User talk:JameyRivendell
Managing a conflict of interest
[edit]
Hello, JameyRivendell. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Kathy Barnette, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:29, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
May 2022
[edit] Hello, I'm Tartan357. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2022 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ― Tartan357 Talk 15:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
June 2022
[edit]
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Matt Walsh (political commentator), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 05:21, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to The Daily Wire. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 05:41, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Daily Wire, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 05:48, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi JameyRivendell! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of The Daily Wire several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:The Daily Wire, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 00:58, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
- Also note that the article you're currently edit warring on is subject to a 24 hour revert restriction, so I suggest you revert yourself. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:07, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Doug Mastriano. PRAXIDICAE🌈 23:13, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
AE
[edit]Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is JameyRivendell. Thank you. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:32, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- why don't you fuck off JameyRivendell (talk) 22:26, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
June 2022
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 23:17, 25 June 2022 (UTC)Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:47, 25 June 2022 (UTC)