User talk:James Alltheway

Welcome!

Hello, James Alltheway, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Woodroar (talk) 22:10, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Yannis Livadas

A tag has been placed on Yannis Livadas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Woodroar (talk) 21:04, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear friend the content is not the same; also check the new links who direct to official references. This article is totally different. I am waiting for your reply as soon as possible.

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mike Mike, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Woodroar (talk) 21:35, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please expalin yourself on that, Mike Mike is no longer valid since it is deleted; so what is the basis of all that? Since it is matter of validity concerning the facts i would like to receive a fully detailed report on that. Yet if am not permitted to participate into Wiki, let me know in order to self-delete my account.— Preceding unsigned comment added by James Alltheway (talk • contribs) 21:46, 6 March 2016

User:Mike Mike is not deleted. That account was blocked but later unblocked. Please, sign your messages on Talk pages with 4 tildes (~~~~), and there's no need to leave a message on my page and your page. I'll see it if you continue the discussion here. Woodroar (talk) 22:10, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:46, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]