User talk:James Lindberg

Welcome to Wikipedia!

- - - W e l c o m e - - -

Hello, James Lindberg! Thank you for your contributions. My name's Airplaneman and I just wanted to say hi and Welcome to Wikipedia!! You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of the world's largest encyclopædia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name, the date and the time. If you are already loving Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field every time you edit. Again, welcome, and happy editing! Airplaneman ^talk 23:52, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1967-68 Macedonian Football League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Veles and BSK

1965–66 Macedonian Football League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Veles

List of Macedonian football champions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to FK Bregalnica

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Olesja Kirij

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Olesja Kirij. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Olesja Kirij

The article Olesja Kirij has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 08:14, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oksana Orehova

The article Oksana Orehova has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 08:23, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1968–69 Macedonian Football League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Veles and BSK

Trifun Kostovski (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Macedonian and Macedonia

1971–72 Macedonian Football League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Veles

1972-73 Macedonian Football League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Veles

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Macedonian Football League 1973-74, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Veles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Macedonian Football League 1974-75, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Veles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eurovision Song Contest 1973, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yugoslavian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove sourced portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 20:40, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Gragjanski Skopje, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 15:42, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jingiby (talk) 18:52, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, I'm Pharaoh of the Wizards. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Gragjanski Skopje, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:07, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at Gragjanski Skopje. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 18:10, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1980-81 Macedonian Football League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Vinica and FK Bregalnica

1981-82 Macedonian Football League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Vinica and FK Bregalnica

1982-83 Macedonian Football League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Vinica and FK Bregalnica

1983-84 Macedonian Football League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to FK Bregalnica and FK Napredak

1979-80 Macedonian Football League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to FK Bregalnica

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:35, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm Jingiby. I wanted to let you know that I undid several of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to FK Vardar, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jingiby (talk) 08:15, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove sourced portions of page content, and to add fictions, as you did to FK Vardar you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 04:20, 11 May 2013 (UTC)or[reply]

Ways to improve Macedonian Volleyball Federation

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. James Lindberg, thanks for creating Macedonian Volleyball Federation!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. 4

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 01:16, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm Jingiby. I noticed that you made a changes to the article Kingdom of Yugoslavia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. They have been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! See also article;s talk-page. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 09:29, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Esma Redžepova, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Macedonia in the Eurovision Song Contest, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Please see guidelines via ProjectEurovision. Wes Mᴥuse 22:38, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Macedonian pre-selection for Eurovision Song Contest

Hello James Lindberg,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Macedonian pre-selection for Eurovision Song Contest for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:25, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. FkpCascais (talk) 17:47, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Macedonian pre-selection for Eurovision Song Contest

Hello James Lindberg,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Macedonian pre-selection for Eurovision Song Contest for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:25, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

I wanted to let you know that I undid your recent contributions, because they didn't appear to be constructive. If you continue to edit pages by deliberately deleting sourced info or introducing biased and/or unsourced information, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits appear to be non constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you have deleted was incorrect, please discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again and provide neutral reliable sources. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 18:35, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove significant amount from the content from an article on Wikipedia, without reliable motivation, as you did at Gragjanski Skopje, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jingiby (talk) 19:06, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Gragjanski Skopje shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Favonian (talk) 19:12, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 months for edit warring, personal attacks and disruptive deletion of sourced contents from articles, as you did at Gragjanski Skopje. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 19:15, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making threats with this comment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 19:28, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Bon Ton Bend

Hello, James Lindberg,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Bon Ton Bend should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bon Ton Bend .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Vanjagenije (talk) 23:43, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]