here. It lists a series of comics, some of which have a main page, some do not and are redirects then to the specific sub-topic within the list article. That is why this general exception exists and is regularly cited.

It is also not quite correct that there are no other animated series nav boxes follow the same general exception, I just randomly pulled one from the list and immediately came across Template:Generator Rex which links to a redirect for some of the characters for completeness of the template and I’m sure there are many more if you went through them. Raladic (talk) 05:58, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that WP:NAVNOREDIRECT is concerned about something different, it is about if a certain page does have a main page article, that then the link to it from a navigational template should’ve directly to that page, not via a redirect, which results in that page then showing in black when that specific page is active instead of as a link.

That doesn’t apply here, as the correct policy here is that redirects to sub topics (in this case characters in a series) are permissible per the general exception of WP:EXISTING so that a navigational template is more complete and provides navigational value. Raladic (talk) 06:26, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As a reference where another user similarly erred and removed a redirect and was subsequently re-reverted by another user referencing the exception of WP:EXISTING - diff, it even recently happened on the MSPA navbox itself - diff. Raladic (talk) 06:57, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jamie Eilat,

You sometimes have an edit summary but I'd like to encourage you to include one with every edit, especially when you are reverting very experienced editors. You can even set your Preferences to remind you to leave an edit summary (which is what I do). Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz Thank you for the notice. I'll be sure to take it into further account — Jamie Eilat (talk) 01:03, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Scott Pilgrim Takes Off trailer logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Scott Pilgrim Takes Off trailer logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstars for your efforts

		The Citation Barnstar
		Awarded for you work on List of rulers in Wales. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 18:26, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Epic Barnstar
		Awarded for you work on List of rulers in Wales. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 18:26, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A suggestion about any future "Lonnie Kris Wellington" related vandalism.

Hi. Today I saw that an anonymous user AGAIN added this name and linked Kris to it, I know you reverted that quickly but I believe that while quite extreme it is best to both revert (and delete the revision from the archive, if you can do that) and ask an admin to block the user/IP for vandalism.

This is quite extreme, I am aware and I am perfectly fine with you not accepting it as a proper way to handle any such future cases of vandalism, however I am fairly certain that the person who added these again is the same one who added them before, and is therefore still stalking that Lonnie Kris Wellington person, which is indeed quite messed up and that's part of why I am suggesting such an extreme measure.

As the one who genuinely regrets ever making that redirect (not knowing it was a real person's name) and thus bringing this person's attention to it, I think its best to prevent any such incident from ever occurring again, especially given this is the real name of a private person who has no reason to be mentioned on Wikipedia and is only being mentioned and added because of their ex.

I hope you understood my suggestion, cheers. SignedInteger (talk) 22:54, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Characters of Undertale and Deltarune

Hello! Noticed you just did a few copy edits here. Not a biggie, but one edit was to change These skeleton brothers are known for their outlandish human-capturing schemes and function as comic relief within Undertale. into the text starting: A pair of skeleton brothers known for their outlandish human-capturing schemes, and who function . . . . Your change makes the sentence a non-sentence (without verb). It could be changed to "This pair of skeleton brothers is known for their outlandish human-capturing schemes, and they function as comic relief within Undertale." I didn't want to change it again, in case of offense; though I had just changed it, today, because previously it was a non-sentence. Do you want to change it? Sorry for the bother. Be well. — Yogabear2020 (N.B. NoviceEditor; Talk) 01:06, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amity Blight s2e13.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Amity Blight s2e13.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 01:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Amazing Digital Circus as Adult Animation?

Hello, why is The Amazing Digital Circus considered an adult series if it isn't? CroakyReserva (talk) 22:54, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The creator of the show, Gooseworx, has gone on record to state that the show's target demographic is "people in their 20s" and that "[t]his show isn't going to be very suitable for young kids"; additionally, there are news outlets have either directly labeled the series as adult, such as The Mary Sue, or have referenced it as appealing to an adult audience, such as CartoonBrew. I probably will though add a citation or two for the use of "adult" in the article lead, since if seems like it ought to have one. – Jamie Eilat (talk) 23:24, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, as I am Brazilian, the IMDb website says it would be for ages 10 and up, that is, TV-PG, this does not mean it is an adult series, and it gives me a bit of a headache to watch, I am 14 years old and I watch this series and it is a good series, it can be recommended only for teenagers from 13 years old, or it can be for ages 13 and up, on the Glitch website it says the audience is 13 to 24 years old. CroakyReserva (talk) 01:24, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The definition for adult animation presented on Wikipedia itself is "any type of animated motion work that is catered specifically to adult interests and is mainly targeted and marketed towards adults and adolescents" (emphasis added). The age range presented on the website does not thus serve to preclude the labeling of the series as "adult animation".

The matter of whether the series can be labeled as "adult animation" rests in whether there are reliable sources/citation that label it as adult animation, not in personal or subjective assessment; and, as I have already pointed out, there are reliable sources for the "adult animation" label. — Jamie Eilat (talk) 21:40, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But I don't want it to be that way when I'm reading about the series because it's not "adult animation." CroakyReserva (talk) 22:39, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

reply! CroakyReserva (talk) 22:58, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Simply not wanting something to be the case does not make it so; if the sources describe the series as being "adult animation", then it is. "I just don't like it" is not a valid argument. — Jamie Eilat (talk) 23:17, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How can I understand this properly and accept it? CroakyReserva (talk) 23:26, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why this from The Amazing Digital Circus series???

why can't I make the series The Amazing Digital Circus not be considered adult, and why does it have to be that way, since there are no adult things, and only censored swear words??? CroakyReserva (talk) 18:59, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hello

To what do I owe this series of cancellations? Have I created a problem?

F. M F Gervais (talk) 13:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To explain:

Firstly, many of the images were included on pages that already had family trees or genealogies on them (created using either the Tree list or Tree chart templates), which makes the presence of the family tree image redundant. Secondly, the presence of personal website & social media links goes against Wikipeida’s policy regarding watermarks in images (see WP:WATERMARK) Jamie Eilat (talk) 14:42, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discussion at Talk:2024 United States presidential election#Remove RealClearPolitics from polling.

Hi Jamie Eilat. I have noticed that you have made edits to polling aggregates, and I would like to bring this discussion to your attention. If you have any thoughts about this, regardless of your stance, I encourage to make a comment. CountyCountry (talk) 17:55, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wihtwara

thanks for your recent edits fixing up that article - i presume you saw the youtube video, which is how i found out about it :) ... sawyer * he/they * talk 15:11, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Caeneus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brill. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]