User talk:JamieHanlon

Hey man - good work on the SuperPascal article. Glad someone put it up, fixed a few typos for you. JonathanMayUK (talk) 19:17, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

He's looking at YOU!!!! Hello, JamieHanlon, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! MisterWiki talk (SIGN/REVIEW) 23:02, 2 December 2009 (UTC) You can always go to my talk page and tell me your questions :D, Let's be friends!!!! Getting started Getting started. He started inmediately XD!!! Getting started. He started inmediately XD!!! Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Finding your way around. A kitty to make you much more happy XP!!! Table of contents Department directory Editing articles Editing articles. Do like the girl. Editing articles. Do like the girl. How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Getting help. Don't let people do this with you :P Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard - a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help How you can help. If you do the things right, I'll gift you one of these. Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Don't forget to sign my guestbook :D Let's be friends!!!!!

--MisterWiki talk ^{(SIGN/REVIEW)} 23:02, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

November 2014

JamieHanlon: Thanks for the message! I apologize for lack of explanation, I am new to Wikipedia edits.  I can explain in further detail and it's relevance to the subject if necessary. Where can I discuss the specifics of this issue? Is here the place to do it?

AfC notification: Draft:C104 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:C104. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:06, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: C104 (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:C104 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:46, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello! JamieHanlon, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:46, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

I have looked over Draft:C104 and I see that you did not use Wikipedia as a reference, but your references are formatted in a non-standard way so that it looks as if you used Wikipedia as a reference. I am replying at more length on my talk page. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:58, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

I have taken the liberty of adding parameters to the citation templates in your draft, so that links will be provided from the notes to the references. I hope that meets with your approval. --Boson (talk) 18:21, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:C104 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:C104. Thanks! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: STC104 has been accepted

STC104, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:22, 15 December 2016 (UTC)