User talk:JamieTheGenius

JamieTheGenius, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi JamieTheGenius! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! AmaryllisGardener (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:22, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Ryan Driller

A tag has been placed on Ryan Driller requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 17:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Improper removal of speedy deletion template

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Also not that while a mere claim of significance can justify declining an A7, it is generally not sufficient to decline the speedy nomination of an article previously deleted by an AFD consensus, as Ryan Driller was. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 21:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Justin Long (pornographic actor)

The article Justin Long (pornographic actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. By established consensus, the Urban X awards fail the "well-known/significant" standard. No nontrivial biographical content. No independent reliable sourcing

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 13:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The fuck are you doing seriously ″The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo)″? He's member of Urban X Awards' Hall of Fame. PORNOBIO clearly says that if the actor is a member of any awards' Hall of Fame, then he's notable. Urban X Awards has its own article, so it's a notable award and its winners are notable. --JamieTheGenius (talk) 14:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PORNBIO's standard for awards is "well-known/significant", not merely "notable". That's consistent with general practice; there are many notable awards whose individual recipients aren't necessarily notable -- Rhodes scholarships, moat military honors, British crown honors are the standard examples. You should review the many AFDs which have established consensus that Urban X awards don't satisfy PORNBIO standards and don't make a significant contribution to notability. Also refresh yourself on WP:CIVIL. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 14:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you so rude and agressive? Like WTF everything related to pornographic actors' articles annoys you and you always delete souced info from articles with writing ″crap, shit...″ or some stupid thing like that. --JamieTheGenius (talk) 17:37, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Justin Long (pornographic actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Justin Long (pornographic actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Long (pornographic actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 23:07, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tracksuit

I would say you are somewhat biased concerning the pictures of yourself that you are trying to add to various articles. Please keep the mission of Wikimedia in mind. -- O.Koslowski (talk) 12:37, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong with putting your own picture to Wikipedia? It's not like i'm promoting myself, the article is about tracksuit and the picture shows me wearing an Adidas tracksuit. The quality is much better than some of those pictures in the article. --JamieTheGenius (talk) 14:35, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]