User talk:Jamesx12345/Archive 9

James_Marsden

I edited the article James_Marsden because I felt that it was written in a bias way that portrayed the subject of a page in a more favorable light, specifically omitting negative details. I added in true, relevant but also negative details to portray a more honest and informative biography of the subject. In the future please discuss any reversals to my edits before you make them. Seifist 23:27, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

On reading it again, it looks OK. Thanks for taking it up with me. James^x12345 23:32, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much James, I understand the need to vet new users and appreciate your time. Seifist 23:27, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Sandboarding

James, you said: "Hello, I'm Jamesx12345. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Sandboarding, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jamesx12345 21:27, 20 October 2013 (UTC)"

Please look at the edit you reverted. Clearly, I only removed duplication, as I said in my summary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eschnett (talk • contribs) 21:33, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

You've made me feel silly now, as you are quite correct. 99.104.107.122 duplicated the content, and then Shadowillrule64 added a helpful comment ("Retarded Sport"). I undid that edit to what I thought was the correct version, and then you corrected me, leading me to revert you. It's now back to where it started, and you have been issued an apology. Sorry. James^x12345 21:38, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Back in Somalia

Back in Somalia I used to wal 10 x 2 x7 which equals 70 miles — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.85.34 (talk) 11:45, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

??? James^x12345 12:46, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Paul Krugman

Please stop reverting my edits. I have cited sources (Niall Ferguson) for my latest edits to Paul Krugman. Please read up on the situation before editing. 50.7.48.146 (talk) 20:13, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Exceptional claims require exceptional sources. I'm not ready to accept that he is an "invincible robotic superhero" just yet. But an interesting hypothesis all the same. Good day. James^x12345 20:18, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

If the Laurence A. Tisch Professor of History at Harvard University and Senior Fellow of the Hoover Institution, Stanford University isn't exceptional then what, exactly, is? You want stone tablets brought down from the mountaintop or something? 50.7.48.146 (talk) 15:22, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

That piece appears to be tongue-in-cheek. If you can get hold of some stone tablets, I may yet be persuaded. James^x12345 16:51, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Need some info On male sexual desire

Cn you please direct me to someone or somewhere, where i can get discuss — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ed beerman (talk • contribs) 05:39, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

You've already posted to the right places. Regards. James^x12345 16:51, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Medeapolis

"Medeapolis" is not how it is spelled, and there's an embarrassing comma splice there. I don't know why you're so attached to these things. Knock it off.173.30.1.34 (talk) 17:49, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Given what you were doing to the article earlier, I wasn't inclined to agree, but you have now made some worthwhile changes. If you know what a comma splice is, why are you vandalising Wikipedia? :-) James^x12345 18:21, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

K&N Engineering source

Hi, Jamesx12345. Will you please duck in at Talk:K&N Engineering, Inc.? There appears to be a needless quarrel going on about a sourced citation. Thank you. 174.21.139.109 (talk) 05:31, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Jamesx12345. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 21:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

I've replied to your message. I'm glad to see that I have your support. Hopefully I'll have the support of the community as well. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

I don't see how it's not constructive. Why is Baruch Goldstein listed as a mass murderer, but Samir Kuntar is not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.215.200.146 (talk) 17:42, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

To be honest, I'm not familiar with either case. The reason I reverted those edits is because we have to be very careful Biographies of living persons, as calling somebody a murderer could have far-reaching implications. Do tread carefully, and use sensitive language if it is not clear-cut. Regards. James^x12345 17:47, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

This is a joke, right? Literally the next sentence says, "participated in the murder and kidnapping of Israelis". The article itself confirms he was given numerous life sentences for the murder of a child. How is it an "implication" that he's a murderer when it's a blatant fact, corroborated by the article itself? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.215.200.146 (talk) 17:50, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Which is the exact edit(s) in question? I'm sure there was something about a political party as well. James^x12345 17:51, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

On top of that, you claim "calling someone a murderer could have far-reaching implications", so doesn't calling Baruch Goldstein a MASS murderer have even FARTHER reaching implications? Why do I smell a double standard here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.215.200.146 (talk) 17:53, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Let me see if I understand this: you are saying we shouldn't call people mass murderers because of the "far reaching implications", yet when I remove such a charged title for Baruch Goldstein, you revert it to say he was a MASS murderer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.215.200.146 (talk) 17:55, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

I'm not trying to be duplicitous here. If you think it improves the article to call him as such, it probably isn't controversial here. The implications I was referring to are those that come with incidents such as the Wikipedia biography controversy, which is a template example for BLP violations (the policy was obviously created in response.) James^x12345 18:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Some jerk on the Internet. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Berry, Alabama because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 19:25, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

My mistake. Igloo is clearly far superior to Huggle. James^x12345 19:26, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Czech election

Hello, I'm the one who edited the Czech legislative election, 2013 template. The fact is, that I only wanted to update the data, but I made a few mistakes and messed it up.. I'm probably too lame to update such a big amount of data, so I won't edit it anymore. (sorry for the mistakes, English is not my first language) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.87.241.115 (talk) 19:34, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

No, no problem. If you have a buggy internet connection that can happen. It isn't used anywhere at the moment, so you can make as many changes as you like. Thanks for getting back to me. James^x12345 19:38, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	hey, is this how i message other users? Captainbasilisx03 (talk) 19:49, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

It's not the best way. Use the "New section" to start a thread, and the "Edit source" to add to one. James^x12345 19:51, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello

	message
	Is this how you message people/ Please respond because if i dont have a reply I won't be able to help when i upgrade people's work Captainbasilisx03 (talk) 19:59, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

I have, above. Typically responses are left below the previous reply. James^x12345 20:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

RfA

Hi James. Just a word of genuinely friendly advice: if you continue to make rebuttals, however legitimately they may seem, there is a risk that you may scupper the very RfA you have promoted. You will find this page I wrote most informative, especially on these issues - it's become the most visited advice page on the topic. Cheers, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:44, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Naturally, you are right. It seems this RFA has gone a different way to how I expected, but it might claw itself back. I'm sorry you couldn't be persuaded, but I think your criteria are very fair. James^x12345 22:40, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your vandalism cleanup help at Sian Breckin, much appreciated, — Cirt (talk) 23:35, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

SFWBC College

Why are you editing the Wikipedia page of Southeastern Free Will Baptist College? Much of your information is either wrong, or it is derogatory.

Thanks, Danny Baer Academic Dean — Preceding unsigned comment added by SFWBCDean (talk • contribs) 17:14, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Are you this person and this person? You might not know, but there is a very strict rule where 1 person has 1 account.

I was just restoring content, without much regard to the actual content. I see now some of it is derogatory, but I'm afraid you were fixing it in the wrong way. Please add references to back up facts, for example whether it is now accredited or not. As a Dean of the College, you clearly have a conflict of interest, so be careful to be neutral or your edits will be reverted. Regards. James^x12345 17:34, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

James, that content should never have been restored wholesale, regardless of how the new editor was going about removing it. Please be careful, if someone is blanking a page calling the content defamatory, there's usually an issue that requires more finesse then a complete revert of their actions.--Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 18:19, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

I appreciate that now. That's why I left the edits by the IP in place and didn't file a report to SPI. I'm afraid I let the editors that reverted the removal of content on that page vet if for me; there are a number of trusted users there and there was no immediately obvious issue until SFWBCDean contacted me, for which I am grateful. Anyway, thanks for being so vigilant. James^x12345 19:35, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Nobody is infallible, it's a good opportunity to remember that not all blanking is vandalism. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 19:56, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

That's true

That is how the Shamrock-Bulldog match ended....don't believe me go watch it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.137.238.242 (talk) 22:40, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

OK. It will most likely be removed again if not sourced though, so you might want to see WP:CITE. Many thanks. James^x12345 22:46, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Huggle 3

Hey Jamesx12345! I am Petrb, one of core developers of Huggle, the antivandalism tool, which you are beta testing (according to https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members#Beta_testers). I am happy to announce that Huggle 3 is ready for some testing. You can read more about it at WP:Huggle/Huggle3_Beta. Please keep in mind that this is a development version and it is not ready for regular use. That means you must:

• Watch your contribs - when anything happens you didn't want, fix it and report a bug
• Frequently checkout source code and build latest version, we change it a lot

If you find any problem with a feature that is supposed to work perfectly, please let us know. Some features are not ready yet, it is listed in known problems on Huggle3 beta page, you don't need to report these - we know it! So, that's it. Have fun testing and please let us know about any problems, either using bugzilla @ http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/ or #huggle ^connect. Please respond to my talk page, I am not going to watch your talk page. Thank you Petrb (talk) 10:57, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Not vandalism

Hi James, re this, please note that a 4th level revert by Huggle for addition of unsourced content is automatically categorised as vandalism, hence the message on their talk page. I have undone your revert. Hope you don't mind. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 18:33, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Nope. I thought an edit warring template would be more appropriate, but forgot to add it. James^x12345 19:58, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Simple English Feynman diagram listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Simple English Feynman diagram. Since you had some involvement with the Simple English Feynman diagram redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:51, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Talk:British National Party/GA4

I've closed the GAN as not listed. I'm busy at the moment, but I will help out when I can towards getting the article listed. Give me a ping in January if it looks like I've forgotten. Regards SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 13:17, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm also busy, but will have a look over it by Christmas at the latest. Regards. James^x12345 22:08, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Orwaldo's gablet

The article Orwaldo's gablet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can find no evidence that this term is used anywhere but in Wikipedia. It does not appear in any of the online references listed in this article, nor can Google books find any instance of the words "Orwaldo" or "gablet" in the offline book source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:38, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Huggle 3 beta is out - and we need more feedback!

Hey Jamesx12345, how are you? I am Petrb, one of huggle developers, and you are currently subscribed as a beta tester of huggle on meta (meta:Huggle/Members. You may not have noticed, but this week I released first beta precompiled installers for ubuntu and microsoft windows! Wikipedia:Huggle/Huggle3_Beta has all the links you need. So if you can, please download it, test it and report all bugs that is really what we need now. Don't forgot that as it's just a beta it's unstable and there are some known issues. Be carefull! Thank you for helping us with huggle Petrb (talk) 16:21, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Shah Safi of Persia

Hello Jamesex12345. I've changed Shahinshah of Persia to Shahinshah of Iran, as Iran is the right word for the country. Even if the two words are used in many cases, it's much more obvious to use the term "Iran" regarding the country and it's continuous history. Even if it was used to name this country "Persia" in western texts, as now "Iran" is widely used, it would be confusing to interchange them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.198.122.189 (talk) 21:30, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

I'm afraid I don't know enough to appreciate whether they are fully synonymous or not. I've reverted myself as you clearly know more than I do :-) Thanks for taking it up with me. James^x12345 21:33, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Stub contest

Hey James, thanks for joining the contest and getting stuck in - I am glad some folks are expanding stubs. Listen, both Old Man of Stoer and Edinburgh University Press are still on the small side to qualify as they need to be 1500 b "readable prose size" to qualify. Do you have the prose tool? I'll put them 'on hol' until they are big enough. Cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:03, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Ok - I'll try and find a bit more for them. I don't have the prose tool, so they could well be under-size. I'd have to look quite hard to find much else, as I've trawled a lot to find what there is. Bizarrely, I can't find anything good for the birds on the Old Man, which is probably a significant aspect. James^x12345 20:07, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

See User:Dr pda/prosesize - this is very useful. Let me know if you need help with installing it. Cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:37, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Old Man of Stoer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Computer hardware (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Processing unit

Sinclair Oxford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gillette

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Strategic Defense Initiative may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Defense Initiative was an important part of his defense policy intended to offset MAD bias.<ref>[http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/421797/nuclear-strategy/52990/Alternatives-to-assured-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:49, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sinclair Scientific, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arccos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Machair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Croft (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Klein Bikes

Hello Jamesx12345. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Klein Bikes".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Klein Bikes}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —Anne Delong (talk) 03:17, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Falkirk Wheel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ripley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Falkirk Wheel may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• had fallen into disuse, and the locks were dismantled in 1933.<ref name=swthist/>ref name=fwhist/>
• * [[Strépy-Thieu boat lift]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:00, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Old Man of Hoy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• http://www.mountaineering-scotland.org.uk/climbthru/1966hoy.html |accessdate=25 January 2014}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Thompson|2011|p=231}}</ref> On 8–9 July 1967, an ascent featured in The Great

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:58, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2014 WikiCup!

Hello Jamesx12345, and welcome to the 2014 WikiCup! Your submission page can be found here. The competition began on 1 January. There have been a few small changes from last year; the rules can be read in full at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring, and the page also includes a summary of changes. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work, and nominated, in 2014 is eligible for points in the competition- the judges will be checking! As ever, this year's competition includes some younger editors. If you are a younger editor, you are certainly welcome, but we have written an advice page at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Advice for younger editors for you. Please do take a look. Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! J Milburn (talk · contribs), The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 20:26, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Falkirk Wheel, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Aqueduct and Canal boat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for reviewing the Jack Parsons article, James! Much appreciated! Midnightblueowl (talk) 10:05, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

I very much enjoyed reviewing it, and learnt a little bit about some early rocketry. That picture of the first JATO sums it up beautifully :-) James^x12345 10:47, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dunrobin Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chippendale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:20, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sinclair Scientific

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sinclair Scientific you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 02:01, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sinclair Scientific

The article Sinclair Scientific you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sinclair Scientific for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 05:52, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dunrobin Castle

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dunrobin Castle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rosiestep -- Rosiestep (talk) 02:10, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Falkirk Wheel

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Falkirk Wheel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ТимофейЛееСуда -- ТимофейЛееСуда (talk) 21:20, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Falkirk Wheel

The article Falkirk Wheel you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Falkirk Wheel for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ТимофейЛееСуда -- ТимофейЛееСуда (talk) 14:10, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dunrobin Castle

The article Dunrobin Castle you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dunrobin Castle for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rosiestep -- Rosiestep (talk) 01:40, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Nice work James, I've addressed a couple of the GAR points too. Let me know if i can be of any further help. Thanks, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 13:04, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll admit to not being very knowledgeable about Scottish history, so I appreciate your help. James^x12345 15:48, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dunrobin Castle

The article Dunrobin Castle you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dunrobin Castle for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rosiestep -- Rosiestep (talk) 03:02, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Falkirk Wheel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mercury

Old Man of Hoy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Shag

Sinclair Enterprise (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to General Instruments

Sinclair Executive (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Reciprocals

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Old Man of Hoy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Old Man of Hoy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Madalibi -- Madalibi (talk) 13:50, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

My comments are ready on Talk:Old Man of Hoy/GA1. Madalibi (talk) 14:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the speedy review. I'll fix them now. James^x12345 16:19, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve Needle (stack)

Hi, I'm Carriearchdale. Jamesx12345, thanks for creating Needle (stack)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add categories and expand the article. Thanks! Carriearchdale (talk) 01:31, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Carriearchdale (talk) 01:31, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Old Man of Hoy

The article Old Man of Hoy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Old Man of Hoy for comments about the article. Well done! Madalibi (talk) 04:10, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

I put the article under "Landforms" at Wikipedia:Good articles. Let me know if you think there is a better category it would fit under. Cheers! Madalibi (talk) 04:15, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick and thorough review. I've found two free versions of the sketch which I'll upload now. James^x12345 13:48, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

The sketch should make a fine addition to the article. Thank you for performing the improvements so fast, it was a pleasure working with you! Madalibi (talk) 15:26, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Dunrobin Castle

Hi James12345, well done on taking so many Scottish articles through GA recently! I have to admit to having looked at Falkirk Wheel, Dunrobin Castle and Old Man of Hoy with a vague notion of reviewing them - I only do GA reviews occasionally, usually if the subject interests me - but they were all picked up very quickly while I pontificated! One small question I have on Dunrobin Castle: in the second paragraph of the 'History' section, there is a sentence Robert the Bruce planted the Gordons at Huntly in Aberdeenshire, and they were created Earls of Huntly in 1445. What does it mean by "planted the Gordons"? It's probably something that I'm totally misunderstanding! SagaciousPhil - Chat 10:37, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

I have to admit to taking the word "planted" from Grimble, who says "These were the Gordons, whom King Robert Bruce planted at Strathbogie in Aberdeenshire..." I took it to mean that he wanted to have an English-speaking family there, but the Clan Gordon article suggests they were supporters of his cause. Kim Traynor or Jonathan Oldenbuck would probably have something closer to the truth. James^x12345 19:02, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

I expect Grimble was just using a loose metaphor based on the idea that feudal kings purposefully placed supporters in specific areas, usually for strategic control. Perhaps he was thinking of how the previous occupant, an Atholl, had been 'uprooted', to use a plant metaphor, and his patrimony handed over to Adam Gordon. (The father had supported Bruce but the son's father-in-law was the murdered John Comyn, so he opposed Bruce.) According to Barrow "on the very eve of Bannockburn [Earl David] attacked the Scottish supply depot at Cambuskenneth Abbey, killing the officer in charge, Sir William of Airth, and many of his men, and carrying off stores of food". For this act of treachery his lands of Strathbogie were confiscated and granted to Sir Adam Gordon of Berwickshire; Barrow continues, "no doubt as part of the price of winning him over and also as reward for his part in delivering the Declaration of Arbroath to Pope John XXI and arguing the Scottish cause at the curia". I've amended the Clan Gordon page to show that Gordon switched his support for Edward I's claim to Bruce's claim to the Scottish crown. Kim Traynor | Talk 22:46, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

My thanks to both of you for such a fast response - my apologies for not noticing the replies earlier. I see the context it is used in now. SagaciousPhil - Chat 12:18, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

I've added a note that they were supporters of Robert the Bruce. James^x12345 13:22, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! I think it makes it clearer now, so much appreciated. SagaciousPhil - Chat 18:46, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Note to IP

I see that you left a message for the IP at User talk:75.172.88.65. However, if I follow the sequence correctly, you realized, after leaving a message, that the edit was correct. I'm struggling to find editors willing to work on wbb articles, so I am happy to see the contributions of this editor. Could I talk you into removing, reverting or clarifying your message to the IP, so they have a more positive experience?--S Philbrick(Talk) 13:31, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Oops - I'm a bit out of practice with Huggle. I've left a note on their talk page explaining. Thanks for drawing this to my attention. James^x12345 18:49, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, I had guessed it was an automatic or semi-automatic post by you; thanks for adding the note, I think it may help.--S Philbrick(Talk) 20:31, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 January newsletter

The 2014 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with, at time of writing, 138 participants. The is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2010. If you are yet to join the competition, don't worry- the judges have agreed to keep the signups open for a few more days. By a wide margin, our current leader is newcomer Godot13 (submissions), whose set of 14 featured pictures, the first FPs of the competition, was worth 490 points. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

• 12george1 (submissions) and TropicalAnalystwx13 (submissions) were the first people to score, for the good article Tropical Storm Bret (1981) and its good article review respectively. 12george1 was also the first person to score in 2012 and 2013.
• Sven Manguard (submissions) scored the first ITN points for 2014 North American polar vortex.
• WonderBoy1998 (submissions) scored points for an early good topic, finishing off Wikipedia:Featured topics/She Wolf.
• TheAustinMan (submissions) scored the first bonus points of the competition, for his work on Typhoon Vera.
• Igordebraga (submissions) has scored the highest number of bonus points for a single article, for the high-importance Jurassic Park (film).

Featured articles, featured lists, featured topics and featured portals are yet to play a part in the competition. The judges have removed a number of submissions which were deemed ineligible. Typically, we aim to see work on a project, followed by a nomination, followed by promotion, this year. We apologise for any disappointment caused by our strict enforcement this year; we're aiming to keep the competition as fair as possible.

Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may be interested to take part in The Core Contest; unlike the WikiCup, The Core Contest is not about audited content, but, like the WikiCup, it is about article improvement; specifically, The Core Contest is about contribution to some of Wikipedia's most important article. Of course, any work done for The Core Contest, if it leads to a DYK, GA or FA, can earn WikiCup points.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 19:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the Forth Crossing, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Newhaven, Queensferry and Dysart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 4 February 2014 (UTC)